| Literature DB >> 31520332 |
Alex Frid1, Meirav Shor2, Alla Shifrin3,2, David Yarnitsky3,2, Yelena Granovsky3,2.
Abstract
Advanced analyses of electroencephalography (EEG) are rapidly becoming an important tool in understanding the brain's processing of pain. To date, it appears that none have been explored as a way of distinguishing between migraine patients with aura (MWA) vs. those without aura (MWoA). In this work, we apply a mixture of predictive, e.g., classification methods and attribute-selection techniques, and traditional explanatory, e.g., statistical, analyses on functional connectivity measures extracted from EEG signal acquired from at-rest participants (N = 52) during their interictal period and tested them against the distinction between MWA and MWoA. We show that a functional connectivity metric of EEG data obtained during resting state can serve as a sole biomarker to differentiate between MWA and MWoA. Using the proposed analysis, we not only have been able to present high classification results (average classification of 84.62%) but also to discuss the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms upon which our technique is based. Additionally, a more traditional statistical analysis on the selected features reveals that MWoA patients show higher than average connectivity in the Theta band (p = 0.03) at rest than MWAs. We propose that our data-driven analysis pipeline can be used for resting-EEG analysis in any clinical context.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; EEG classification; EEG functional connectivity analysis; Explanatory machine learning; Migraine classification; Resting state EEG
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31520332 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-019-02357-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Biomed Eng ISSN: 0090-6964 Impact factor: 3.934