Literature DB >> 31520485

The relationship between dental implant papilla and dental implant mucosa around single-tooth implant in the esthetic area: A retrospective study.

Julia Garabetyan1,2, Jacques Malet1,2, Stéphane Kerner1,2, Laurent Detzen1,2, Maria Clotilde Carra1,2,3, Philippe Bouchard1,2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was (a) to evaluate the relationship between dental implant mucosa and dental implant papilla levels; and (b) to identify the clinical parameters associated with peri-implant soft tissue stability over time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study on a cohort of patients seeking a single-tooth implant therapy in a private practice in the Paris area. Two independent examiners analyzed photographs and radiographs taken the day of definitive crown load (baseline) and the last follow-up visit (at least 12 months later) in order to measure four peri-implant soft and hard tissue parameters.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients corresponding to 90 implants were analyzed. During a mean follow-up of 53.88 months, five implants (5.6%) presented with an apical displacement of the mid-facial marginal mucosal level of at least 1 mm. Changes in the mid-facial mucosa level were explained by changes in (a) the keratinized tissue height over time (p < .0001); (b) changes in the papilla height (p < .0001); and (c) by the periodontal phenotype (p = .007). A significant difference between papillae that gain in height (n = 85) and papilla that lost height (n = 78) was observed concerning (a) the timing of the implant placement (p = .019); and (b) the presence of an incomplete papilla fill (distance from the top of the papilla to the contact point) at baseline (p = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: The present findings indicate a dependent association between dental implant mucosa and dental implant papilla levels. Stability of peri-implant soft tissues depends on periodontal phenotype, keratinized tissue height and papilla height.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental esthetic; dental implant; papilla; peri-implant soft tissue; recession

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31520485     DOI: 10.1111/clr.13536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

Review 1.  Etiology and Treatment of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Dehiscences: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Charalampos Kaddas; Eirini Papamanoli; Yiorgos A Bobetsis
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Average and Maximum Papilla Heights around Dental Implants in the Anterior Maxillary Region: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Gholam Ali Gholami; Soheil Hariri; Reza Amid; Leyla Roghanizadeh; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Amirreza Mehdizadeh; Navid Youssefi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-02-11

Review 3.  The influence of thin as compared to thick peri-implant soft tissues on aesthetic outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan P Bienz; Miha Pirc; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Ronald E Jung; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.021

4.  Effect of peri-implant mucosal thickness on esthetic outcomes and the efficacy of soft tissue augmentation procedures: Consensus report of group 2 of the SEPA/DGI/OF workshop.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Kathrin Becker; Stefan P Bienz; Christer Dahlin; Nikos Donos; Christian Hammächer; Gerhard Iglhaut; Antonio Liñares; Alberto Ortiz-Vigón; Nerea Sanchez; Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez; Daniel S Thoma; Cristina Valles; Dietmar Weng; José Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.021

5.  Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part II: Soft Tissues.

Authors:  Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Naia Bustamante-Hernández; Carlos Labaig-Rueda; Antonio Fons-Font; Lucía Fernández-Estevan; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.