| Literature DB >> 31518350 |
Mei S Yamaguchi1, Holly H Ganz2, Adrienne W Cho2, Thant H Zaw2, Guillaume Jospin2, Mitchell M McCartney1, Cristina E Davis1, Jonathan A Eisen2,3,4, David A Coil2.
Abstract
In social animals, scent secretions and marking behaviors play critical roles in communication, including intraspecific signals, such as identifying individuals and group membership, as well as interspecific signaling. Anal sacs are an important odor producing organ found across the carnivorans (species in the mammalian Order Carnivora). Secretions from the anal sac may be used as chemical signals by animals for behaviors ranging from defense to species recognition to signaling reproductive status. In addition, a recent study suggests that domestic cats utilize short-chain free fatty acids in anal sac secretions for individual recognition. The fermentation hypothesis is the idea that symbiotic microorganisms living in association with animals contribute to odor profiles used in chemical communication and that variation in these chemical signals reflects variation in the microbial community. Here we examine the fermentation hypothesis by characterizing volatile organic compounds (VOC) and bacteria isolated from anal sac secretions collected from a male Bengal cat (Felis catus × Prionailurus bengalensis), a cross between the domestic cat and the leopard cat. Both left and right anal sacs of a male Bengal cat were manually expressed (emptied) and collected. Half of the material was used to culture bacteria or to extract bacterial DNA and the other half was used for VOC analysis. DNA was extracted from the anal sac secretions and used for a 16S rRNA gene PCR amplification and sequencing based characterization of the microbial community. Additionally, some of the material was plated out in order to isolate bacterial colonies. Three taxa (Bacteroides fragilis, Tessaracoccus, and Finegoldia magna) were relatively abundant in the 16S rRNA gene sequence data and also isolated by culturing. Using Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), we tentatively identified 52 compounds from the Bengal cat anal sac secretions and 67 compounds from cultures of the three bacterial isolates chosen for further analysis. Among 67 compounds tentatively identified from bacterial isolates, 51 were also found in the anal sac secretion. We show that the bacterial community in the anal sac consists primarily of only a few abundant taxa and that isolates of these taxa produce numerous volatiles that are found in the combined anal sac volatile profile. Several of these volatiles are found in anal sac secretions from other carnivorans, and are also associated with known bacterial biosynthesis pathways. This is consistent with the fermentation hypothesis and the possibility that the anal sac is maintained at least in part to house bacteria that produce volatiles for the host.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31518350 PMCID: PMC6743771 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
16S rRNA gene PCR and sequencing based survey of the Bengal cat anal sacs.
Table shows the number of reads mapping to Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs), summed by taxonomy at the genus level (e.g. everything with the same genus was collapsed into a single column). Not shown are any reads that were placed into ASVs for which the genera of the taxonomic assignments summed to less than 1% of the total number of sequencing reads.
| Right Anal Sac | Left Anal Sac | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # of reads | % | # of reads | % | Genus |
| 15250 | 83% | 17840 | 83% | |
| 1532 | 8% | 1986 | 9% | |
| 709 | 4% | 746 | 3% | |
| 325 | 2% | 390 | 2% | |
| 182 | 1% | 114 | 1% | |
| 117 | 1% | 111 | 1% | |
| 18115 | 98% | 21187 | 98% | n/a |
Identified isolates in this study.
Bolded taxa are those for which we generated volatile data. Taxonomic assignments were made by examining the results of blastn searches of 16S rRNA gene sequences that were generated via PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing.
| Strain ID | Genus | Species |
|---|---|---|
| UCD-MLI | ||
| UCD-MBD1A | ||
| UCD-MBD2A | ||
| UCD-MD1A | ||
| UCD-MD1C | ||
| UCD-MD1E | ||
| UCD-MD2A | ||
| UCD-MLB | ||
| UCD-MLH | sp. | |
| UCD-ACL3 | sp. | |
| UCD-AD1A | sp. | |
| UCD-AD2B1 | sp. | |
| UCD-AD2B2 | sp. | |
| UCD-AD2B3 | sp. | |
| UCD-AD3C | sp. | |
| UCD-MLE | sp. | |
| UCD-MLF | sp. | |
| UCD-MBD1B | sp. | |
| UCD-MBD1C | sp. | |
| UCD-MBD1D | sp. | |
| UCD-MBD1E | sp. | |
| UCD-MBD3A | sp. | |
| UCD-MD3B | sp. |
Tentatively identified compounds (compound name and formula listed) from cultures and anal sac.
The presence of the compound is indicated by a ‘+’ in the column corresponding to each sample: Bengal cat anal sac secretion chemical profile (“Anal sac”) and headspace solid phase microextraction (SPME) for cultures of B. fragilis UCD-AAL1 (“Bf”), Tessaracoccus sp. UCD-MLA (“Tess”), and F. magna UCD-MLG (“Fm”)).
| Bacterial isolates | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound name | Formula | Reference | Anal sac | |||
| cyclohexanone | C6H10O | + | + | + | + | |
| dimethyl trisulfide | C2H6S3 | + | + | + | + | |
| octan-1-ol | C8H18O | Wolf [ | + | + | + | + |
| decan-1-ol | C10H22O | + | + | + | + | |
| 1-(H)-indole | C8H7N | Red fox [ | + | + | + | + |
| dimethyl disulfide | C2H6S2 | + | + | + | ||
| m-xylene | C8H10 | + | + | + | ||
| 2,5-dimethylpyrazine | C6H8N2 | + | + | + | ||
| phenylmethanol | C7H8O | + | + | + | ||
| nonanoic acid | C9H18O2 | Meerkats [ | + | + | + | |
| pentadecanoic acid | C15H30O2 | Lion [ | + | + | + | |
| trichloromethane | CHCl3 | + | + | + | ||
| toluene | C7H8 | Wolf [ | + | + | ||
| 2-aminocyanoacetamide | C3H5N3O | + | + | |||
| butan-1-ol | C4H10O | + | + | |||
| trans-2-pentenoic acid | C5H8O2 | Striped hyena [ | + | + | ||
| Pyrazine | C4H4N2 | + | + | |||
| azetidine | C3H7N | + | + | |||
| 2-Methyl-2-propanyl acrylate | C7H12O2 | + | + | |||
| ethenylbenzene | C8H8 | + | + | |||
| 2-methylpyrazine | C5H6N2 | + | + | |||
| 2-methylcyclopentanone | C6H10O | + | + | |||
| methyl 3-amino-2-methylpropanoate | C5H11NO2 | + | + | |||
| 2-ethylpyrazine | C6H8N2 | + | + | |||
| 1-isopropoxy-1-propene | C6H12O | + | + | |||
| 2-ethyl-5-methylpyrazine | C7H8N2 | + | + | |||
| 2-ethylhexyl formate | C9H18O2 | + | + | |||
| 2-Isobutyl-3,6-dimethyl-pyrazine | C10H16N2 | + | + | |||
| Unknown | + | + | ||||
| N-methyl-1-(methylthio)-2-nitroethenamine | C4H8N2O2S | + | + | |||
| 1-(1,3-thiazol-2-yl)ethanone | C5H5NOS | + | + | |||
| 1-phenylethan-1-one | C8H8O | + | + | |||
| 2-hexylaziridine | C8H17N | + | + | |||
| methyl (Z)-N-hydroxybenzenecarboximidate | C8H9NO2 | + | + | |||
| non-2-enal | C9H17NS | Wolf [ | + | + | ||
| 2-decen-1-ol | C10H20O | + | + | |||
| 4-methyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-thion | C3H5N3S | + | + | |||
| 2-methylhexadecan-1-ol | C17H36O | + | + | |||
| 1-ethyl-5-methyltetrazole | C9H10N4 | + | + | |||
| 3-methylcinnoline | C9H8N2 | + | + | |||
| tetradecanal | C14H28O | Meerkats [ | + | + | ||
| (Z)-(N)-(2-methylpyridin-1-ium-1-yl)benzenecarboximidate | C13H12N2O | + | + | |||
| phenyl carbamate | C7H7NO2 | + | + | |||
| 4-amino-(N)-(3-morpholin-4-ylpropyl)-1,2,5-oxadiazole-3-carboxamide | C10H17N5O3 | + | + | |||
| pentadecyl acetate | C17H34O2 | + | + | |||
| 3,5-di-(tert)-butylphenol | C14H22O | + | + | |||
| 2-hexyldecan-1-ol | C16H34O | + | + | |||
| decyl decanoate | C20H40O2 | + | + | |||
| (n)-pentyldecanamide | C18H36O2 | + | + | |||
| n-hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 | Lion [ | + | + | ||
| octadecanoic acid | C18H36O2 | Lion [ | + | + | ||
| (Z)-docos-13-enoic acid | C22H42O2 | Giant panda [ | + | + | ||