Literature DB >> 31518099

Which patients are persistently high-risk for hospitalization?

Evelyn T Chang1, Rebecca Piegari, Edwin S Wong, Ann-Marie Rosland, Stephan D Fihn, Sandeep Vijan, Jean Yoon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Many healthcare systems use prediction models to estimate and manage patient-level probability of hospitalization. Patients identified as high-risk at one point in time may not, however, remain high-risk. We aimed to describe subgroups of patients with distinct longitudinal risk score patterns to inform interventions tailored to patients' needs. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective national cohort study.
METHODS: Using a previously validated prediction algorithm, we identified a cohort of 258,759 patients enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) who were in the top 5% of risk for hospitalization within 90 days. During each of the following 24 months, patients were placed in 1 of 6 categories: death, hospitalized, no VHA care, persistently high-risk for hospitalization (≥10% probability), initially high-risk then persistently low-risk (<10% probability), and intermittently high-risk. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify characteristics predictive of being persistently high-risk through the last study month.
RESULTS: After 2 years, 17.7% had died, 13.8% had remained persistently high-risk for hospitalization, 41.5% had become persistently low-risk, and 19.9% were intermittently high-risk. Predictors of being persistently high-risk included urban residence, chronic medical comorbidities, auditory and visual impairment, chronic pain, any cancer diagnosis, and social instability.
CONCLUSIONS: Few patients who were high-risk for hospitalization at baseline remained so. Nonrandomized evaluations of interventions that identify patients based on a single high-risk score may spuriously appear to have positive effects. Clinical interventions may need to focus on individuals who are persistently high-risk.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31518099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  3 in total

Review 1.  Data Science Methods for Nursing-Relevant Patient Outcomes and Clinical Processes: The 2019 Literature Year in Review.

Authors:  Mary Anne Schultz; Rachel Lane Walden; Kenrick Cato; Cynthia Peltier Coviak; Christopher Cruz; Fabio D'Agostino; Brian J Douthit; Thompson Forbes; Grace Gao; Mikyoung Angela Lee; Deborah Lekan; Ann Wieben; Alvin D Jeffery
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Outcomes that Matter: High-Needs Patients' and Primary Care Leaders' Perspectives on an Intensive Primary Care Pilot.

Authors:  Michelle S Wong; Tana M Luger; Marian L Katz; Susan E Stockdale; Nate L Ewigman; Jeffrey L Jackson; Donna M Zulman; Steven M Asch; Michael K Ong; Evelyn T Chang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  "Staying at Home": A pivotal trial of telemedicine-based internal medicine hospitalization at a nursing home.

Authors:  G Barkai; H Amir; O Dulberg; E Itelman; G Gez; T Carmon; L Merhav; S Zigler; A Atamne; O Pinhasov; E Zimlichman; G Segal
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-09-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.