Literature DB >> 31520116

[Outcome of pterygium excision after various surgical techniques-is excision with simple conjunctival closure still lege artis?]

K Eisenmann1, F Zeman2, H Helbig1, M-A Gamulescu1, T Barth3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus about the best method for pterygium excision. Variable recurrence rates have been reported in the literature depending on the surgical technique.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the postoperative outcome after pterygium excision depending on the preoperative extent of the pterygium and the surgical method.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 109 patients (72 men, 37 women) who underwent 109 pterygium surgeries were retrospectively analyzed. In 87 cases postoperative data over a 5-year follow-up period were available. Besides recording the preoperative extent of the pterygium the functional outcome was analyzed and recurrence rates of the various techniques by simple excision with primary conjunctival closure (SE), conjunctival autograft (BHT) and amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) were compared.
RESULTS: Overall, recurrence was noted in 21 %. The recurrence rate of SE was 20 %. After BHT fewer recurrences (11 %) were seen than after AMT (39 %). After the intraoperative use of mitomycin C (MMC) more recurrences (31 %) occurred than without the use of MMC (17%). In 45 % of the cases delayed recurrence occurred after the first postoperative year.
CONCLUSION: In our opinion the method of SE is not obsolete. Good results can be achieved with SE in pterygia with a small extent. The lowest recurrence rate was seen after BHT; therefore, BHT is the method of choice in general and especially for larger pterygia. The higher recurrence rate after intraoperative use of MMC is probably caused by selection bias. Regular follow-up examinations are required beyond the first postoperative year for timely detection of delayed recurrence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amniotic membrane transplantation; Conjunctival autograft; Conjunctival surgery; Pterygium; Pterygium surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31520116     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-019-00968-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  27 in total

1.  Intraoperative mitomycin in primary pterygium excision. A prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  C A Manning; P M Kloess; M D Diaz; R W Yee
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 2.  Conjunctival Autograft Versus Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for Treatment of Pterygium: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Clearfield; Barbara S Hawkins; Irene C Kuo
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pterygium Surgery: An Image Analysis Study.

Authors:  Sang Beom Han; Hyun Sun Jeon; Moosang Kim; Seung-Jun Lee; Hee Kyung Yang; Jeong-Min Hwang; Kwang Gi Kim; Joon Young Hyon; Won Ryang Wee
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  A randomized trial of conjunctival autografting for pterygium in the tropics.

Authors:  S Lewallen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 5.  Modulation of Fibroblasts in Conjunctival Wound Healing.

Authors:  Mark Zada; Ushasree Pattamatta; Andrew White
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Pterygium recurrence time.

Authors:  L W Hirst; A Sebban; D Chant
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Early and late effects of pterygium surgery on corneal topography.

Authors:  Murat Ozdemir; Adnan Cinal
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

8.  Ten-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing 0.02% mitomycin C and limbal conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery.

Authors:  Alvin L Young; Mary Ho; Vishal Jhanji; Lulu Lu Cheng
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Serious complications of topical mitomycin-C after pterygium surgery.

Authors:  R S Rubinfeld; R R Pfister; R M Stein; C S Foster; N F Martin; S Stoleru; A R Talley; M G Speaker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  A randomized trial comparing mitomycin C and conjunctival autograft after excision of primary pterygium.

Authors:  P P Chen; R G Ariyasu; V Kaza; L D LaBree; P J McDonnell
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Should mitomycin C be used routinely in pterygium surgery?]

Authors:  K Eisenmann; F Zeman; H Helbig; M-A Gamulescu; T Barth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [The use of mitomycin C in pterygium surgery].

Authors:  Thiago Gonçalves Dos Santos Martins; Thomaz Goncalves Dos Santos Martins; Andreas Anschütz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Pterygium: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment].

Authors:  Alexander C Rokohl; Ludwig M Heindl; Claus Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Amniotic Membrane Transplantation Combined with Closure of Tenon Capsule and Bulbar Conjunctival Space in the Treatment of Primary Pterygium.

Authors:  Jingyao Chen; Yixin Zheng; Weijia Zhang; Zijun Zhao; Yanze Xu
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.009

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.