Literature DB >> 31520152

Multicenter prospective study validating the efficacy of a quantitative assessment tool for frailty in patients with urological cancers.

Osamu Soma1, Shingo Hatakeyama2, Teppei Okamoto1, Naoki Fujita1, Itsuto Hamano1, Toshikazu Tanaka1, Masaki Momota1, Tohru Yoneyama3, Hayato Yamamoto1, Atsushi Imai1, Takahiro Yoneyama1, Yasuhiro Hashimoto1, Kazuaki Yoshikawa4, Toshiaki Kawaguchi5, Hisao Saitoh6, Shigeyuki Nakaji7, Tadashi Suzuki6, Chikara Ohyama1,3.   

Abstract

We prospectively validate the efficacy of the frailty discriminant score (FDS) in individuals with urological cancers, as there has been growing importance in evaluating frailty in clinical practice. A prospective, multicenter study was conducted from February 2017 to April 2019. We enrolled 258 patients with urological cancers and 301 community-dwelling participants who were assessed for frailty. Frailty was assessed using FDS that includes ten items, such as physical, mental, and blood biochemical tests. The primary outcome was the non-inferiority (margin 5%) of FDS in discriminating patients with urological cancers from controls (Ctrl). The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for each predictive test were calculated. The secondary endpoints included the prediction of overall survival between patients with urological cancer who have high and low FDS. FDS was significantly higher in patients with urological cancers than that in the Ctrl. The AUROC curves for individuals with non-prostate cancers (such as bladder cancer, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma; 0.942) and those with prostate cancer (0.943) were within the non-inferior margin. The overall survival values were significantly lower in patients with higher FDS score than in those with lower FDS score. The study met its primary and secondary endpoints. The FDS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing frailty and prognosis in patients with urological cancers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frailty; Frailty discriminant score; Prostate cancer; Renal cell carcinoma; Urological cancer; Urothelial carcinoma

Year:  2019        PMID: 31520152     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-019-1313-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  3 in total

1.  Association between the baseline frailty and quality of life in patients with prostate cancer (FRAQ-PC study).

Authors:  Tomoko Hamaya; Shingo Hatakeyama; Masaki Momota; Takuma Narita; Hiromichi Iwamura; Yuta Kojima; Itsuto Hamano; Naoki Fujita; Teppei Okamoto; Kyo Togashi; Tohru Yoneyama; Hayato Yamamoto; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Relationship of frailty with treatment modality selection in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (FRART-BC study).

Authors:  Hiromichi Iwamura; Shingo Hatakeyama; Masaki Momota; Yuta Kojima; Takuma Narita; Teppei Okamoto; Naoki Fujita; Itsuto Hamano; Kyou Togashi; Tomoko Hamaya; Tohru Yoneyama; Hayato Yamamoto; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-03

3.  Frailty is a predictor of moderate to severe pain after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A case-control study (FRAP study).

Authors:  Masaki Momota; Shingo Hatakeyama; Osamu Soma; Itsuto Hamano; Naoki Fujita; Teppei Okamoto; Kyo Togashi; Tomoko Hamaya; Tohru Yoneyama; Hayato Yamamoto; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-05-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.