Literature DB >> 31525860

Neuroanatomical predictors of response to subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression

Tejas Sankar1, M. Mallar Chakravarty1, Natasha Jawa1, Stanley X. Li1, Peter Giacobbe1, Sidney H. Kennedy1, Sakina J. Rizvi1, Helen S. Mayberg1, Clement Hamani1, Andres M. Lozano1.   

Abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation targeting the subcallosal cingulate gyrus (SCG DBS) improves the symptoms of treatment-resistant depression in some patients, but not in others. We hypothesized that there are pre-existing structural brain differences between responders and nonresponders to SCG DBS, detectable using structural MRI.
Methods: We studied preoperative, T1-weighted MRI scans of 27 patients treated with SCG DBS from 2003 to 2011. Responders (n = 15) were patients with a >50% improvement in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score following 12 months of SCG DBS. Preoperative subcallosal cingulate gyrus grey matter volume was obtained using manual segmentation by a trained observer blinded to patient identity. Volumes of hippocampus, thalamus, amygdala, whole-brain cortical grey matter and white matter volume were obtained using automated techniques.
Results: Preoperative subcallosal cingulate gyrus, thalamic and amygdalar volumes were significantly larger in patients who went on to respond to SCG-DBS. Hippocampal volume did not differ between groups. Cortical grey matter volume was significantly smaller in responders, and cortical grey matter:white matter ratio distinguished between responders and nonresponders with high sensitivity and specificity. Limitations: Normalization by intracranial volume nullified some between-group differences in volumetric measures.
Conclusion: There are structural brain differences between patients with treatment-resistant depression who respond to SCG DBS and those who do not. Specifically, the structural integrity of the subcallosal cingulate gyrus target region and its connected subcortical areas, and variations in cortical volume across the entire brain, appear to be important determinants of response. Structural MRI shows promise as a biomarker in deep brain stimulation for depression, and may play a role in refining patient selection for future trials.
© 2020 Joule Inc. or its licensors

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31525860      PMCID: PMC6919920          DOI: 10.1503/jpn.180207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci        ISSN: 1180-4882            Impact factor:   6.186


  81 in total

1.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation of the inferior thalamic peduncle in the treatment of major depression and obsessive compulsive disorders.

Authors:  Fiacro Jiménez; Humberto Nicolini; Andres M Lozano; Fabián Piedimonte; Rafael Salín; Francisco Velasco
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Association of CRHR1 and CRHR2 with major depressive disorder and panic disorder in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Ishitobi; Shinya Nakayama; Kana Yamaguchi; Masayuki Kanehisa; Haruka Higuma; Yoshihiro Maruyama; Taiga Ninomiya; Shizuko Okamoto; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Jusen Tsuru; Hiroaki Hanada; Koichi Isogawa; Jotaro Akiyoshi
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.568

4.  Reduced volume of orbitofrontal cortex in major depression.

Authors:  J Douglas Bremner; Meena Vythilingam; Eric Vermetten; Ahsan Nazeer; Jahangir Adil; Sarfraz Khan; Lawrence H Staib; Dennis S Charney
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Double-blind optimization of subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study.

Authors:  Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Susan Anderson; Angela Haffenden; Swati Chavda; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.186

6.  Deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Donald A Malone; Darin D Dougherty; Ali R Rezai; Linda L Carpenter; Gerhard M Friehs; Emad N Eskandar; Scott L Rauch; Steven A Rasmussen; Andre G Machado; Cynthia S Kubu; Audrey R Tyrka; Lawrence H Price; Paul H Stypulkowski; Jonathon E Giftakis; Mark T Rise; Paul F Malloy; Stephen P Salloway; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Deep brain stimulation to reward circuitry alleviates anhedonia in refractory major depression.

Authors:  Thomas E Schlaepfer; Michael X Cohen; Caroline Frick; Markus Kosel; Daniela Brodesser; Nikolai Axmacher; Alexius Young Joe; Martina Kreft; Doris Lenartz; Volker Sturm
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Defining critical white matter pathways mediating successful subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Patricio Riva-Posse; Ki Sueng Choi; Paul E Holtzheimer; Cameron C McIntyre; Robert E Gross; Ashutosh Chaturvedi; Andrea L Crowell; Steven J Garlow; Justin K Rajendra; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  The influence of 5-HTTLPR and Val66Met polymorphisms on cortical thickness and volume in limbic and paralimbic regions in depression: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Natalia Jaworska; Frank P MacMaster; Jane Foster; Rajamannar Ramasubbu
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Neurocognitive Predictors of Response in Treatment Resistant Depression to Subcallosal Cingulate Gyrus Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Shane J McInerney; Heather E McNeely; Joseph Geraci; Peter Giacobbe; Sakina J Rizvi; Amanda K Ceniti; Anna Cyriac; Helen S Mayberg; Andres M Lozano; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sexually divergent cortical control of affective-autonomic integration.

Authors:  Tyler Wallace; Derek Schaeuble; Sebastian A Pace; Morgan K Schackmuth; Shane T Hentges; Adam J Chicco; Brent Myers
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.693

2.  Functional connectivity between the amygdala and subgenual cingulate gyrus predicts the antidepressant effects of ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Nakamura; Masaru Tomita; Naoki Horikawa; Masatoshi Ishibashi; Ken Uematsu; Teruyuki Hiraki; Toshi Abe; Naohisa Uchimura
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacol Rep       Date:  2021-02-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.