Literature DB >> 31519090

Disaggregating the Universal Coverage Cube: Putting Equity in the Picture.

Marc J Roberts1,2, William C Hsiao1,2, Michael R Reich1.   

Abstract

Abstract-In recent years, the World Health Organization's "Cube Diagram" has been widely used to illustrate the policy options in moving toward Universal Health Coverage. The Cube has become a globally recognized visual representation of health system reform choices, with its axes defined by: (1) the services covered by pooled funds, (2) the population covered, and (3) the proportion of costs covered. The Cube shows the difference between the current national coverage situation in a country and the policy goal of universal health coverage, identifying where major gaps exist. The essential feature of the Cube diagram is that it shows a country's coverage situation in terms of national averages. As a result, it does not present or call attention to significant disparities in coverage across population groups, which are characteristic of most low- and middle-income countries. This article recommends adding a new diagram that disaggregates the Cube. The new diagram, called the Step Pyramid, allows a policy maker to visualize specific choices in expanding the coverage status of different population groups. This new diagram can help policy makers focus explicitly on equity concerns as they set priorities in moving toward universal health coverage. The paper explains how to construct a Step Pyramid diagram, provides a hypothetical illustration, and then uses data from Mexico to create an example of a Step Pyramid diagram. The paper concludes with a discussion of the strengths, limits, and implications of both the Cube and the Step Pyramid.

Keywords:  Universal Health Coverage; WHO UC Cube; equity; health system reform

Year:  2015        PMID: 31519090     DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2014.995981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Syst Reform        ISSN: 2328-8620


  5 in total

1.  Balancing health and financial protection in health benefit package design.

Authors:  Katherine T Lofgren; David A Watkins; Solomon T Memirie; Joshua A Salomon; Stéphane Verguet
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Using an equity-based framework for evaluating publicly funded health insurance programmes as an instrument of UHC in Chhattisgarh State, India.

Authors:  Sulakshana Nandi; Helen Schneider
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-05-25

3.  How is equity approached in universal health coverage? An analysis of global and country policy documents in Benin and Senegal.

Authors:  Elisabeth Paul; Céline Deville; Oriane Bodson; N'koué Emmanuel Sambiéni; Ibrahima Thiam; Marc Bourgeois; Valéry Ridde; Fabienne Fecher
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-12-17

4.  Inequity in the Access to eHealth and Its Decomposition Case of Poland.

Authors:  Justyna Rój
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Access to skilled attendant at birth and the coverage of the third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine across 14 West African countries - an equity analysis.

Authors:  Jacob Albin Korem Alhassan; Oghenebrume Wariri; Egwu Onuwabuchi; Godwin Mark; Yakubu Kwarshak; Eseoghene Dase
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2020-06-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.