Literature DB >> 31518859

Time series classification using a modified LSTM approach from accelerometer-based data: A comparative study for gait cycle detection.

Hui Xing Tan1, Nway Nway Aung1, Jing Tian1, Matthew Chin Heng Chua2, Youheng Ou Yang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gait event detection (GED) is an important aspect in identifying and interpret a user's gait to assess gait abnormalities and design intelligent assistive devices. RESEARCH QUESTION: There is a need to develop robust GED models that can accurately detect various gait instances in different scenarios and environments.
METHODS: This paper presents a novel method of detecting heel strikes (HS) and toe offs (TO) during the user's gait cycle using a modified Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks approach. The method was tested on a database from Movement Analysis in Real-world Environments using Accelerometers (MAREA) (n = 20 healthy subjects) that consisted of walking and running in indoor and outdoor environments with accelerometers positioned on waist, wrist and both ankles. Modifications include oversampling, composite accelerations and optimizing the LSTM network architecture were made.
RESULTS: Performance of our modified model was found to be better than six state-of-the-art GED algorithms, with a median F1 score of 0.98 for Heel Strikes and 0.98 for Toe Offs in the scenario of steady walking in an indoor environment, and a median F1 score of 0.94 for Heel Strikes and 0.68 for Toe-offs in the scenario of walking and running in an outdoor environment. SIGNIFICANCE: This paper highlights the potential of the single proposed model to be an alternative to the six GED models in gait detection under various conditions.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait; Gait event detection; Inertial sensors; LSTM; Long-short term memory models

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31518859     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  7 in total

Review 1.  Fall Risk Assessment Using Wearable Sensors: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Rafael N Ferreira; Nuno Ferrete Ribeiro; Cristina P Santos
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

3.  Multimode optical fiber specklegram smart bed sensor array.

Authors:  Stephen C Warren-Smith; Adam D Kilpatrick; Kabish Wisal; Linh V Nguyen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.758

4.  Recent Machine Learning Progress in Lower Limb Running Biomechanics With Wearable Technology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Liangliang Xiang; Alan Wang; Yaodong Gu; Liang Zhao; Vickie Shim; Justin Fernandez
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.493

5.  Wearables and Deep Learning Classify Fall Risk From Gait in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Brett M Meyer; Lindsey J Tulipani; Reed D Gurchiek; Dakota A Allen; Lukas Adamowicz; Dale Larie; Andrew J Solomon; Nick Cheney; Ryan S McGinnis
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.772

6.  Does Site Matter? Impact of Inertial Measurement Unit Placement on the Validity and Reliability of Stride Variables During Running: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Horsley; Paul J Tofari; Shona L Halson; Justin G Kemp; Jessica Dickson; Nirav Maniar; Stuart J Cormack
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Gait Trajectory and Gait Phase Prediction Based on an LSTM Network.

Authors:  Binbin Su; Elena M Gutierrez-Farewik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.