Krishnan Ravindran1, John C Wellons2, Michael C Dewan2. 1. 1Melbourne Medical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and. 2. 2Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The optimal revascularization for pediatric moyamoya for reducing the incidence of future stroke events remains to be determined. METHODS: The authors conducted a search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science electronic databases from inception until January 2019. The primary endpoint was the presence of a future ischemic stroke event. Secondary endpoints were angiographic outcomes as measured by postoperative Matsushima grade and clinical symptom persistence. Patients who underwent either direct or combined direct/indirect revascularization were classified into the direct cohort. Data from each study on presence of postoperative stroke events were used to generate standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, which were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of standardized mean differences in a random effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis, comprising 2258 patients (1011 males, mean age 8.3 ± 1.8 years) who were followed up clinically for an average of 71.4 ± 51.3 months. One hundred fifty-four patients underwent direct bypass alone, 680 patients underwent either direct or combined direct/indirect revascularization procedures, while 1424 patients underwent indirect bypass alone. The frequencies of future stroke events in patients undergoing direct bypass alone, combined bypass, or indirect bypass alone were 1 per 190.3 patient-years, 1 per 108.9 patient-years, and 1 per 61.1 patient-years, respectively, in each cohort. The estimated stroke rates were 9.0% with indirect revascularization, 4.5% with direct revascularization alone, and 6.0% with combined revascularization. A forest plot did not reveal any significant differences in the incidence of future stroke events or angiographic outcomes following direct-only, combined, or indirect-only revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Direct, indirect, and combined indirect/direct bypass techniques are all effective revascularization options for pediatric moyamoya disease. A relative paucity of granular studies-and inherent surgical selection bias-limits direct comparison between interventions. Suitably designed prospective cohort studies may be useful in identifying patients likely to receive benefit from specific procedures.
OBJECTIVE: The optimal revascularization for pediatric moyamoya for reducing the incidence of future stroke events remains to be determined. METHODS: The authors conducted a search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science electronic databases from inception until January 2019. The primary endpoint was the presence of a future ischemic stroke event. Secondary endpoints were angiographic outcomes as measured by postoperative Matsushima grade and clinical symptom persistence. Patients who underwent either direct or combined direct/indirect revascularization were classified into the direct cohort. Data from each study on presence of postoperative stroke events were used to generate standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, which were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of standardized mean differences in a random effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis, comprising 2258 patients (1011 males, mean age 8.3 ± 1.8 years) who were followed up clinically for an average of 71.4 ± 51.3 months. One hundred fifty-four patients underwent direct bypass alone, 680 patients underwent either direct or combined direct/indirect revascularization procedures, while 1424 patients underwent indirect bypass alone. The frequencies of future stroke events in patients undergoing direct bypass alone, combined bypass, or indirect bypass alone were 1 per 190.3 patient-years, 1 per 108.9 patient-years, and 1 per 61.1 patient-years, respectively, in each cohort. The estimated stroke rates were 9.0% with indirect revascularization, 4.5% with direct revascularization alone, and 6.0% with combined revascularization. A forest plot did not reveal any significant differences in the incidence of future stroke events or angiographic outcomes following direct-only, combined, or indirect-only revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Direct, indirect, and combined indirect/direct bypass techniques are all effective revascularization options for pediatric moyamoya disease. A relative paucity of granular studies-and inherent surgical selection bias-limits direct comparison between interventions. Suitably designed prospective cohort studies may be useful in identifying patients likely to receive benefit from specific procedures.
Entities:
Keywords:
CI = confidence interval; EDAMS = encephaloduroarteriomyosynangiosis; EDAS = encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis; EGS = encephalogaleosynangiosis; EMS = encephalomyosynangiosis; ES = effect size; MCA = middle cerebral artery; OR = odds ratio; PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; RR = relative risk; STA = superficial temporal artery; TIA = transient ischemic attack; direct bypass; encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis; indirect bypass; revascularization; vascular disorders
Authors: Zeferino Demartini; Bernardo Ca Teixeira; Gelson Luis Koppe; Luana A Maranha Gatto; Alex Roman; Renato Puppi Munhoz Journal: Radiol Bras Date: 2022 Jan-Feb