Literature DB >> 31520175

The efficacy and toxicity of 4-day chemotherapy with methotrexate, etoposide and actinomycin D in patients with choriocarcinoma and high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Shizuka Sato1, Eiko Yamamoto2,3, Kaoru Niimi1, Kazuhiko Ino4, Kimihiro Nishino1, Shiro Suzuki1, Tomomi Kotani1, Hiroaki Kajiyama1, Fumitaka Kikkawa1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of 4-day chemotherapy with methotrexate, etoposide, and actinomycin D (MEA) for patients who were diagnosed with choriocarcinoma and high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).
METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2015, 29 patients were treated with 4-day MEA after being diagnosed with choriocarcinoma or high-risk GTN. Complete remission to 4-day MEA and adverse effects were retrospectively evaluated.
RESULTS: The complete remission rates were 79.3% (23/29) and 87.5% (21/24) in all patients and in those who received 4-day MEA as first-line therapy, respectively. Of six patients who developed drug resistance to 4-day MEA, three patients showed complete remission by other treatments, while the other three patients died of the disease. The major adverse effects were leukocytopenia, anemia, and nausea. Of 23 patients who were cured with 4-day MEA, treatment was changed to the etoposide and actinomycin D (EA) regimen in 14 patients, because of leukocytopenia, hepatotoxicity, and stomatitis. Among 20 patients who required hormonal therapy, 15 patients showed normal menstrual cycles after therapy. Five patients had nine conceptions (seven term live births and two spontaneous abortions). No babies were premature or had low birth weight nor did they have congenital anomalies.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the efficacy and the adverse effects of 4-day MEA for choriocarcinoma and high-risk GTN may be the same level as EMA/CO. However, further study will be needed for determining the criteria of changing the treatment regimen from 4-day MEA to the EA regimen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actinomycin D; Choriocarcinoma; Etoposide; High-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; Methotrexate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31520175     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01540-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  24 in total

1.  FIGO staging for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia 2000. FIGO Oncology Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Results with EMA/CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, vincristine) chemotherapy in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  T Turan; O Karacay; G Tulunay; N Boran; S Koc; S Bozok; M F Kose
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors: results from a cohort of 272 patients.

Authors:  M Bower; E S Newlands; L Holden; D Short; C Brock; G J Rustin; R H Begent; K D Bagshawe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for choriocarcinoma: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Eiko Yamamoto; Kaoru Niimi; Kayo Fujikake; Tetsuya Nishida; Makoto Murata; Ayako Mitsuma; Yuichi Ando; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-08

5.  The management of gestational trophoblastic tumors with etoposide, methotrexate, and actinomycin D.

Authors:  V Soto-Wright; D P Goldstein; M R Bernstein; R S Berkowitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  EMA-CO chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a clinical analysis of 54 patients.

Authors:  W-G Lu; F Ye; Y-M Shen; Y-F Fu; H-Z Chen; X-Y Wan; X Xie
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  Alternating weekly chemotherapy with etoposide-methotrexate-dactinomycin/cyclophosphamide-vincristine for high-risk gestational trophoblastic disease.

Authors:  J T Soper; A C Evans; D L Clarke-Pearson; A Berchuck; G Rodriguez; C B Hammond
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Results with the EMA/CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, vincristine) regimen in high risk gestational trophoblastic tumours, 1979 to 1989.

Authors:  E S Newlands; K D Bagshawe; R H Begent; G J Rustin; L Holden
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-06

9.  Selecting an appropriate hCG test for managing gestational trophoblastic disease and cancer.

Authors:  Laurence A Cole; Jaime M Sutton
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  Pregnancy after EMA/CO for gestational trophoblastic disease: a report from The Netherlands.

Authors:  C A R Lok; C van der Houwen; M J ten Kate-Booij; M A van Eijkeren; A C Ansink
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  4 in total

1.  Giving Drugs a Second Chance: Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effects of Ciclopirox and Ribavirin against Cystic Fibrosis Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Bonaventura; Veronica Lupetti; Simone De Fabritiis; Alessandra Piccirilli; Annamaria Porreca; Marta Di Nicola; Arianna Pompilio
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  Treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease in the 2020s.

Authors:  James J Clark; Susanna Slater; Michael J Seckl
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.211

3.  Core 2 β1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases accelerate the escape of choriocarcinoma from natural killer cell immunity.

Authors:  Kenichi Nakamura; Kaoru Niimi; Eiko Yamamoto; Yoshiki Ikeda; Kimihiro Nishino; Shiro Suzuki; Hiroaki Kajiyama; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2021-02-13

4.  Clinical assessment of prophylactic chemotherapy in treating with hydatidiform mole: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Yan-Li Zheng; Xiao-Yan Lu; Hai-Feng Qiao; Ying Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.