Literature DB >> 31519081

Participation of the Lay Public in Decision-Making for Benefit Coverage of National Health Insurance in South Korea.

Juhwan Oh1, Young Ko2, Allison Baer Alley3, Soonman Kwon4.   

Abstract

Abstract-Although South Korea successfully established national health insurance (NHI) in 1977, and has maintained universal coverage since 1989, it has long been criticized for insufficient benefit coverage. Korea has been under public pressure to increase its NHI benefit coverage, while also facing controversies over the appropriateness of items that were newly added to the benefit package. Pressured by the controversies and difficulties regarding national policy decisions on the benefits package, the Korea National Health Insurance Services eventually decided to establish a lay citizen's council, named the Citizen Committee for Participation, to help incorporate social value judgments in benefit coverage priority setting in 2012. The experience of the citizen council in Korea shows that unlike common myth, people may be willing to increase their premium contribution to expand benefits once a deliberative, democratic decision-making process exists. The general public does not necessarily demand ever-increasing benefits; rather they wish to keep benefits at a reasonable level once they understand the nature of public funding, financial sustainability, and cost effectiveness. If these experiences are common among all people in the world, not only in the unique context of Korea, this public participation approach to deliberative democracy may help reduce policy failure in other cultural settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accountability for reasonableness; benefit package; health insurance; priority setting; public participation; setting limit

Year:  2015        PMID: 31519081     DOI: 10.4161/23288604.2014.991218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Syst Reform        ISSN: 2328-8620


  5 in total

1.  Ethical Consideration of National Health Insurance Reform for Universal Health Coverage in the Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Yuri Lee; Siwoo Kim; So Yoon Kim; Ganglip Kim
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2019-03-29

2.  Justice and public participation in universal health coverage: when is tiered coverage unfair and who should decide?

Authors:  Bridget Pratt
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2018-11-06

Review 3.  Essential medicines for universal health coverage.

Authors:  Veronika J Wirtz; Hans V Hogerzeil; Andrew L Gray; Maryam Bigdeli; Cornelis P de Joncheere; Margaret A Ewen; Martha Gyansa-Lutterodt; Sun Jing; Vera L Luiza; Regina M Mbindyo; Helene Möller; Corrina Moucheraud; Bernard Pécoul; Lembit Rägo; Arash Rashidian; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Peter N Stephens; Yot Teerawattananon; Ellen F M 't Hoen; Anita K Wagner; Prashant Yadav; Michael R Reich
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Legislating for public accountability in universal health coverage, Thailand.

Authors:  Kanang Kantamaturapoj; Anond Kulthanmanusorn; Woranan Witthayapipopsakul; Shaheda Viriyathorn; Walaiporn Patcharanarumol; Churnrurtai Kanchanachitra; Suwit Wibulpolprasert; Viroj Tangcharoensathien
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Public Preferences in Resource Allocation for Insurance Coverage of Dental Implant Service in South Korea: Citizens' Jury.

Authors:  Hwa-Young Lee; Eun-Young Bae; Kyungdo Lee; Minah Kang; Juhwan Oh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.