Literature DB >> 31522572

How do team experience and relationships shape new divisions of labour in robot-assisted surgery? A realist investigation.

Rebecca Randell, Joanne Greenhalgh1, Jon Hindmarsh2, Stephanie Honey, Alan Pearman, Natasha Alvarado1, Dawn Dowding3.   

Abstract

Safe and successful surgery depends on effective teamwork between professional groups, each playing their part in a complex division of labour. This article reports the first empirical examination of how introduction of robot-assisted surgery changes the division of labour within surgical teams and impacts teamwork and patient safety. Data collection and analysis was informed by realist principles. Interviews were conducted with surgical teams across nine UK hospitals and, in a multi-site case study across four hospitals, data were collected using a range of methods, including ethnographic observation, video recording and semi-structured interviews. Our findings reveal that as the robot enables the surgeon to do more, the surgical assistant's role becomes less clearly defined. Robot-assisted surgery also introduces new tasks for the surgical assistant and scrub practitioner, in terms of communicating information to the surgeon. However, the use of robot-assisted surgery does not redistribute work in a uniform way; contextual factors of individual experience and team relationships shape changes to the division of labour. For instance, in some situations, scrub practitioners take on the role of supporting inexperienced surgical assistants. These changes in the division of labour do not persist when team members return to operations that are not robot-assisted. This study contributes to wider literature on divisions of labour in healthcare and how this is impacted by the introduction of new technologies. In particular, we emphasise the need to pay attention to often neglected micro-level contextual factors. This can highlight behaviours that can be promoted to benefit patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  division of labour; ethnography; interprofessional working; negotiated order; professional boundaries; realist methods; robot-assisted surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31522572     DOI: 10.1177/1363459319874115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health (London)        ISSN: 1363-4593


  3 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting workflow in robot-assisted surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jannie Lysgaard Poulsen; Birgitte Bruun; Doris Oestergaard; Lene Spanager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Role of requests and communication breakdowns in the coordination of teamwork: a video-based observational study of hybrid operating rooms.

Authors:  Jonas Ivarsson; Mikaela Åberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings.

Authors:  Julia Schreyer; Amelie Koch; Annika Herlemann; Armin Becker; Boris Schlenker; Ken Catchpole; Matthias Weigl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.