Eun Ha Namkung1, Deborah Carr2. 1. Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, USA. Electronic address: enamkung@brandeis.edu. 2. Department of Sociology, Boston University, USA. Electronic address: carrds@bu.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: One-third of U.S. adults have an activity-limiting health condition and this proportion increases with age. However, it is unclear whether functional limitation renders one vulnerable to institutional and interpersonal discrimination, and whether this vulnerability differs over the life course. Stigma theories suggest disability would be more discrediting to younger persons relative to older adults, as it violates cultural norms and expectations regarding able-bodied working-age adults. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate whether U.S. adults with functional impairment report higher levels of perceived interpersonal mistreatment and institutional discrimination relative to persons without impairment, and whether these patterns differ across age groups. METHOD: We use data from the second wave of the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS II), collected between 2004 and 2006 (n = 3931). We estimate OLS and logistic regression models to predict interpersonal and institutional discrimination, respectively. RESULTS: Persons with impairment report more frequent encounters of disrespectful treatment, insults, and being treated as if they have a character flaw, and elevated odds of workplace- and service-related discrimination, net of sociodemographic, and physical and mental health characteristics. Effects are significantly larger among early (age 40-49) and late (age 50-64) midlife versus older (age 65+) adults. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss implications for policy and practice, and underscore that stigmatization processes may further amplify health and socioeconomic disparities between those with versus without functional limitations.
RATIONALE: One-third of U.S. adults have an activity-limiting health condition and this proportion increases with age. However, it is unclear whether functional limitation renders one vulnerable to institutional and interpersonal discrimination, and whether this vulnerability differs over the life course. Stigma theories suggest disability would be more discrediting to younger persons relative to older adults, as it violates cultural norms and expectations regarding able-bodied working-age adults. OBJECTIVE: We evaluate whether U.S. adults with functional impairment report higher levels of perceived interpersonal mistreatment and institutional discrimination relative to persons without impairment, and whether these patterns differ across age groups. METHOD: We use data from the second wave of the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS II), collected between 2004 and 2006 (n = 3931). We estimate OLS and logistic regression models to predict interpersonal and institutional discrimination, respectively. RESULTS:Persons with impairment report more frequent encounters of disrespectful treatment, insults, and being treated as if they have a character flaw, and elevated odds of workplace- and service-related discrimination, net of sociodemographic, and physical and mental health characteristics. Effects are significantly larger among early (age 40-49) and late (age 50-64) midlife versus older (age 65+) adults. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss implications for policy and practice, and underscore that stigmatization processes may further amplify health and socioeconomic disparities between those with versus without functional limitations.
Authors: Derald Wing Sue; Christina M Capodilupo; Gina C Torino; Jennifer M Bucceri; Aisha M B Holder; Kevin L Nadal; Marta Esquilin Journal: Am Psychol Date: 2007 May-Jun
Authors: L Ferrucci; J M Guralnik; F Cecchi; N Marchionni; B Salani; J Kasper; R Celli; S Giardini; E Heikkinen; M Jylhä; A Baroni Journal: Gerontologist Date: 1998-06
Authors: Patricia M Davidson; Cynda Hylton Rushton; Jennifer Dotzenrod; Christina A Godack; Deborah Baker; Marie N Nolan Journal: AMA J Ethics Date: 2016-10-01
Authors: Evelyn Wong; Christopher Stevenson; Kathryn Backholer; Mark Woodward; Jonathan E Shaw; Anna Peeters Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Lisa Reber; Jodi M Kreschmer; Tyler G James; Jaime D Junior; Gina L DeShong; Shan Parker; Michelle A Meade Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-18 Impact factor: 4.614