Literature DB >> 31522855

Differences in Diagnostic Properties Between Standard and Enrichment Culture Techniques Used in Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Shintaro Watanabe1, Naomi Kobayashi2, Akito Tomoyama3, Hyonmin Choe1, Etsuko Yamazaki3, Yutaka Inaba1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Culture-negative infections can complicate the diagnosis and management of orthopedic infections, particularly periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). This study aimed to identify differences in rate of detection of infection and organisms between cultured using standard and enriched methods.
METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluated PJI samples obtained between January 2013 and December 2017 at Yokohama City University Hospital. Samples were assessed using standard and enrichment culture techniques. White blood cell counts, C-reactive protein levels, type of microorganism (coagulase-positive or coagulase-negative), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus were investigated.
RESULTS: A total of 151 PJI samples were included in the analysis; of these, 68 (45.0%) were positive after standard culture while 83 (55.0%) were positive only after enrichment culture. The mean white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels were significantly lower in the enrichment culture group than in the standard culture group (P < .01). The rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci was significantly higher in the enrichment culture group than in the standard culture group (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: The enrichment culture method has a higher rate of detection of infection than standard culture techniques and should, therefore, be considered when diagnosing orthopedic infections, particularly PJI.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection; enrichment culture; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus; periprosthetic joint infection; standard culture

Year:  2019        PMID: 31522855     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of an automated DNA extraction and 16S rDNA real time PCR/sequencing diagnostic method using optimized reagents with culture during a 15-month study using specimens from sterile body sites.

Authors:  Konrad Egli; Martin Risch; Lorenz Risch; Thomas Bodmer
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.465

2.  Inflammation and nutrition based screening tests for detection of infection in cases of rapid hip destruction.

Authors:  Koki Abe; Hyonmin Choe; Masatoshi Oba; Taro Tezuka; Hiroyuki Ike; Naomi Kobayashi; Yutaka Inaba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.