Literature DB >> 31521443

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using High-Viscosity Cement is Associated With Higher Odds of Revision for Aseptic Loosening.

Leonard T Buller1, Vindhya Rao1, Yu-Fen Chiu2, Denis Nam3, Alexander S McLawhorn1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening (AL) is the most common reason for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). An association between high-viscosity cement (HVC) and AL has been suggested by small, uncontrolled, case series. This study sought to determine whether HVC use during primary TKA is independently associated with AL requiring revision.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected institutional knee registry to identify all primary TKAs from January 2007 to December 2016. Patients with less than 2 years of follow-up were excluded. Cement type was divided into 2 groups: HVC and low-viscosity cement. Potential confounders including age, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, antibiotics in the cement, and implant type were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether HVC is independently associated with revision for AL.
RESULTS: In total, 10,014 patients were included. Revision for AL was significantly higher in the HVC cohort (91/4790; 1.9%) vs the low-viscosity cement cohort (48/5224; 0.92%) (P < .001). Logistic regression demonstrated HVC to be independently associated with higher odds of revision for AL (odds ratio 2.26, 95% confidence interval 1.58-3.22, P < .001). Younger age was also associated with higher odds of revision for AL (odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.98, P < .001). Body mass index, gender, laterality, preoperative diagnosis, and antibiotics in the cement were not associated with revision for AL. Implant manufacturer, implant design, and cement brand all impacted the odds of undergoing revision for AL.
CONCLUSION: Although HVC is an attractive option for use in primary TKA, this appropriately controlled study demonstrates higher odds of revision for AL when using HVC with multiple different implant types.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aseptic loosening; cement-implant interface; early aseptic total knee failure; high-viscosity cement; revision total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31521443     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Remarks on Some Relevant Recent Reflections about Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-03

2.  Pulsatile Lavage Systems with High Impact Pressure and High Flow Produce Cleaner Cancellous Bone Prior to Cementation in Cemented Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin Knappe; Rudi G Bitsch; Mareike Schonhoff; Tilman Walker; Tobias Renkawitz; Sebastian Jaeger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  High rate of tibial debonding and failure in a popular knee replacement : a follow-up review.

Authors:  David Keohane; Gerard A Sheridan; Eric Masterson
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-06

4.  Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report.

Authors:  Matthew L Brown; Pooya Javidan; Sam Early; William Bugbee
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-08-25

5.  Tibial Baseplate-Cement Interface Debonding in the ATTUNE Total Knee Arthroplasty System.

Authors:  Daniel Torino; Christopher Damsgaard; David J Kolessar; Daniel S Hayes; Brian Foster; Jesse Constantino; Jove Graham
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-09-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.