Justine L Newman1, James R Stone2. 1. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. 2. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. Electronic address: jrstone@partners.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has emerged as a promising new approach to treat malignancy. Such therapies can result in autoimmune-related complications such as myocarditis and hepatitis. The impact of ICI on sites of preexisting chronic inflammation has been less clear. Atherosclerosis is a chronic vascular disease with a significant inflammatory component. METHODS: To determine the effect of ICI on the inflammatory infiltrate in coronary artery atherosclerotic plaques, 11 patients who had recently been treated with ICI and subsequently underwent autopsy were matched with 11 cancer patients who had not received ICI treatment. The amount of CD3+ T-lymphocytes, CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, and CD68+ macrophages and the ratios of the various cell types in the coronary artery atherosclerotic plaques were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the absolute numbers of CD3+, CD8+, or CD68+ cells in the atherosclerotic plaques. In the plaques of the ICI-treated patients, there was a significant increase in the ratio of CD3+ cells to CD68+ cells (CD3/CD68) (P=.002) and a trend towards an increased CD8/CD68 ratio. The increased CD3/CD68 ratio in the ICI-treated patients resulted in 6 of the 11 patients having lymphocyte-predominate inflammation in contrast to the macrophage-predominate inflammation typically found in atherosclerotic plaques. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that ICI alters the inflammatory composition of human atherosclerotic plaque and, thus, may influence plaque progression and/or clinical coronary events. SUMMARY: In cancer patients, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition is associated with an altered inflammatory cell composition in coronary artery atherosclerotic plaques with an increased ratio of CD3+ T cells to CD68+ macrophages. Thus, immune checkpoint inhibition may influence plaque progression and/or clinical coronary events.
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has emerged as a promising new approach to treat malignancy. Such therapies can result in autoimmune-related complications such as myocarditis and hepatitis. The impact of ICI on sites of preexisting chronic inflammation has been less clear. Atherosclerosis is a chronic vascular disease with a significant inflammatory component. METHODS: To determine the effect of ICI on the inflammatory infiltrate in coronary artery atherosclerotic plaques, 11 patients who had recently been treated with ICI and subsequently underwent autopsy were matched with 11 cancerpatients who had not received ICI treatment. The amount of CD3+ T-lymphocytes, CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, and CD68+ macrophages and the ratios of the various cell types in the coronary artery atherosclerotic plaques were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the absolute numbers of CD3+, CD8+, or CD68+ cells in the atherosclerotic plaques. In the plaques of the ICI-treated patients, there was a significant increase in the ratio of CD3+ cells to CD68+ cells (CD3/CD68) (P=.002) and a trend towards an increased CD8/CD68 ratio. The increased CD3/CD68 ratio in the ICI-treated patients resulted in 6 of the 11 patients having lymphocyte-predominate inflammation in contrast to the macrophage-predominate inflammation typically found in atherosclerotic plaques. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that ICI alters the inflammatory composition of humanatherosclerotic plaque and, thus, may influence plaque progression and/or clinical coronary events. SUMMARY: In cancerpatients, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition is associated with an altered inflammatory cell composition in coronary artery atherosclerotic plaques with an increased ratio of CD3+ T cells to CD68+ macrophages. Thus, immune checkpoint inhibition may influence plaque progression and/or clinical coronary events.
Authors: Jacqueline T Vuong; Ashley F Stein-Merlob; Arash Nayeri; Tamer Sallam; Tomas G Neilan; Eric H Yang Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Kikkie Poels; Mandy M T van Leent; Myrthe E Reiche; Pascal J H Kusters; Stephan Huveneers; Menno P J de Winther; Willem J M Mulder; Esther Lutgens; Tom T P Seijkens Journal: Cells Date: 2020-08-29 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Kikkie Poels; Suzanne I M Neppelenbroek; Marie José Kersten; M Louisa Antoni; Esther Lutgens; Tom T P Seijkens Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 13.751