Literature DB >> 31522326

The Principle of "Damage Exclusion" as a Benchmark in Catholic Discussions of Homologous Artificial Insemination.

Sonsoles Navarro-Rubio1, Francisco Güell2.   

Abstract

The Catholic perspective rejects assisted human reproduction techniques, but the morality of artificial insemination (AI) is open for discussion. This article aims to analyze the morality of AI from a new angle, namely whether these interventions exclude all possibility of damaging the human embryo and the offspring's health. The scientific evidence about the children's health who are born through AI allows us to affirm that the procedures do not comply with the principle of damage exclusion: AI does not exclude all possibility of damaging the embryo and impacting the health and exposure to disease of the offspring born through these techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted human reproduction; Catholic morality; Gamete manipulation; Human embryo; Offspring’s health

Year:  2021        PMID: 31522326     DOI: 10.1007/s10943-019-00913-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Relig Health        ISSN: 0022-4197


  11 in total

1.  In vitro fertilization and surrogate motherhood: the Jewish view.

Authors:  Fred Rosner
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  1983

2.  Perinatal outcome of ICSI pregnancies compared with a matched group of natural conception pregnancies in Flanders (Belgium): a cohort study.

Authors:  Willem Ombelet; Karen Peeraer; Petra De Sutter; Jan Gerris; Eugene Bosmans; Guy Martens; Gunther Ruyssinck; Paul Defoort; Geert Molenberghs; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  Treating Infertility with Transplantation: Theological views on whether Infertility is a Disease.

Authors:  Aasim I Padela; Kristel Clayville
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Maternal use of fertility drugs and risk of cancer in children--a nationwide population-based cohort study in Denmark.

Authors:  Marie Hargreave; Allan Jensen; Thor Schütt Svane Nielsen; Emilie Palmgren Colov; Klaus Kaae Andersen; Anja Pinborg; Susanne Krüger Kjaer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Use of clomiphene citrate and birth defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2005.

Authors:  J Reefhuis; M A Honein; L A Schieve; S A Rasmussen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Health of children born after ovulation induction.

Authors:  Reija Klemetti; Tiina Sevón; Mika Gissler; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Birth defects in medically assisted reproduction pregnancies in the city of Barcelona.

Authors:  Rosa Gutarra-Vilchez; Elena Santamariña-Rubio; Joaquin Salvador; Antoni Borrell
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  Islam, Assisted Reproduction, and the Bioethical Aftermath.

Authors:  Marcia C Inhorn; Soraya Tremayne
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2016-04

9.  Ovulation induction/intrauterine insemination in infertile couples is associated with low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  Marco Gaudoin; Richard Dobbie; Alan Finlayson; James Chalmers; Iain T Cameron; Richard Fleming
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Perinatal outcomes of intrauterine insemination/clomiphene pregnancies represent an intermediate risk group compared with in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and naturally conceived pregnancies.

Authors:  Woei Bing Poon; Wee Bin Lian
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 1.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.