| Literature DB >> 31521698 |
Jan Haaker1, Stephen Maren2, Marta Andreatta3, Christian J Merz4, Jan Richter5, S Helene Richter6, Shira Meir Drexler4, Maren D Lange7, Kay Jüngling7, Frauke Nees8, Thomas Seidenbecher7, Miquel A Fullana9, Carsten T Wotjak10, Tina B Lonsdorf11.
Abstract
Translational neuroscience bridges insights from specific mechanisms in rodents to complex functions in humans and is key to advance our general understanding of central nervous function. A prime example of translational research is the study of cross-species mechanisms that underlie responding to learned threats, by employing Pavlovian fear conditioning protocols in rodents and humans. Hitherto, evidence for (and critique of) these cross-species comparisons in fear conditioning research was based on theoretical viewpoints. Here, we provide a perspective to substantiate these theoretical concepts with empirical considerations of cross-species methodology. This meta-research perspective is expected to foster cross-species comparability and reproducibility to ultimately facilitate successful transfer of results from basic science into clinical applications.Entities:
Keywords: Associative learning; FPS; Fear conditioning; Fear extinction; Heat-rate; Human; Individual differences; Meta-research; Methods; Paradigm; Rodent; SCR; Startle; Translation; Treezing
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31521698 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev ISSN: 0149-7634 Impact factor: 8.989