| Literature DB >> 31525735 |
Yong Hao1, Jie Ding1, Ronghua Hong1, Shuwei Bai1, Ze Wang1, Chengjun Mo1, Qiang Hu2, Zezhi Li1, Yangtai Guan1.
Abstract
Although interleukin-18 (IL-18) has been implicated in the pathophysiology of stroke, research findings concerning IL-18 level in stroke have been inconsistent. Thus, we performed a cross-sectional study in patients with first-episode ischemic stroke and then extracted relevant data from databases to validate our results. A total of 252 patients and 259 healthy subjects were recruited, and serum IL-18 level was evaluated in a cross-sectional study. Then, we extracted data and conducted a meta-analysis, including 2,928 patients and 3,739 controls to support our results. A 95% confidence interval for standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated using a Z test. We found IL-18 was higher in stroke patients than in controls (2.39 ± 0.25 vs. 2.25 ± 0.28, F=8.60, p=0.004) and was negatively associated with the NIHSS scale (r = -0.14, p=0.028). A subsequent meta-analysis confirmed that IL-18 level was higher in stroke patients than in controls (SMD = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.54 ∼ 2.73, P< 0.001). IL-18 level increased with the severity of the stroke (p< 0.01). These findings revealed increased IL-18 level contributed to the development and severity of ischemic stroke, suggesting the potential of this biomarker to become an important reference for the early monitoring of ischemic stroke.Entities:
Keywords: Interleukin-18; association; cross-sectional study; ischemic stroke; meta-analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31525735 PMCID: PMC6781996 DOI: 10.18632/aging.102253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Demographic characteristics in patients and healthy controls.
| Age (years, mean±SD) | 66.4 ± 10.51 | 44.22 ± 12.51 | t=21.78 | <0.0001 |
| Gender (male) | 175 (69.80%) | 165 (63.71%) | χ2=2.17 | 0.16 |
| BMI | 22.75±2.50 | 23.10±2.27 | t=1.67 | 0. 10 |
| Smoking | 20 (7.94%) | 14 (5.41%) | χ2=1.32 | 0.25 |
| Duration of illness | 32.01±4.54 | - | - | - |
| NIHSS Scale | 7.87±3.82 | - | - | - |
| IL-18 level | 2.39 ± 0.25 | 2.25 ± 0.28 | F=8.60 | 0.004 |
Figure 1Flow chart shows study selection procedure. Twelve case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis.
The baseline characteristics for included studies.
| Zhao Y(2017) | 2017 | China | Asians | 100 | 60 | 64/36 | 38/22 | 63.5±11.2 | 58.6±6.8 | ELISA |
| Wang TR(2017) | 2017 | China | Asians | 60 | 60 | 35/25 | 30/30 | 56.3±9.2 | 58.7±6.6 | ELISA |
| Zou Q(2016) | 2016 | China | Asians | 70 | 70 | 38/32 | 40/30 | 52.0±6.0 | 53.0±5.0 | ELISA |
| Zhao HG(2016) | 2016 | China | Asians | 112 | 55 | 61/51 | 31/24 | 62.0±10.0 | 60.0±7.1 | ELISA |
| Lu YQ(2016) | 2016 | China | Asians | 32 | 35 | 25/7 | 25/10 | 71.7±5.9 | 67.3±6.5 | ELISA |
| Hou XX(2016) | 2016 | China | Asians | 64 | 30 | 34/30 | 18/12 | 66.8±7.3 | 69.7±6.8 | ELISA |
| Guo CF(2016) | 2016 | China | Asians | 70 | 70 | 41/29 | 43/27 | 56.2±3.8 | 55.8±3.5 | ELISA |
| Yan WR(2015) | 2015 | China | Asians | 47 | 60 | 25/22 | 30/30 | 68.59±8.7 | 66.91±9.5 | ELISA |
| Chen FF(2015) | 2015 | China | Asians | 38 | 35 | 27/11 | NR | 60.5(42~6 | NR | ELISA |
| Wei GY(2013) | 2013 | China | Asians | 153 | 114 | 85/68 | 65/49 | 58.5 ± 12. | NR | ELISA |
| Li SS(2013) | 2013 | China | Asians | 42 | 28 | NR | 14/14 | NR | 68.8±6.9 | ELISA |
| Sarchielli P-a(2013) | 2013 | Italy | Caucasian | 28 | 31 | 6/22 | 11/20 | 64 (53~70) | 36 (28~50 | Luminex x |
| Sarchielli P-b(2013) | 2013 | Italy | Caucasian | 21 | 31 | 10/11 | 11/20 | 71(67~73) | 36 (28~50 | Luminex x |
| Jefferis BJ(2013) | 2013 | UK | Caucasian | 300 | 590 | 191/109 | 372/218 | 71.3 ± 5.3 | 71.3 ± 5.3 | ELISA |
| Sun J(2013) | 2013 | China | Asians | 79 | 60 | 40/39 | 30/30 | 68.6(60~7 | 66.5(60~7 | ELISA |
| Zhao Y(2012) | 2012 | China | Asians | 83 | 32 | 58/25 | 20/12 | 61.35±13. | 58.32±12. | ELISA |
| Wang YJ(2011) | 2011 | China | Asians | 218 | 218 | NR | NR | NR | NR | ELISA |
| Ormstad H(2011) | 2011 | Norway | Caucasian | 45 | 40 | 27/18 | 20/20 | 67.7 ± 11. | 59.1 ± 5.7 | Luminex x |
| Stott DJ-a(2009) | 2009 | UK | Caucasian | 445 | 532 | NR | 270/262 | NR | 75.9 ± 3.6 | ELISA |
| Stott DJ-b(2009) | 2009 | UK | Caucasian | 179 | 532 | NR | 270/262 | NR | 75.9 ± 3.6 | ELISA |
| Bossu P(2009) | 2009 | Italy | Caucasian | 30 | 25 | 14/16 | 12/13 | 66.4 ± 14. | 68.6 ± 7.2 | ELISA |
| Welsh P(2008) | 2008 | UK | Caucasian | 472 | 1011 | 348/124 | 750/261 | 67 (66~67 | 66 (66~67 | ELISA |
| Yuen CM(2007) | 2007 | China | Asians | 217 | 20 | 136/81 | 12/8 | 66.3 ± 10. | 67.1 ± 9.3 | ELISA |
| Zaremba J(2003) | 2003 | Poland | Caucasian | 23 | 15 | 6/17 | 4/11 | 72.2 ± 10. | 70.1 ± 8.6 | ELISA |
Notes: M = male; F = female; NR = not reported; a: silent brain infarcts; b:lacunar stroke.
Figure 2The CASP score of the included literature. The blue bar indicates lower risk of bias, and the red bar indicates higher risk of bias.
Figure 3Forest plots for the difference of interleukin-18 levels between stroke patients and healthy controls.
Figure 4Subgroup analyses for the difference of interleukin-18 levels between stroke patients and healthy controls (A, race; B, sample size; C, detection method).
Figure 5Single factor meta regression analysis (A, race; B, detection method; C, years; D, sample size).
Figure 6Sensitivity analysis of the difference of interleukin-18 levels between stroke patients and healthy controls.
Figure 7Funnel plot of publication biases on the difference of interleukin-18 levels between stroke patients and healthy controls.