Literature DB >> 31518579

Chicken lines divergently selected on feather pecking differ in immune characteristics.

Jerine A J van der Eijk1, Michel B Verwoolde2, Ger de Vries Reilingh3, Christine A Jansen4, T Bas Rodenburg5, Aart Lammers3.   

Abstract

It is crucial to identify whether relations between immune characteristics and damaging behaviors in production animals exist, as these behaviors reduce animal welfare and productivity. Feather pecking (FP) is a damaging behavior in chickens, which involves hens pecking and pulling at feathers of conspecifics. To further identify relationships between the immune system and FP we characterized high FP (HFP) and low FP (LFP) selection lines with regard to nitric oxide (NO) production by monocytes, specific antibody (SpAb) titers, natural (auto)antibody (N(A)Ab) titers and immune cell subsets. NO production by monocytes was measured as indicator for innate pro-inflammatory immune functioning, SpAb titers were measured as part of the adaptive immune system and N(A)Ab titers were measured as they play an essential role in both innate and adaptive immunity. Immune cell subsets were measured to identify whether differences in immune characteristics were reflected by differences in the relative abundance of immune cell subsets. Divergent selection on FP affected NO production by monocytes, SpAb and N(A)Ab titers, but did not affect immune cell subsets. The HFP line showed higher NO production by monocytes and higher IgG N(A)Ab titers compared to the LFP line. Furthermore the HFP line tended to have lower IgM NAAb titers, but higher IgM and IgG SpAb titers compared to the LFP line. Thus, divergent selection on FP affects the innate and adaptive immune system, where the HFP line seems to have a more responsive immune system compared to the LFP line. Although causation cannot be established in the present study, it is clear that relationships between the immune system and FP exist. Therefore, it is important to take these relationships into account when selecting on behavioral or immunological traits.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feather pecking; Immune system; Natural (auto)antibodies; Nitric oxide production; Specific antibodies

Year:  2019        PMID: 31518579     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Virginie Michel; Jutta Berk; Nadya Bozakova; Jerine van der Eijk; Inma Estevez; Teodora Mircheva; Renata Relic; T Bas Rodenburg; Evangelia N Sossidou; Maryse Guinebretière
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Regulatory T Cell Modulation by Lactobacillus rhamnosus Improves Feather Damage in Chickens.

Authors:  Claire Mindus; Nienke van Staaveren; Dietmar Fuchs; Johanna M Gostner; Joergen B Kjaer; Wolfgang Kunze; M Firoz Mian; Anna K Shoveller; Paul Forsythe; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-11

3.  eQTL analysis of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking identifies KLF14 as a potential key regulator for this behavioral disorder.

Authors:  Alexander Charles Mott; Andrea Mott; Siegfried Preuß; Jörn Bennewitz; Jens Tetens; Clemens Falker-Gieske
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Analysis of the brain transcriptome in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking.

Authors:  Clemens Falker-Gieske; Andrea Mott; Siegfried Preuß; Sören Franzenburg; Werner Bessei; Jörn Bennewitz; Jens Tetens
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Early-life microbiota transplantation affects behavioural responses, serotonin and immune characteristics in chicken lines divergently selected on feather pecking.

Authors:  Jerine A J van der Eijk; T Bas Rodenburg; Hugo de Vries; Joergen B Kjaer; Hauke Smidt; Marc Naguib; Bas Kemp; Aart Lammers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Importance of Basic Research on the Causes of Feather Pecking in Relation to Welfare.

Authors:  Lisa B Fijn; F Josef van der Staay; Vivian C Goerlich-Jansson; Saskia S Arndt
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The light response in chickens divergently selected for feather pecking behavior reveals mechanistic insights towards psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Clemens Falker-Gieske; Jörn Bennewitz; Jens Tetens
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 2.316

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.