Literature DB >> 31523338

Assessment of Gap Junction Protein Beta-2 rs3751385 Gene Polymorphism in Psoriasis Vulgaris.

Elli-Anna Stylianaki1, Anthony Karpouzis2, Gregory Tripsianis3, Stavroula Veletza1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gap junction protein beta 2 (GJB2) upregulation in psoriasis transcriptome analysis as well as connexin 26 (Cx26, encoded by GJB2) expression upregulation in psoriatic plaques has already been substantiated. GJB2 rs72474224 and rs3751385 have been correlated with psoriasis vulgaris incidence in Chinese populations. Here we study the effect of rs3751385 in patients suffering from psoriasis vulgaris in a Caucasian Greek population at the prefecture of Thrace in Northern Greece.
METHODS: One hundred and seventy-three (111 males and 62 females) psoriatic patients (108 were of early-onset psoriasis) and 171 matched controls were included in the study. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes and genotyping was carried out by polymerase chain reaction-restriction-fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP).
RESULTS: A statistically significant lower frequency of C/T genotype in late-onset male psoriasis vulgaris (P = 0.029) as well as of T allele in female early-onset psoriasis vulgaris (P = 0.049) were ascertained.
CONCLUSIONS: On condition that all other genetic or environmental factors remain stable, the existence and possible interaction between GJB2 rs3751385 C and T alleles in male psoriatic patients may be considered as protective gene component against late-onset psoriasis appearance, while presence of the T allele in female might block the histogenetic mechanisms of early-onset psoriasis lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Connexin 26; Early-onset psoriasis; GJB2; Late-onset psoriasis; Psoriasis genetics; Psoriasis pathogenesis; rs3751385

Year:  2019        PMID: 31523338      PMCID: PMC6731047          DOI: 10.14740/jocmr3845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med Res        ISSN: 1918-3003


Introduction

Psoriasis is a genetically determined lifelong disease whose genetic component interacts with environmental triggers [1-4]. Psoriasis recurrence in first-degree relatives of patients suffering from the disease is about 10 times greater than that in general population [5]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have revealed the possible correlation of psoriasis with a linkage between a multifactorial genetic predisposition and certain haplotypes of human leukocytes antigens (HLAs) [6]. Classical major histocompatibility complex alleles studies suggested a strong association of early-onset psoriasis with HLA-Cw6, the primary PSOR1 risk allele [7]. Genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of psoriasis as well as high number of involved genes with low penetrance, constitute factors that obscure the recognition of clearly defined inheritance patterns of psoriasis and thus make it difficult to determine the extent of contribution of non-major histocompatibility complex loci [8, 9]. At least 20 possible loci, located on 15 different chromosomes, have been suggested as related to psoriasis [10]. Specific genetic polymorphisms in candidate genes have been indicated as implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis vulgaris [10, 11]. A gap junction network, consisting of connexin protein subunits, is a major component of epidermis cell-cell communication. Gap junctions rule cell-cell communication within cells in multicellular organisms. This communication is necessary for maintaining cellular homeostasis, ensuring cell reactions to stimuli and controlling cellular growth and tissue structural development [12, 13]. Vertebrate gap junction channels are formed by various combinations of several connexins [14]. Connexons or connexin hemichannels are connexin hexamers that appear at gap junction domains of cell membranes, where the intercellular space constitutes a pore, 2 - 3 nm wide. Gap junctions in invertebrates are formed by transmembrane proteins, defined as innexins. Formation of a channel through cell membrane is performed by a group of innexins that constitute an innexon [14]. In a similar way, in vertebrates, pannexins constitute a family of proteins, homologous to invertebrate innexins; six pannexin subunits form a pannexon, a cell membrane channel, a main enabler of extracellular ATP release [15-17]. Gap junctions are defined as non-specific pores connecting adjacent cells but also as integral membrane proteins that enable direct cytoplasmic exchange of ions and low molecular weight (up to 1 kDa) metabolites through the pores [17]. Different connexins correspond to different pore diameter. To date, 21 connexins have been identified in humans. Connexins are characterized by a common sequence of structural elements, consisting of four hydrophobic transmembrane (M1-M4), two extracellular (E1, E2), three cytoplasmic domains, comprising amino-terminus (NT), cytoplasmic loop (CL) and carboxy-terminus (CT). CL and CT are virtually specific to each connexin isoform. Using immunostaining and immunoblotting, Cx43, Cx26, Cx31, Cx37, Cx30, Cx30.3 have been isolated from human epidermis, Cx43, Cx26 from hair follicle, Cx43 from sebaceous glands, Cx31, Cx26 from eccrine sweat glands and finally, CX43, Cx40 from dermal fibroblasts. Cx26 (13q11-q12) has been expressed in the inner ear, mammary gland, liver, mucous membranes, kidney, pancreas, intestine, skin and appendages [18-20]. F142L mutation of GJB2 gene has been incriminated in bilateral, profound, sensorineural hearing loss in association with an original spectrum of mucocutaneous semeiology. More precisely, a 2-year-old Caucasian female presented with periorificial and truncal erythematous patches, scaly plaques involving the face, upper extremities, external genital organs, gluteal region, perineum, pubic area, crusted plaques of the scalp, bilateral gluteal calcinosis cutis, scaling-obstruction of external auditory canals as well as development of granulomatous tissue around a gastrostomy [21]. c3 LG>A (p.G11R) mutation of GJB6 gene (encoding connexin-30) has been incriminated for an autosomal dominant hidrotic dysplasia, including alopecia, palmoplantar hyperkeratosis and transverse curvature along the longitudinal axis of the nail (Clouston syndrome) [22]. Four mutations of GJB6 (C11R, V37E, D50N, A88V) as well as mutations in GJA1 (V41L) and GJB2 (r127H) have been related to Clouston syndrome [23, 24]. Mutant R75W of GJB2 (C>A) has been established as the basis of a heterozygous missense mutation, leading to functional defects of Cx26, clinically appearing in form of dominant deaf-mutism and palmoplantar keratoderma [24]. D66H missense mutation of GJB2 is responsible for mutilating keratoderma and sensorineural deafness (Vohwinkel’s syndrome) [25]. Bart-Pumphrey syndrome (white discoloration of the nails, knuckle verrucous growths, hearing loss, palmoplantar keratoderma) is genetically encoded by a heterozygous substitution C to A, leading to a non-conservative replacement of asparagine 54 with a negatively charged lysine (N54K) in the first extracellular loop of Cx26 [26]. D50Y is the most frequent among at least nine GJB2 mutations, possibly incriminated in the process of keratitis, ichthyosis and deafness syndrome (KID), whose setting might include photophobia corneal neovascularization and scarring, palmoplantar keratoderma, ichthyosis, squamous cell carcinoma of mouth lining [27]. Porokeratotic eccrine ostial and dermal duct nevus (PEODDN) syndrome, associated with the same mutations as those implicated in KID syndrome, is characterized by coexistence of dermal duct nevus, epidermal nevus and porokeratosis eccrine ostial nevus. In this disorder, somatic Cx26 mutations may produce linear bands of degenerated keratinocytes. Clinically, brownish punctuate papules and plaques appear in a linear pattern, especially on the extremities, usually at birth or childhood and rarely in adults. Histologically, parakeratotic columns occupy epidermal invaginations and an underlying acrosyringeal duct may be located at the base of the invagination [28-30]. PEODDN may be caused by p.Gly45Glu mutation (present exclusively within the epidermis) in an equimolar ratio to the wild type allele [28-30]. All of the pre-mentioned genetically encoded syndromes (due to Cx26 mutations) are characterized by hyperkeratotic thickening of certain skin areas, thus suggesting implication of Cx26 in the rate of differentiation and proliferation of the human epidermis [31-36]. High mRNA and protein levels of Cx26 have been detected by northern blot and immunofluorescence in fully mature psoriatic plaques, but not in non lesional regions of psoriatic patients or controls [31]. GJB2 rs72474224 and rs3751385 have been previously associated with psoriasis vulgaris in Chinese populations [37, 38]. Taking into consideration these data in association with the lack of evidence in non-Chinese populations, we decided to study the distribution of rs3751385 in psoriatic patients in a Caucasian Greek population at the prefecture of Thrace in Northern Greece.

Materials and Methods

Patients’ characteristics

One hundred and seventy-three consecutive psoriatic patients examined at the University Clinic of Dermatology of the University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis in Thrace, Northern Greece, 111 males (64.9%) and 62 females (35.8%), were included in this study. Patients were randomly selected, regardless of body mass characteristics. Patients’ age ranged from 15 to 90 years with a median age of 56.25 ± 16.35 years. All patients were clinically diagnosed and suffered from psoriasis vulgaris. Regarding age of onset, 108 patients were characterized as early-onset, first diagnosed before the age of 40. Psoriasis patients with accompanying disease were excluded from the study in order to avoid possible interactions with potentially coexisting genetically determined dermatological disorders. One hundred and seventy-one healthy unrelated subjects, free from psoriasis, individually matched to patients by both gender and age, were recruited as controls (111 males (64.9%) and 60 females (35.1%)). There were no significant differences in gender and age. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium: controls χ2 = 0.341, df = 1, P = 0.559, patients χ2 = 0.086, df = 1, P = 0.769. The characteristics of patients suffering from psoriasis vulgaris are summarized in Table 1. This study was conducted in compliance with the ethical standards of the responsible institution on human subjects as well as with the Helsinki Declaration.
Table 1

Characteristics of Patients With Psoriasis and Healthy Controls

PatientsControlsP value
No.173171
Age (years; mean ± SD)48.97 ± 16.0648.56 ± 15.960.810
Gender0.884
  Male111 (64.2%)111 (64.9%)
  Female62 (35.8%)60 (35.1%)
Age onset
  Early108 (62.4%)-
  Late65 (37.6%)-

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Controls: χ2 = 0.341, df = 1, P = 0.559. Patients: χ2 = 0.086, df = 1, P = 0.769.

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Controls: χ2 = 0.341, df = 1, P = 0.559. Patients: χ2 = 0.086, df = 1, P = 0.769.

Methods

Genotyping: Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes either using the kit Nucleospin® Blood of Macherey-Nagel or by salting out [39]. Genotyping was carried out by PCR-RFLP, using primers F’: 5’-GTTTAACGATTGCCCAGTT-3’ and R’: 5’-TAACAGCCTGGGGTCTCAGT-3’. The 276-bp long amplicon was subsequently digested with NheI and separated by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel. Three genotypes were defined, according to their distinct patterns of bands: CC (276 bp), C/T (276, 187 and 93 bp) and TT (187 and 93 bp).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Software Microsoft Office Excel 2007 and Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 16.0). The observed genotype distributions were compared with those expected from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using a standard χ2 test. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) for the genotypes was calculated after correction for psoriasis risk factors with binary logistic regression. All quantitative statistical analyses were carried out using the two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

GJB2 gene is located at chromosome 13. Rs3751385: C>T is located at the 3’UTR region of the GJB2 gene. Our study included 173 patients suffering from psoriasis vulgaris, ranged from 15 to 90 years of age, 111 males and 62 females, 108 with early-onset and 65 with late-onset psoriasis. Patients were compared to 171 controls, individually matched to patients by both gender and age, as described in “patients’ characteristics” and summarized in Table 1. The distribution of rs3751385 genotypes and alleles in patients suffering from psoriasis vulgaris and matched healthy controls is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Distribution of GJB-2 SNP Genotypes Among Patients With Psoriasis and Healthy Controls According to Subject’s Gender

Controls*Patients*OR95% CIP value
Total
  Genotype
    C/C111 (64.9%)127 (73.4%)Ref.
    C/T55 (32.2%)43 (24.9%)0.680.42 - 1.100.113
    T/T5 (2.9%)3 (1.7%)0.510.12 - 2.210.372
  Recessive model
    C/C111 (64.9%)127 (73.4%)Ref.
    C/T or T/T60 (35.1%)46 (26.6%)0.670.42 - 1.060.087
  Allele contrast
    C277 (81.0%)297 (85.8%)Ref.
    T65 (19.0%)49 (14.2%)0.700.47 - 1.050.086
Males
  Genotype
    C/C77 (69.4%)84 (75.7%)Ref.
    C/T32 (28.8%)25 (22.5%)0.720.39 - 1.320.283
    T/T2 (1.8%)2 (1.8%)0.920.13 - 6.690.931
  Recessive model
    C/C77 (69.4%)84 (75.7%)Ref.
    C/T or T/T34 (30.6%)27 (24.3%)0.730.40 - 1.320.293
  Allele contrast
    C186 (83.8%)193 (86.9%)Ref.
    T36 (16.2%)29 (13.1%)0.780.46 - 1.320.349
Females
  Genotype
    C/C34 (56.7%)43 (69.4%)Ref.
    C/T23 (38.3%)18 (29.0%)0.620.29 - 1.340.227
    T/T3 (5.0%)1 (1.6%)0.260.03 - 2.640.256
  Recessive model
    C/C34 (56.7%)43 (69.4%)Ref.
    C/T or T/T26 (43.3%)19 (30.6%)0.580.28 - 1.220.153
  Allele contrast
    C91 (75.8%)104 (83.9%)Ref.
    T29 (24.2%)20 (16.1%)0.610.32 - 1.150.123

Statistical significance for differences in genotype, G-containing genotype and allelic frequencies between patients with psoriasis vulgaris and healthy controls: 1) χ2 = 3.033, df = 2, P = 0.219; χ2 = 2.913, df = 1, P = 0.088; χ2 = 2.919, df = 1, P = 0.088 among the entire cohort; 2) χ2 = 1.164, df = 2, P = 0.559; χ2 =1 .108, df = 1, P = 0.293; χ2 = 0.883, df = 1, P = 0.347 among males; 3) χ2 = 2.630, df = 2, P = 0.269; χ2 = 2.109, df = 1, P = 0.146; χ2 = 2.455, df = 1, P = 0.117 among females. *Data are number of subjects and percentage (%). †Adjusted for age and gender. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Statistical significance for differences in genotype, G-containing genotype and allelic frequencies between patients with psoriasis vulgaris and healthy controls: 1) χ2 = 3.033, df = 2, P = 0.219; χ2 = 2.913, df = 1, P = 0.088; χ2 = 2.919, df = 1, P = 0.088 among the entire cohort; 2) χ2 = 1.164, df = 2, P = 0.559; χ2 =1 .108, df = 1, P = 0.293; χ2 = 0.883, df = 1, P = 0.347 among males; 3) χ2 = 2.630, df = 2, P = 0.269; χ2 = 2.109, df = 1, P = 0.146; χ2 = 2.455, df = 1, P = 0.117 among females. *Data are number of subjects and percentage (%). †Adjusted for age and gender. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval. Comparison of the entire cohort of psoriatic patients with controls revealed no statistically significant difference, regarding distribution of the rs3751385 genotypes and alleles among the entire cohort (χ2 = 3.033, df = 2, P = 0.219 for genotypes; χ2 = 2.913, df = 1, P = 0.088 for genotype recessive model; χ2 = 2.919, df = 1, P = 0.088 for allele contrast). When patients were stratified by gender, we observed that neither male nor female psoriatic patients differ significantly with controls (among males: χ2 = 1.164, df = 2, P = 0.559 for genotypes, χ2 = 1.108, df = 1, P = 0.293 for recessive model, χ2 = 0.883, df = 1, P = 0.347 for allele contrast and among females χ2 = 2.630, df = 2, P = 0.269 for genotypes, χ2 = 2.109, df = 1, P = 0.146 for recessive model, χ2 = 2.455, df = 1, P = 0.117 for allele contrast) (Table 2). Subsequently, analysis was stratified according to subjects’ age of psoriasis onset (Table 3 for early-onset psoriasis and Table 4 for late-onset psoriasis). In Table 3, we present data regarding patients with early-onset psoriasis: comparison of the cohort of early-onset psoriasis versus matched controls again detected no statistically significant differences between the two groups (χ2 = 2.047, df = 2, P = 0.359 for genotypes, χ2 = 1.227, df = 1, P = 0.268 for recessive model, χ2 = 1.619, df = 1, P = 0.203 for allele contrast). Similarly, further stratification of the early-onset cohort by gender did not show any significant differences from controls for either male patients (χ2 = 0.047, df = 2, P = 0.977 for genotypes, χ2 = 0.000, df = 1, P = 0.991 for recessive model, χ2 = 0.004, df = 1, P = 951 for allele contrast).
Table 3

Distribution of GJB-2 SNP Genotypes Among Patients With Early-Onset Psoriasis and Healthy Controls According to Subject’s Gender

Controls*Early onset*OR95% CIP value
Total
  Genotype
    C/C111 (64.9%)77 (71.3%)Ref.
    C/T55 (32.2%)30 (27.8%)0.760.44 - 1.320.331
    T/T5 (2.9%)1 (0.9%)0.340.04 - 3.110.336
  Recessive model
    C/C111 (64.9%)77 (71.3%)Ref.
    C/T or T/T60 (35.1%)31 (28.7%)0.730.42 - 1.260.254
  Allele contrast
    C277 (81.0%)184 (85.2%)Ref.
    T65 (19.0%)32 (14.8%)0.740.46 - 1.190.216
Males
  Genotype
    C/C77 (69.4%)50 (69.4%)Ref.
    C/T32 (28.8%)21 (29.2%)1.040.53 - 2.050.914
    T/T2 (1.8%)1 (1.4%)0.950.08 - 12.070.968
  Recessive model
    C/C77 (69.4%)50 (69.4%)Ref.
    C/T or T/T34 (30.6%)22 (30.6%)1.030.53 - 2.020.923
  Allele contrast
    C186 (83.8%)121 (84.0%)Ref.
    T36 (16.2%)23 (16.0%)1.020.57 - 1.850.940
Females
  Genotype
    C/C34 (56.7%)27 (75.0%)Ref.
    C/T23 (38.3%)9 (25.0%)0.420.16 - 1.090.076
    T/T3 (5.0%)0 (0.0%)---
  Recessive model
    C/C34 (56.7%)27 (75.0%)Ref.
    C/T or T/T26 (43.3%)9 (25.0%)0.440.18 - 1.080.074
  Allele contrast
    C91 (75.8%)63 (87.5%)Ref.
    T29 (24.2%)9 (12.5%)0.410.18 - 0.950.038

Statistical significance for differences in genotype, G-containing genotype and allelic frequencies between patients with early onset psoriasis and healthy controls: 1) χ2 = 2.047, df = 2, P = 0.359; χ2 = 1.227, df = 1, P = 0.268; χ2 = 1.619, df = 1, P = 0.203 among the entire cohort; 2) χ2 = 0.047, df = 2, P = 0.977; χ2 = 0.000, df = 1, P = 0.991; χ2 = 0.004, df = 1, P = 0.951 among males; 3) χ2 = 4.190, df = 2, P = 0.123; χ2 = 3.264, df = 1, P = 0.071; χ2 = 3.858, df = 1, P = 0.049 among females. *Data are number of subjects and percentage (%). †Adjusted for age and gender. ‡Statistically significant P values. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Table 4

Distribution of GJB-2 SNP Genotypes Among Patients With Late-Onset Psoriasis and Healthy Controls According to Subject’s Gender

Controls*Late onset*OR95% CIP value
Total
  Genotype
    C/C111 (64.9%)50 (76.9%)Ref.
    C/T55 (32.2%)13 (20.0%)0.560.26 - 1.190.134
    T/T5 (2.9%)2 (3.1%)0.640.10 - 3.960.632
  Recessive model
    C/C111 (64.9%)50 (76.9%)Ref.
    C/T or T/T60 (35.1%)15 (23.1%)0.570.27 - 1.170.127
  Allele contrast
    C277 (81.0%)113 (86.9%)Ref.
    T65 (19.0%)17 (13.1%)0.630.33 - 1.190.155
Males
  Genotype
    C/C77 (69.4%)34 (87.2%)Ref.
    C/T32 (28.8%)4 (10.3%)0.220.07 - 0.770.017
    T/T2 (1.8%)1 (2.6%)0.430.03 - 6.710.547
  Recessive model
    C/C77 (69.4%)34 (87.2%)Ref.
    C/T or T/T34 (30.6%)5 (12.8%)0.240.08 - 0.770.016
  Allele contrast
    C186 (83.8%)72 (92.3%)Ref.
    T36 (16.2%)6 (7.7%)0.310.12 - 0.850.023
Females
  Genotype
    C/C34 (56.7%)16 (61.5%)Ref.
    C/T23 (38.3%)9 (34.6%)1.370.45 - 4.190.583
    T/T3 (5.0%)1 (3.8%)0.990.09 - 11.680.999
  Recessive model
    C/C34 (56.7%)16 (61.5%)Ref.
    C/T or T/T26 (43.3%)10 (38.5%)1.320.45 - 3.860.618
  Allele contrast
    C91 (75.8%)41 (78.8%)Ref.
    T29 (24.2%)11 (21.1%)1.180.49 - 2.820.668

Statistical significance for differences in genotype, G-containing genotype and allelic frequencies between patients with late onset psoriasis and healthy controls: 1) χ2 = 3.418, df = 2, P = 0.181; χ2 = 3.134, df = 1, P = 0.077; χ2 = 2.307, df = 1, P = 0.129 among the entire cohort; 2) χ2 = 5.469, df = 2, P = 0.065; χ2 = 4.758, df = 1, P = 0.029; χ2 = 3.483, df = 1, P = 0.062 among males; 3) χ2 = 0.193, df = 2, P = 0.908; χ2 = 0.177, df = 1, P = 0.674; χ2 = 0.185, df = 1, P = 0.668 among females. *Data are number of subjects and percentage (%). †Adjusted for age and gender. ‡Statistically significant P values. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Statistical significance for differences in genotype, G-containing genotype and allelic frequencies between patients with early onset psoriasis and healthy controls: 1) χ2 = 2.047, df = 2, P = 0.359; χ2 = 1.227, df = 1, P = 0.268; χ2 = 1.619, df = 1, P = 0.203 among the entire cohort; 2) χ2 = 0.047, df = 2, P = 0.977; χ2 = 0.000, df = 1, P = 0.991; χ2 = 0.004, df = 1, P = 0.951 among males; 3) χ2 = 4.190, df = 2, P = 0.123; χ2 = 3.264, df = 1, P = 0.071; χ2 = 3.858, df = 1, P = 0.049 among females. *Data are number of subjects and percentage (%). †Adjusted for age and gender. ‡Statistically significant P values. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval. Statistical significance for differences in genotype, G-containing genotype and allelic frequencies between patients with late onset psoriasis and healthy controls: 1) χ2 = 3.418, df = 2, P = 0.181; χ2 = 3.134, df = 1, P = 0.077; χ2 = 2.307, df = 1, P = 0.129 among the entire cohort; 2) χ2 = 5.469, df = 2, P = 0.065; χ2 = 4.758, df = 1, P = 0.029; χ2 = 3.483, df = 1, P = 0.062 among males; 3) χ2 = 0.193, df = 2, P = 0.908; χ2 = 0.177, df = 1, P = 0.674; χ2 = 0.185, df = 1, P = 0.668 among females. *Data are number of subjects and percentage (%). †Adjusted for age and gender. ‡Statistically significant P values. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval. Within female gender early-onset psoriasis, a statistically significant higher frequency of the T allele was suggested in controls vs. patients (χ2 = 3.858, df = 1, P = 0.049) (Table 3), even though no statistically significant difference was detected regarding genotypes (χ2 = 4.190, df = 2, P = 0.123) and relevant higher frequency for C/T genotype in controls vs. patients was only marginally non-significant (χ2 = 3.264, df = 1, P = 0.071). In Table 4, we present data regarding patients with late-onset psoriasis. In late-onset psoriasis vulgaris cohort, no statistically significant differences were ascertained regarding genotypes (χ2 = 3.418, df = 2, P = 0.181) or allele contrast (χ2 = 2.307, df = 1, P = 0.129), while the higher frequency of C/T genotype in controls was marginally non-significant (χ2 = 3.134, df = 1, P = 0.077). In female gender late-onset psoriasis, no statistically significant differences were detected (χ2 = 0.193, df = 2, P = 0.908 for genotypes, χ2 = 0.177, df = 1, P = 0.674 for recessive model, χ2 = 0.185, df = 1, P = 0.668 for allele contrast). In contrast, in male gender late-onset psoriasis, the observed differences were significant; more precisely, the higher frequency of C/T genotype in controls was statistically significant (χ2 = 4.758, df = 1, P = 0.029 for recessive model), while differences for genotype (χ2 = 5.469, df = 2, P = 0.065) or allele contrast (χ2 = 3.483, df = 1, P = 0.062) were marginally non-significant (Table 4). Consequently, presence of the C/T genotype, that is interaction of C and T alleles in males might be considered as protective gene component against the appearance of late-onset psoriasis, while presence of the T allele in females might block histogenesis of early-onset psoriasis lesions.

Discussion

Recent experiments in juvenile and adult mice suggested the maintenance and insistence of connexin 26 expression that results in obstinacy of an ulcerative situation of the hyperproliferative epidermis. Kruppel-like factor 4 (Klf4) helps establish the epidermal barrier in utero [32]. The above Klf4 activity is simultaneously expressed with Klf4 caused proximal Cx26 promoter transcription repression, leading the downregulation of Cx26 contribution. Heterozygous involucrin Cx26 keratinocytes ATP release was clearly more intensive than that of mice controls, thus upregulating epidermal differentiation and therefore being implicated in the histogenesis of the hyperkeratotic psoriasiform plaques [32]. Consequently, the possible role of carbenoxolone (an ATP-release suppressing blocker of gap junction and hemi-channel) in hyperkeratotic diseases management has to be searched in the future. Immunocytochemical studies demonstrated the upregulation of Cx26 expression in psoriatic plaques [20, 31, 40]. Transcriptome analysis in psoriasis has indicated upregulation of GJB2 [41]. Psoriatic plaques cutaneous flora modifications may trigger upgrade connexin26 activity [20, 42]. S. aureus isolated peptidoglycan (in contrast to that isolated from the skin commensal E. epidermidis) stimulates HaCa T cells to strengthen Cx26 expression. The above peptidoglycan action was correlated with modifying IL-6 induction, whose activity was blocked by connexin hemichannel blockers [20, 43]. The DFNB1 locus at chromosome 13q11-q12 contains two genes: GJB2 (gap junction protein beta 2) and GJB6 (gap junction protein beta 6), whose mutations constitute the most frequent causes of (autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL). More precisely, the GJB2 SNP rs3751385 was included among the statistically significant more frequent SNPs in deaf patients vs. healthy controls [44-47]. GJB1 and GJB3 genes have also been found mutated in patients suffering from either non-syndromic or syndromic deafness, suggesting possible involvement of the corresponding proteins connexin 32 (GJB1) and connexin 31 (GJB3) in embryology, histogenesis and function of the auditory system structural components [48]. In a case-control study in psoriasis vulgaris in a Chinese Han population, GJB2 rs72474224 SNP was suggested statistically significantly different between patients and controls, with the T allele being preferentially associated with psoriasis appearance susceptibility. Rs72474224 may cause conversion of valine to isoleucine at amino acid 37 of the GJB2 protein. Isoleucine has an additional methyl group compared to valine and this structural peculiarity may influence the functional mission of the Cx26 gap junction channel pore [37]. In another study in a Chinese population, a decreased frequency of the GJB2 rs3751385 C allele in psoriatic patients was statistically significant [38]. In our study, we observed statistically significant: lower frequency of the C/T genotype in male patients with late-onset psoriasis vulgaris and lower frequency of the T allele in female patients with early-onset form of the disease. GJB2 rs3751385 C/T is located at the 3’UTR region of GJB2 gene. 3’UTRs are considerably longer than their 5’UTR counterparts, suggesting a more significant potential for gene regulation, as alternative polyadenylation, transcript cleavage and mRNA nuclear export [49, 50]. 2-methoxyestradiol, an endogenous metabolite of estrogen is an in vitro inhibitor of both angiogenesis and proliferation and migration of endothelial cells; all of the above occur in psoriasis. This involvement of sex hormones in psoriasis vulgaris may provide some ground for interpretation of the differences in distribution of genotypes in different genders [51, 52]. Early-onset psoriatic patients carriers of the HLA-Cw6 allele and late-onset psoriatic patients are characterized by clinical, demographic, immunocytochemical and genetic differences [53, 54]. Our results are incorporated in the above setting of the two distinct subtypes of psoriasis vulgaris [55]. On condition that all other genetic or environmental factors remain stable, the presence and possible interaction between the two alleles in heterozygous males may be considered as a protective gene component against late-onset psoriasis appearance while ascertainment of the T allele in females might obstruct the appearance of early-onset psoriasis. The number of patients and matched controls included in our study constitutes a relatively small size sample. Further additional studies would be extremely interesting and are needed to reinforce our reported results.
  53 in total

1.  A missense mutation in connexin26, D66H, causes mutilating keratoderma with sensorineural deafness (Vohwinkel's syndrome) in three unrelated families.

Authors:  E Maestrini; B P Korge; J Ocaña-Sierra; E Calzolari; S Cambiaghi; P M Scudder; A Hovnanian; A P Monaco; C S Munro
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  The 3' untranslated region of messenger RNA: A molecular 'hotspot' for pathology?

Authors:  B Conne; A Stutz; J D Vassalli
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 3.  Regulatory functions of 3'UTRs.

Authors:  E A Grzybowska; A Wilczynska; J A Siedlecki
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  GJB2 gene mutations in Slovak hearing-impaired patients of Caucasian origin: spectrum, frequencies and SNP analysis.

Authors:  G Minarik; E Ferakova; A Ficek; H Polakova; L Kadasi
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 5.  Connexins: a connection with the skin.

Authors:  G Richard
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.960

6.  Upregulation of connexin 26 is a feature of keratinocyte differentiation in hyperproliferative epidermis, vaginal epithelium, and buccal epithelium.

Authors:  T Lucke; R Choudhry; R Thom; I S Selmer; A D Burden; M B Hodgins
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  Psoriasis patients who are homozygous for the HLA-Cw*0602 allele have a 2.5-fold increased risk of developing psoriasis compared with Cw6 heterozygotes.

Authors:  J E Gudjonsson; A Karason; A Antonsdottir; E H Runarsdottir; V B Hauksson; R Upmanyu; J Gulcher; K Stefansson; H Valdimarsson
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of Cx26 disorders: Bart-Pumphrey syndrome is caused by a novel missense mutation in GJB2.

Authors:  Gabriele Richard; Nkecha Brown; Akemi Ishida-Yamamoto; Alfons Krol
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.551

9.  Expression profiles of the connexin genes, Gjb1 and Gjb3, in the developing mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Núria López-Bigas; Maria L Arbonés; Xavier Estivill; Lionel Simonneau
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.882

10.  A novel GJB2 (connexin 26) mutation, F142L, in a patient with unusual mucocutaneous findings and deafness.

Authors:  Chester W Brown; Moise L Levy; Catherine M Flaitz; Barbara S Reid; Spiros Manolidis; Adelaide A Hebert; Matthew M Bender; Heidi A Heilstedt; Katie S Plunkett; Ping Fang; Benjamin B Roa; Pil Chung; Hsiao-Yuan Tang; Gabriele Richard; Raye L Alford
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 8.551

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Psoriasis: An Immunogenetic Perspective.

Authors:  Ayca Kocaaga; Mustafa Kocaaga
Journal:  Glob Med Genet       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  Glycyrrhetinic Acid Protects Renal Tubular Cells against Oxidative Injury via Reciprocal Regulation of JNK-Connexin 43-Thioredoxin 1 Signaling.

Authors:  Yao Zhou; Leiping Gao; Ping Xia; Jing Zhao; Wei Li; Yufeng Zhou; Qingxue Wei; Qijing Wu; Qi Wu; Dongdong Sun; Kun Gao
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 3.  Connexins and the Epithelial Tissue Barrier: A Focus on Connexin 26.

Authors:  Laura Garcia-Vega; Erin M O'Shaughnessy; Ahmad Albuloushi; Patricia E Martin
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-14

4.  Evaluation of the relationship of IL-17A and IL-17F gene polymorphisms with the response to treatment in psoriatic patients using biological drugs: a case-control study in patients in Eastern Turkey.

Authors:  Hatice Uce Ozkol; Gokhan Gorgisen; Can Ates; Halil Özkol; Yasin Tülüce; Hulya Savas; İsmail Musab Gulacar
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 1.837

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.