Literature DB >> 31520213

Complications After Extended Radical Resections for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Pelvic Malignancies: A 25-Year Experience.

Oliver Peacock1, Peadar S Waters2, Joseph C Kong2, Satish K Warrier2, Chris Wakeman3, Tim Eglinton3, Alexander G Heriot2, Frank A Frizelle3, Jacob J McCormick2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The oncological role of pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancies arising from the anorectum, gynaecological, or urological systems is now well-established. Despite this, the surgical community has been slow to accept pelvic exenteration, undoubtedly due to concerns about high morbidity and mortality rates. This study assessed the general major complications and predictors of morbidity following extended radical resections for locally advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancies.
METHODS: Data were collected from prospective databases at two high-volume institutions specialising in beyond TME surgery for locally advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancies between 1990 and 2015. The primary outcome measures were major complications (Clavien-Dindo 3 or above) and predictors for morbidity.
RESULTS: A total of 646 consecutive patients required extended surgery for local advanced pelvic malignancies. The median age was 63 (range 19-89) years, and the majority were female (371; 57.4%). One or more major complications were observed in 106 patients (16.4%). The most common major complications were intra-abdominal collection (43.7%; n = 59/135) and wound infection (14.1%; n = 19/135). The overall inpatient mortality rate was 0.46% (n = 3/646). Independent predictors for major morbidity following surgery for locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies were squamous cell carcinoma of anus, sacrectomy, and blood transfusion requirement.
CONCLUSIONS: This series adds increasing evidence that good outcomes can be achieved for extended radical resections in locally advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancies. A coordinated approach in specialist centres for beyond TME surgery demonstrates that this is a safe and feasible procedure, offering low major complication rates.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31520213     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07816-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  5 in total

1.  Postoperative pain management after concomitant sacrectomy for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kitakaze; Mamoru Uemura; Yuta Kobayashi; Masakatsu Paku; Masaaki Miyo; Yusuke Takahashi; Masakazu Miyake; Takeshi Kato; Masataka Ikeda; Shiki Fujino; Takayuki Ogino; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Hidekazu Takahashi; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Yuichiro Doki; Hidetoshi Eguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Novel technique with bladder peritoneum to prevent empty pelvic syndrome after laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: Three case reports.

Authors:  Yiran Wang; Ping Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Suicide and Accidental Death Among Women With Primary Ovarian Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Kaixu Yu; Jiaqiang Xiong; Jinjin Zhang; Su Zhou; Jun Dai; Meng Wu; Shixuan Wang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-16

4.  Using Bakri balloon as a visceral replacement for occupying pelvic cavity in pelvic exenteration, a case report.

Authors:  Soheila Aminimoghaddam; Nafisseh Hivehchi; Marjan Ghaemi; Arefeh Eshghinejad; Maryam Yazdizadeh
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-09-13

Review 5.  Urinary diversion after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Carlos Martínez-Gómez; Martina Aida Angeles; Alejandra Martinez; Bernard Malavaud; Gwenael Ferron
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.437

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.