Literature DB >> 31525096

Prognostic Value of Coronary Microvascular Function Measured Immediately After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: An International Multicenter Study.

Takeshi Nishi1, Tadashi Murai2, Giovanni Ciccarelli3, Sonia V Shah1, Yuhei Kobayashi1, François Derimay1, Katsuhisa Waseda4, Avalon Moonen5,6, Masahiro Hoshino2, Atsushi Hirohata7, Andy S C Yong5,6, Martin K C Ng6,8, Tetsuya Amano4, Emanuele Barbato3,9, Tsunekazu Kakuta2, William F Fearon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of coronary microvascular dysfunction after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear in patients with stable coronary artery disease. This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of microvascular function measured immediately after PCI in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
METHODS: We enrolled 572 patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent PCI and elective measurement of the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) immediately after PCI from 8 centers in 4 countries. Impaired microvascular function was defined as IMR≥25 (high IMR). Major adverse cardiac events, including death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization, were evaluated.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up duration of 4.0 years, the cumulative major adverse cardiac events rate was significantly higher in the high IMR group (n=66/148) compared with the low IMR group (n=128/424; hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.16-2.105; P=0.001), primarily due to a higher rate of periprocedural MI (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.11-2.28; P=0.004) but also due to higher rates of mortality (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.76-3.35; P=0.22), spontaneous MI (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 0.67-6.63; P=0.20) and target vessel revascularization (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.77-2.54; P=0.27). Cumulative risk for death, spontaneous MI, and target vessel revascularization was higher in the high IMR group (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.99-2.43; P=0.056), as was death and spontaneous MI alone (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.96-3.36; P=0.065). On multivariable analysis, high IMR post-PCI was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events.
CONCLUSIONS: IMR measured immediately after PCI predicts adverse events in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery disease; microcirculation; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31525096     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  17 in total

Review 1.  Microvascular Angina Diagnosed by Absolute PET Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification.

Authors:  Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Diseases: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Marco Giuseppe Del Buono; Rocco A Montone; Massimiliano Camilli; Salvatore Carbone; Jagat Narula; Carl J Lavie; Giampaolo Niccoli; Filippo Crea
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Coronary No-Reflow Phenomenon.

Authors:  Gagan Kaur; Patrick Baghdasaryan; Balaji Natarajan; Prabhdeep Sethi; Ashis Mukherjee; Padmini Varadarajan; Ramdas G Pai
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2022-01-13

4.  Prognostic value of combined coronary angiography-derived IMR and myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT SPECT in INOCA.

Authors:  Lu Liu; Neng Dai; Guoqing Yin; Wen Zhang; Abdul-Quddus Mohammed; Siling Xu; Xian Lv; Tingting Shi; Cailin Feng; Ayman A Mohammed; Redhwan M Mareai; Yawei Xu; Xuejing Yu; Fuad A Abdu; Fei Yu; Wenliang Che
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Angina with coronary microvascular dysfunction and its physiological assessment: a review with cases.

Authors:  Pitt O Lim
Journal:  Br J Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 6.  Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Coronary No-Reflow Phenomenon.

Authors:  Gagan Kaur; Patrick Baghdasaryan; Balaji Natarajan; Prabhdeep Sethi; Ashis Mukherjee; Padmini Varadarajan; Ramdas G Pai
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-03-03

7.  Coronary Flow Reserve and Glycemic Variability in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Takeshi Nishi; Yuichi Saito; Hideki Kitahara; Tomoko Nishi; Yoshihide Fujimoto; Yoshio Kobayashi
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 1.271

8.  Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Predicts Outcomes in Patients With Prior Surgical Revascularization.

Authors:  Andreas Seraphim; Benjamin Dowsing; Krishnaraj S Rathod; Hunain Shiwani; Kush Patel; Kristopher D Knott; Sameer Zaman; Ieuan Johns; Yousuf Razvi; Rishi Patel; Hui Xue; Daniel A Jones; Marianna Fontana; Graham Cole; Rakesh Uppal; Rhodri Davies; James C Moon; Peter Kellman; Charlotte Manisty
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 27.203

9.  Simplified Assessment of the Index of Microvascular Resistance.

Authors:  Monika Kodeboina; Sakura Nagumo; Daniel Munhoz; Jeroen Sonck; Niya Mileva; Emanuele Gallinoro; Alessandro Candreva; Takuya Mizukami; Frederik Van Durme; Alex Heyse; Eric Wyffels; Marc Vanderheyden; Emanuele Barbato; Jozef Bartunek; Bernard De Bruyne; Carlos Collet
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Association of microvascular dysfunction with clinical outcomes in patients with non-flow limiting fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Takeshi Nishi; Tadashi Murai; Katsuhisa Waseda; Atsushi Hirohata; Andy S C Yong; Martin K C Ng; Tetsuya Amano; Emanuele Barbato; Tsunekazu Kakuta; William F Fearon
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.