Literature DB >> 31519280

Differences in demographics and complementary and alternative medicine use between patients attending integrative kampo versus biomedical clinics in Japan.

Melissa K Melby1, Tetsuhiro Yoshino2, Dunia Tonob3, Yuko Horiba2, Kenji Watanabe2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Growing interest in integrative medicine motivates examination of who seeks integrative care, and why. By examining differences in demographics and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use between patients recruited from Japanese Kampo (traditional herbal medicine) versus biomedical clinics, this study aimed to identify whether integrative medicine options might attract different patients. DESIGN AND
SETTING: In this cross-sectional, observational study we administered the International Complementary and Alternative Medicine-Questionnaire (I-CAM-Q) to 209 patients recruited from four hospital clinics. Demographics, use of different types of CAM (self-help CAM, CAM practitioners, CAM products), and motivations were compared between Kampo and Non-Kampo patients and by gender. Factors influencing attendance at the Kampo clinic and CAM use were identified using logistic regression.
RESULTS: While some demographic characteristics, CAM provider and total CAM use differed between Kampo and non-Kampo patients, self-help CAM use did not. Motivations (for acute, long-term, health maintenance, or other reasons) differed between Kampo and non-Kampo clinic patients for going to non-Kampo physicians (P = 0.02) and Kampo physicians (P = 0.1). Logistic regression results for 'any CAM' use showed odds ratio of 0.32 (95%CI 0.15-0.67) for self-rated health, and 1.60 (95%CI 1.10-2.32) for Macarthur subjective social status scale. Attendance at the Kampo clinic showed odds ratios of 1.50 (95%CI 1.11-2.02) for education and 0.56 (95%CI 0.39-0.80) for employment status.
CONCLUSIONS: Better understanding of factors such as motivation, self-rated health, and socioeconomic conditions that influence patients' CAM use and integrative clinic attendance may enable more effective targeting of populations and integration of CAM into biomedical settings.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complementary and alternative medicine; Healthcare access; Integrative medicine; Kampo; Patient-centered care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31519280     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  4 in total

1.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Norway: a cross-sectional survey with a modified Norwegian version of the international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-QN).

Authors:  Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen; Sara A Quandt; Trine Stub
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2021-03-16

2.  Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use by Patients From the Gulf Region Seen in the International Practice of a Tertiary Care Medical Center.

Authors:  Esayas B Kebede; Judy Tan; Salma Iftikhar; Haitham S Abu Lebdeh; Murali K Duggirala; Amit K Ghosh; Ivana T Croghan; Sarah M Jenkins; Saswati Mahapatra; Brent A Bauer; Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2021-04-21

3.  Traditional East Asian herbal medicines for the treatment of poststroke constipation: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Chul Jin; Bo-Hyoung Jang; Jin Pyeong Jeon; Ye-Seul Lee; Seung-Bo Yang; Seungwon Kwon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Complementary and alternative medicines chosen for specific health problems: Internet survey using the I-CAM-Q in Japan: A STROBE-compliant cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ryo Tabata; Harutaka Yamaguchi; Yoshihiro Ookura; Kenji Tani
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.