Literature DB >> 31520622

Establishing and Maintaining Research Integrity at Academic Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities.

Janet D Robishaw1, David L DeMets2, Sarah K Wood3, Phillip M Boiselle4, Charles H Hennekens5.   

Abstract

Integrity and trust are essential attributes of medical researchers. Research misconduct represents clear and present dangers to academic institutions and their faculty, residents, students, and staff. To achieve and maintain public trust, medical researchers must achieve and maintain research integrity. To do so requires synchronicity and collaboration between and within academic institutions. Substantial failures to maintain research integrity by institutional leadership will lead to increasing demands to do so from the funding organizations and the general public. This, in turn, will lead to avoidable consequences of substantial penalties, financial and otherwise, adverse publicity, and reputational damage. Researchers must self-regulate to avoid pitfalls, including those created by changes in the medical care delivery system that have decreased the influence of health care providers and increased the influence of outside legal and business interests. Our common goal should be to return public trust in our research enterprise that has done so much good for so many, but requires the establishment and maintenance of vigilance to establish and maintain research integrity.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic institutions; Research integrity; Transparency

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31520622      PMCID: PMC7304547          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  6 in total

1.  Overdue: a US advisory board for research integrity.

Authors:  C K Gunsalus; Marcia K McNutt; Brian C Martinson; Larry R Faulkner; Robert M Nerem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Institutional Responsibility and the Flawed Genomic Biomarkers at Duke University: A Missed Opportunity for Transparency and Accountability.

Authors:  David L DeMets; Thomas R Fleming; Gail Geller; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Rethinking retractions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Brainard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Nine pitfalls of research misconduct.

Authors:  C K Gunsalus; Aaron D Robinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Lessons from the Darsee affair.

Authors:  A S Relman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Ten Simple Rules for Protecting Research Integrity.

Authors:  David M Shaw; Thomas C Erren
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.