| Literature DB >> 31525934 |
Richard Mayne, Thomas C Draper, Neil Phillips, James G H Whiting, Roshan Weerasekera, Claire Fullarton, Ben P J de Lacy Costello, Andrew Adamatzky.
Abstract
Neuromorphic computing devices attempt to emulate features of biological nervous systems through mimicking the properties of synapses toward implementing the emergent properties of their counterparts, such as learning. Inspired by recent advances in the utilization of liquid marbles (LMs, microliter quantities of fluid coated in hydrophobic powder) for the creation of unconventional computing devices, we describe the development of LMs with neuromorphic properties through the use of copper coatings and 1.0 mg mL-1 carbon nanotube (CNT)-containing fluid cores. Experimentation was performed through sandwiching the LMs between two cup-style electrodes and stimulating them with repeated dc pulses at 3.0 V. Our results demonstrate that "entrainment" of CNT-filled copper LMs via periodic pulses can cause their electrical resistance to rapidly switch between high to low resistance profiles upon inverting the polarity of stimulation: the reduction in resistance between high and low profiles was approximately 88% after two rounds of entrainment. This effect was found to be reversible through reversion to the original stimulus polarity and was strengthened by repeated experimentation, as evidenced by a mean reduction in time to switching onset of 43%. These effects were not replicated in nanotube solutions not bound inside LMs. Our electrical characterization also reveals that nanotube-filled LMs exhibit pinched loop hysteresis IV profiles consistent with the description of memristors. We conclude by discussing the applications of this technology to the development of unconventional computing devices and the study of emergent characteristics in biological neural tissue.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31525934 PMCID: PMC7007261 DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02552
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Langmuir ISSN: 0743-7463 Impact factor: 3.882
Figure 1Scanning electron micrographs of the experimental materials used. (a) Copper flakes, which were used for LM coatings. (b) CNTs, used in LM cores.
Figure 2Experimental electrical recording apparatus. (a) LM recording apparatus. Two 10 mm Ag/AgCl cup electrodes were used to “sandwich” LMs, with an electrode spacing of 2.0–2.5 mm. Scale bar 5 mm. (b) Schematic diagram of LM recording apparatus (not to scale). CS: clamp stand; LM: liquid marble; K: Keithley SMU; E: electrodes. (c) Fluids were placed into wells overlying needle-shaped electrodes; only one pair of electrodes were used in the experiments described here. Scale bar 10 mm.
Figure 3Graphs to illustrate typical resistance of LMs exposed to 3 V pulses at periodically alternating polarities. Colored areas indicate stimulation phases (red for s1, green for s2, orange for s3 and blue for s4) and resistance values at 0 V have been omitted for clarity. (a) CNT LM, showing NSEs (asterisks). (b) Control water-filled LM. No NSEs are visible.
Table To Show ANOVA Results, Comparing Differences in Means between Phases in LMs Containing CNTs and Water, in Addition to FL Controls Containing CNTs, Triton X-100 (T), and Watera
| CNT LM | H2O LM | CNT FL | T FL | H2O FL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.236 | 1.086 | 3.490 | 0.700 | 1.970 | |
| 0.035 | 0.392 | 0.041 | 0.561 | 0.137 |
F: F-statistic, p: p-value.
p < 0.05.
Table To Show One-Sample t-Test Results, Comparing Percentage Changes in Resistance between s1 → s2, s1 → s4, and s2 → s4 in LMs Containing CNTsa
| mean PC | med PC | CI low | CI high | SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s1 → s2 | 63.95 | 97.64 | 22.18 | 105.7 | 58.40 | 0.007 |
| s1 → s4 | 87.70 | 98.48 | 71.58 | 103.8 | 22.53 | 0.000 |
| s2 → s4 | 29.23 | 38.67 | –13.82 | 72.27 | 60.17 | 0.159 |
CI: confidence interval (in %), Med: median (in %), PC: percentage change (in %), SD: standard deviation.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.0001.
Table To Show Two-Sample t-Test Results, Comparing Percentage Changes in Mean NSE Onset Time between Phases s2 and s4 in LMs Containing CNTsa
| mean PC | med PC | SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s2 → s4 | 43.20 | 39.73 | 22.75 | 0.0005 |
CI: confidence interval (in %), Med: median (in %), PC: percentage change (in %), SD: standard deviation
p < 0.01.
Figure 4Graph to show a typical IV sweep profile from a CNT LM exposed to a 3 V double-ended sweep. Arrows indicate sweep direction.