Literature DB >> 31522000

A feasible experimental framework for field calibration of portable light-scattering aerosol monitors: Case of TSI DustTrak.

Zhiyuan Li1, Wenwei Che2, Alexis K H Lau3, Jimmy C H Fung4, Changqing Lin5, Xingcheng Lu6.   

Abstract

Portable light-scattering aerosol monitors (PLSAMs) can supplement existing air quality monitoring networks through measuring air pollutant exposure concentrations at high spatiotemporal resolution. However, data collected by PLSAMs are often subject to the simplicity of measurement principle which may lead to errors compared to the regulatory data observed at fixed-site air quality monitoring stations. The main objective of this study was to develop a feasible experimental framework to assess the influence of key factors (e.g., relative humidity (RH)) on the performance of PLSAMs in the real-world conditions. Following the proposed framework, the accuracy and precision of the TSI DustTrak aerosol monitor were evaluated through side-by-side comparison with the stationary reference instruments (SRIs) while taking characteristics of particles, RH, and the concentration range into consideration. DustTrak generally demonstrated low accuracy but high precision in measuring PM2.5 concentrations at the two selected stations. Three calibration models between DustTrak and the SRIs were used to bias correct the DustTrak PM2.5 measurements. The RH-adjusted linear regression calibration method led to better calibration results than the simple linear regression method and the RH-adjusted empirical method, with CV R2 values higher than 0.97, root mean square error less than 1.0 μg/m3, and accuracy values at 3% for two DustTraks. The proposed experimental framework can be extended to field calibration of various types of PLSAMs, and the obtained calibration results can promote a more accurate investigation of particle air pollution using these PLSAMs.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Accuracy; Exposure assessment; PM(2.5); Precision

Year:  2019        PMID: 31522000     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  2 in total

1.  A Comparison of Particulate Exposure Levels during Taxi, Bus, and Metro Commuting among Four Chinese Megacities.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Zhengdong Huang; Jiacheng Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Development and Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Portable PM2.5 Monitor for Mobile Deployment.

Authors:  Mingjian Chen; Weichang Yuan; Chang Cao; Colby Buehler; Drew R Gentner; Xuhui Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.