Literature DB >> 31520421

Variation in the practice of tracheal intubation in Europe after traumatic brain injury: a prospective cohort study.

B Y Gravesteijn1, C A Sewalt2, A Ercole3, F Lecky4, D Menon5, E W Steyerberg6, A I R Maas7, H F Lingsma2, M Klimek8.   

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury patients frequently undergo tracheal intubation. We aimed to assess current intubation practice in Europe and identify variation in practice. We analysed data from patients with traumatic brain injury included in the prospective cohort study collaborative European neurotrauma effectiveness research in traumatic brain injury (CENTER-TBI) in 45 centres in 16 European countries. We included patients who were transported to hospital by emergency medical services. We used mixed-effects multinomial regression to quantify the effects on pre-hospital or in-hospital tracheal intubation of the following: patient characteristics; injury characteristics; centre; and trauma system characteristics. A total of 3843 patients were included. Of these, 1322 (34%) had their tracheas intubated; 839 (22%) pre-hospital and 483 (13%) in-hospital. The fit of the model with only patient characteristics predicting intubation was good (Nagelkerke R2 64%). The probability of tracheal intubation increased with the following: younger age; lower pre-hospital or emergency department GCS; higher abbreviated injury scale scores (head and neck, thorax and chest, face or abdomen abbreviated injury score); and one or more unreactive pupils. The adjusted median odds ratio for intubation between two randomly chosen centres was 3.1 (95%CI 2.1-4.3) for pre-hospital intubation, and 2.7 (95%CI 1.9-3.5) for in-hospital intubation. Furthermore, the presence of an anaesthetist was independently associated with more pre-hospital intubation (OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.3-6.6), in contrast to the presence of ambulance personnel who are allowed to intubate (OR 0.5, 95%CI 0.3-0.8). In conclusion, patient and injury characteristics are key drivers of tracheal intubation. Between-centre differences were also substantial. Further studies are needed to improve the evidence base supporting recommendations for tracheal intubation.
© 2019 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; guideline; practice variation; tracheal intubation; traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31520421     DOI: 10.1111/anae.14838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  4 in total

1.  Indications for prehospital intubation among severely injured children and the prevalence of significant traumatic brain injury among those intubated due to impaired level of consciousness.

Authors:  Nir Samuel; Yoav Hoffmann; Stav Rakedzon; Ari M Lipsky; Aeyal Raz; Hen Ben Lulu; Hany Bahouth; Danny Epstein
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Early Neurologic Recovery, Practice Pattern Variation, and the Risk of Endotracheal Intubation Following Established Status Epilepticus.

Authors:  Eric S Rosenthal; Jordan J Elm; James Ingles; Alexander J Rogers; Thomas E Terndrup; Maija Holsti; Danny G Thomas; Lynn Babcock; Pamela J Okada; Robert H Lipsky; Joseph B Miller; Robert W Hickey; Megan E Barra; Thomas P Bleck; James C Cloyd; Robert Silbergleit; Daniel H Lowenstein; Lisa D Coles; Jaideep Kapur; Shlomo Shinnar; James M Chamberlain
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Controversies and evidence gaps in the early management of severe traumatic brain injury: back to the ABCs.

Authors:  Seif Tarek El-Swaify; Mazen A Refaat; Sara H Ali; Abdelrahman E Mostafa Abdelrazek; Pavly Wagih Beshay; Menna Kamel; Bassem Bahaa; Abdelrahman Amir; Ahmed Kamel Basha
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2022-01-05

4.  Clinical variation in the organization of clinical pathways in esophagogastric cancer, a mixed method multiple case study.

Authors:  P A J Vissers; R H A Verhoeven; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; M J Westerman; J C H B M Luijten; L Brom; M de Bièvre; J Buijsen; T Rozema; N Haj Mohammad; P van Duijvendijk; E A Kouwenhoven; W J Eshuis; C Rosman; P D Siersema; H W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.908

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.