Literature DB >> 31521682

CABG Improves Outcomes in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: 10-Year Follow-Up of the STICH Trial.

Jonathan G Howlett1, Amanda Stebbins2, Mark C Petrie3, Pardeep S Jhund3, Serenella Castelvecchio4, Alexander Cherniavsky5, Carla A Sueta6, Ambuj Roy7, Ileana L Piña8, Raphael Wurm9, Mark H Drazner10, Bert Andersson11, Carmen Batlle12, Michele Senni13, Lukasz Chrzanowski14, Bela Merkely15, Peter Carson16, Patrice M Desvigne-Nickens17, Kerry L Lee2, Eric J Velazquez18, Hussein R Al-Khalidi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated the impact of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on first and recurrent hospitalization in this population.
BACKGROUND: In the STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial, CABG reduced all-cause death and hospitalization in patients with and ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction <35%.
METHODS: A total of 1,212 patients were randomized (610 to CABG + optimal medical therapy [CABG] and 602 to optimal medical therapy alone [MED] alone) and followed for a median of 9.8 years. All-cause and cause-specific hospitalizations were analyzed as time-to-first-event and as recurrent event analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 1,212 patients, 757 died (62.4%) and 732 (60.4%) were hospitalized at least once, for a total of 2,549 total all-cause hospitalizations. Most hospitalizations (66.2%) were for cardiovascular causes, of which approximately one-half (907 or 52.9%) were for heart failure. More than 70% of all hospitalizations (1,817 or 71.3%) were recurrent events. The CABG group experienced fewer all-cause hospitalizations in the time-to-first-event (349 CABG vs. 383 MED, adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74 to 0.98; p = 0.03) and in recurrent event analyses (1,199 CABG vs. 1,350 MED, HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.94; p < 0.001). This was driven by fewer total cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations (744 vs. 968; p < 0.001, adjusted HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.81; p = 0.001), the majority of which were due to HF (395 vs. 512; p < 0.001, adjusted HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.52-0.89; p = 0.005). We did not observe a difference in non-CV events.
CONCLUSIONS: CABG reduces all-cause, CV, and HF hospitalizations in time-to-first-event and recurrent event analyses. (Comparison of Surgical and Medical Treatment for Congestive Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease [STICH]; NCT00023595).
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery bypass grafting; heart failure; hospitalization; ischemic cardiomyopathy; morbidity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31521682     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Heart Fail        ISSN: 2213-1779            Impact factor:   12.035


  8 in total

Review 1.  Complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization: definitions, assessment and outcomes.

Authors:  Prakriti Gaba; Bernard J Gersh; Ziad A Ali; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Myocardial Infarction in the ISCHEMIA Trial: Impact of Different Definitions on Incidence, Prognosis, and Treatment Comparisons.

Authors:  Bernard R Chaitman; Karen P Alexander; Derek D Cyr; Jeffrey S Berger; Harmony R Reynolds; Sripal Bangalore; William E Boden; Renato D Lopes; Marcin Demkow; Gian Piero Perna; Robert K Riezebos; Edward O McFalls; Subhash Banerjee; Akshay Bagai; Gilbert Gosselin; Sean M O'Brien; Frank W Rockhold; David D Waters; Kristian A Thygesen; Gregg W Stone; Harvey D White; David J Maron; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Extracellular Vesicles in Comorbidities Associated with Ischaemic Heart Disease: Focus on Sex, an Overlooked Factor.

Authors:  Claudia Penna; Saveria Femminò; Giuseppe Alloatti; Maria F Brizzi; Tommaso Angelone; Pasquale Pagliaro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Performance of Coronary Angiography in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction and No Prior Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Óscar M Peiró; Maria Ferrero; Alba Romeu; Anna Carrasquer; Gil Bonet; Mohsen Mohandes; Alberto Pernigotti; Alfredo Bardají
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Long-term outcome of surgical revascularization in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction-a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Helga B Brynjarsdottir; Arni Johnsen; Alexandra A Heimisdottir; Sunna Rún Heidarsdottir; Anders Jeppsson; Martin I Sigurdsson; Tomas Gudbjartsson
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 6.  Left Main Coronary Artery Disease-Current Management and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Emil Julian Dąbrowski; Marcin Kożuch; Sławomir Dobrzycki
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Analysis of susceptibility genes and myocardial infarction risk correlation of ischemic cardiomyopathy based on bioinformatics.

Authors:  Nai Zhang; Chuang Yang; Yu-Juan Liu; Peng Zeng; Tao Gong; Lu Tao; Xin-Ai Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.005

8.  Early and Long-Term Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction and a Giant Left Ventricle.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Yefan Jiang; Qingpeng Wang; Rui Tian; Dashuai Wang; Xionggang Jiang; Nianguo Dong; Si Chen; Xinzhong Chen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-09-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.