Literature DB >> 31520158

The impact of polyethylene abrasion on the occurrence of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures in patients with total hip arthroplasty.

Dirk Zajonz1,2, Nora Lang1, Cathleen Pönick1, Melanie Edel1,2, Robert Möbius1,2, Harald Busse3, Christoph Josten1,2, Andreas Roth1,2, Johannes K M Fakler4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In addition to abrasion-induced osteolysis and ensuing instabilities, the polyethylene (PE) abrasion of total hip arthroplasty (THA) inlays can also cause gait instability due to the decentralization of the hip joint. The current literature yields, as yet, insufficient findings whether these two factors are linked directly or indirectly to a higher risk for periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures (PPFF). The aim of our retrospective evaluation is to analyse the impact of PE abrasion on the pathology of PPFF in patients with THA.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective evaluation comprises all PPFF in patients with THA in the period from 01/2010 up to 12/2016. The study group (SG) included 66 cases (n = 66). The control group (CG) was comprised of patients with asymptomatic THA (n = 66), who were treated by our outpatient department including routine check-ups and X-ray examinations. We used the matched-pair methodology to scale the period of postsurgical care of the CG to the lifetime of the implant up to PPFF in the SG. We included epidemiologic data, radiological femoral head decentralization, osteolysis (Gruen classification), instabilities, acetabular cup position, and implant properties in our analysis. For the SG, we also included intra-operative signs of abrasion.
FINDINGS: The SG showed significantly higher numbers of decentralized THA as signs of inlay erosion with 73% compared to only 41% in the CG (p > 0.001). The SG showed 1 ± 0.68 mm hip joint decentralization as to 0.5 ± 0.59 mm in the CG (p = 0.004). We found significantly more cases of osteolysis in the SG (n = 25) than in the CG (n = 13) (p = 0.003). We found no notable differences in acetabular cup inclination or anteversion as well as cup size. However, differences were significant in femoral head size (SG 32 ± 2.3 mm, CG 36 ± 2.4 mm; p = 0.042) and head material. We found more widespread use of metal femoral heads in the SG than in the CG (SG 1:1, CG 1:21; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: PPFF patients showed significantly higher rates of inlay erosion, resulting in femoral head decentralization and osteolysis. The higher rate of fracture is likely caused by the increasing instability of the implant fixation due to abrasion-induced osteolysis and the associated degradation of bone quality. It is conceivable that the abrasion and decentralization of the THA can also lead to gait instability, and thus, a higher proneness to falls. Gait instability can also be aggravated by increased granulation tissue and effusion due to the inlay abrasion. Although this cannot be substantiated by the investigation. In patients with decentralization of the THA and osteolysis, a radiological follow-up should be performed, and in case of gait instability (femoral head and) inlay replacements should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures; Polyethylene abrasion; THA; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31520158     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01222-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  18 in total

1.  Particle disease osteolysis of the pelvis and the hip after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John T Maltese; Myron M Laban; Krishnaj Gorab; John C Maltese
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 2.  [Diagnosis and therapy of particle disease in total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Müller; G Wassilew; C Perka
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 0.923

3.  In-vivo elongation of anterior and posterior cruciate ligament in bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Ming H L Liow; Yun Peng; Paul Arauz; Guoan Li; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Prediction of Polyethylene Wear Rates from Gait Biomechanics and Implant Positioning in Total Hip Replacement.

Authors:  Marzieh M Ardestani; Pedro P Amenábar Edwards; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Heather A Gawel; Jasmine D Patel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 7.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur.

Authors:  Michael Cross; Mathias Bostrom
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 8.  Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Authors:  John Franklin; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 9.  Femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Neil P Sheth; Charles L Nelson; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Polyethylene wear and osteolysis is associated with high revision rate of a small sized porous coated THA in patients with hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Patrick J Murray; Katherine L Hwang; Susanna N Imrie; James I Huddleston; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.