Terry C Davis1, Alfred Rademaker2, James Morris1, Laurie Anne Ferguson3, Gary Wiltz4, Connie L Arnold1. 1. Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 3. College of Nursing and Health, Loyola University, New Orleans, Louisiana. 4. Teche Action Clinic, Franklin, Louisiana.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short-term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics. METHODS: A 2-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50-75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow-up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT-the return of the FIT kit in both years. PARTICIPANTS: Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy. FINDINGS: Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2). CONCLUSION: Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long-term FIT screening among rural participants.
PURPOSE: The majority of colorectal cancer (CRC) research using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has studied short-term screening results in predominantly urban areas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 outreach strategies embedded in a health literacy intervention on repeat CRC screening in rural community clinics. METHODS: A 2-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in 4 rural clinics in Louisiana. During a regularly scheduled clinic visit, participants ages 50-75 received a FIT kit and brief educational intervention. Participants were randomized to receive an automated call or a personal call by a prevention counselor after 4 weeks and 8 weeks if FIT kits were not returned. In year 2, materials were mailed, and follow-up calls were conducted as in year 1. The primary outcome was repeat FIT-the return of the FIT kit in both years. PARTICIPANTS: Of 568 eligible participants, 55% were female, 67% were African American, and 39% had low health literacy. FINDINGS: Repeat FIT rates were 36.5% for those receiving the automated call and 33.6% for those receiving a personal call (P = .30). No annual FITs were returned in 30% of participants, while only 1 FIT was returned by 35% of participants (31% only year 1 and 4% only year 2). CONCLUSION: Sustaining CRC screening with FIT is challenging in rural clinics. A lower cost automated call was just as effective as the personal call in promoting repeat annual screening. However, more intensive strategies are needed to improve long-term FIT screening among rural participants.
Authors: Robert J Fortuna; Amna Idris; Paul Winters; Sharon G Humiston; Steven Scofield; Samantha Hendren; Patricia Ford; Shirley X L Li; Kevin Fiscella Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: David W Baker; Tiffany Brown; David R Buchanan; Jordan Weil; Kate Balsley; Lauren Ranalli; Ji Young Lee; Kenzie A Cameron; M Rosario Ferreira; Quinn Stephens; Shira N Goldman; Alred Rademaker; Michael S Wolf Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Michael S Wolf; Elizabeth A H Wilson; David N Rapp; Katherine R Waite; Mary V Bocchini; Terry C Davis; Rima E Rudd Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jane N Bolin; Gail R Bellamy; Alva O Ferdinand; Ann M Vuong; Bita A Kash; Avery Schulze; Janet W Helduser Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: David H Smith; Adrienne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; David M Mosen; Elizabeth G Liles; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Meyers; Russell E Glasgow Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Ingrid J Hall; Florence K L Tangka; Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Barry I Graubard; Nancy Breen Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Terry C Davis; James D Morris; Elise H Reed; Laura M Curtis; Michael S Wolf; Adrienne B Davis; Connie L Arnold Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 2.261
Authors: Charles R Rogers; Phung Matthews; Lei Xu; Kenneth Boucher; Colin Riley; Matthew Huntington; Nathan Le Duc; Kola S Okuyemi; Margaret J Foster Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 3.240