Literature DB >> 31517855

Multi-drug resistant Enterococcus faecium in late-onset keratitis after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: A case report and review of the literature.

Francesco D'Oria1, Alessandra Galeone, Valentina Pastore, Nicola Cardascia, Giovanni Alessio.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Interface keratitis after lamellar keratoplasty is one of the causes of graft failure. We report the first case of microbiologically proven Enterococcus faecium infection following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and review the available literature. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 37-years-old Caucasian man presented with pain, redness and severe vision loss in his right eye. Five weeks before, he underwent DALK using the FEMTO LDV Z8 in the same eye for the surgical correction of keratoconus. DIAGNOSES: Upon presentation, slit-lamp biomiscroscopy revealed corneal graft edema with multiple infiltrates located in the graft-host interface.
INTERVENTIONS: Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) was carried out in addition with cultures of the donor lenticule removal. Laboratory results isolated a multi-resistant Enterococcus faecium interface infection. According to the antibiogram, the patient was treated with systemic Tigecycline and Linezolid for 7 days. OUTCOMES: During the following weeks, clinical features improved over time and no signs of active infection were visible seven months postoperatively. LESSONS: Early PKP showed to be a good therapeutic option with great anatomic and functional outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31517855      PMCID: PMC6750735          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


Introduction

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) represents an efficient technique for corneal diseases not affecting the endothelium. This technique presents many advantages over penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), such as the maintenance of globe integrity and the absence of irreversible graft rejection.[ Interface keratitis after corneal transplantation is one of the causes of graft failure and is associated with poor vision. Although infrequent, keratitis after lamellar keratoplasty may threaten corneal graft clarity and may cause endophthalmitis with potential need for enucleation. Diagnosis and treatment of interface keratitis is a challenge, due to the deep stromal location that precludes access for microbial examination and topical drug penetration in the site of infection.[ We describe herein the first case of Enterococcus faecium infection following DALK, successfully treated with targeted systemic therapy with Tigecycline and Linezolid associated with therapeutic PKP.

Case report

A 37-year-old Caucasian man was referred to our clinic for surgery evaluation in a case of advanced keratoconus in the right eye. His best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/200 and preoperative topography (Sirius; Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy) showed an Amsler–Krumeich stage IV keratoconus in the right eye (Fig. 1) and the patient was scheduled for a DALK.
Figure 1

Topography showed an infero-temporal paracentral corneal steepening. Sim-K reading were 62.08 D and 72.68 D in the flat and steep axis respectively, with a corneal thinning point of 286 μm.

Topography showed an infero-temporal paracentral corneal steepening. Sim-K reading were 62.08 D and 72.68 D in the flat and steep axis respectively, with a corneal thinning point of 286 μm. On April 2018, the patient underwent femtosecond laser-assisted mushroom-configuration DALK in his right eye, performed with the FEMTO LDV Z8 femtosecond laser (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland). Surgery was uneventful, and the early post-operative course was unremarkable. The patient was discharged 2 days after surgery, and was instructed to instill atropine 1% eye drops twice daily, chloramphenicol 0,5% and dexamethasone 0,1% eye drops 4 times daily associated with systemic ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily and prednisone 25 mg once a day. During the subsequent follow-up visits, no signs of active ocular infection were detected. Five weeks post-operatively, the patient presented at our Department with pain, red eye, and loss of vision in the operated eye. Visual acuity was limited to hand motion and slit-lamp examination revealed corneal graft edema with multiple whitish infiltrates (Fig. 2, part A); anterior segment-Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) (MS-39) confirm the location of the infiltrates at the graft-host interface (Fig. 2, part B). Due to the suspicion of Candida infection, we started a topic and systemic therapy with Voriconazole. Since clinical picture continued to worsen despite therapy, therapeutic femtosecond laser-assisted PKP was performed to avoid endophthalmitis and to obtain a specimen for bacteriological examination. By using FEMTO LDV Z8, it has been possible to match the exact shape of the removed and donated tissue segments, so that the prepared donor transplant nestles perfectly in the opened eye. Aqueous cultures obtained before PKP were negative for bacterial and fungal growth. Excised cornea cultures yielded E faecium; it was tested for antibiotic susceptibility to 14 antibiotics and was found to be resistant to twelve antibiotics including: ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, cefuroxime, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamycin, imipenem, moxifloxacin, streptomycin, teicoplanin, tetracycline, and vancomycin. The antibiogram revealed that the microorganism was sensitive to tigecycline (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≤ 0.12) and linezolid (MIC = 2). Therefore, medical treatment was shifted to tigecycline 50 mg 2 times a day and linezolid 600 mg 2 times a day for a week as off-label regimen. Additionally, topical tetracycline 1% eye drop was prescribed every 4 hours. Clinical picture improved soon after targeted therapy and currently, at 7 month follow-up, the corneal graft is clear and BCVA is 20/25 (Fig. 2, part C).
Figure 2

(A) Multiple whitish infiltrates with less defined margins are visible at the donor–recipient interface 5 weeks after surgery (B) Anterior segment-OCT shows infiltrates at the graft-host interface (C) Clear graft 7 months after therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

(A) Multiple whitish infiltrates with less defined margins are visible at the donor–recipient interface 5 weeks after surgery (B) Anterior segment-OCT shows infiltrates at the graft-host interface (C) Clear graft 7 months after therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

Discussion

Enterococcus faecalis – formerly classified as part of the group D Streptococcus system – is a Gram-positive, commensal bacterium habiting the gastrointestinal tracts of humans and other mammals.[ They are a leading cause of nosocomial infection, resistant to many antimicrobials, especially vancomycin-resistant.[ Although Enterococci have been described as a relatively uncommon cause of endophthalmitis post-keratoplasty,[ to the best of Authors’ knowledge E faecium graft infection following DALK has not yet been described. We performed an extensive review of the literature about ocular infection after DALK using the Medline/Pubmed database from January 2000 to February 2019. The free-text search terms “keratitis”, “interface”, “infection”, “keratoplasty,” and “lamellar” were used. Two independent observers (F.D. and A.G) reviewed the abstracts to determine the eligibility of studies for inclusion. Articles that presented aggregate patient data (e.g., clinical trials in which data on individual patients were not reported) were excluded. A total of 84 relevant publications were identified. Of these studies, specific case information was available for 17 cases.[ The salient clinical findings of these cases are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Included studies in chronological order and main clinical patient characteristics.

Included studies in chronological order and main clinical patient characteristics. According to the literature, the development of multiple infiltrates located in the donor-recipient interface was the first sign of keratitis, without any signs of inflammation in the anterior chamber. Laboratory investigations, including either corneal scraping or excised cornea culture, were taken to identify the microorganism and yielded Candida spp.,[Klebsiella pneumonia,[Alternaria,[Mycobacterium chelonae,[Aspergillus flavus,[ Gram-positive Cocci,[Actynomices,[Lecytophora mutabilis[ and Herpes simplex virus.[ Infectious pathogens were identified from cultures of the excised donor buttons in almost all cases and from the culture and smear tests from the material employed to irrigate the graft–host interface in 1 case. Donor rim cultures resulted positive in 3 of 5 cases, with correspondence to the organisms identified in the recipients. In our case, microbiological analysis of the excised donor button disclosed the diagnosis of E faecium infection. None of these patients developed endophthalmitis: these data suggest that in anterior lamellar keratoplasties, the Descemet Membrane in capable to avoid or at least delay the intraocular penetration of microorganism. Although the development of endophthalmitis may be hampered in the setting of postoperative DALK interface infection, the typical location at the interface could be more difficult to treat, making conventional approach to the treatment of microbial keratitis more likely to fail. In fact, none except 1 case responded to medical treatment alone[ and almost all the reported cases of infection required subsequent surgical treatment, either donor button exchange or PKP, to resolve the infection. The result of our case should be interpreted in the light of certain limitations. Specifically, donor rim cultures were not performed, and the possibility of donor contamination cannot be ruled out. Our report provides evidence of the protective property of DALK of hampering the direct intraocular penetration of microorganisms in case of donor graft microbial contamination, allowing good outcome, obtain with PKP, even in case of multi-resistant bacterium.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Dr Date P. for the help in proofreading the style of the paper.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Francesco D’Oria. Data curation: Francesco D’Oria, Alessandra Galeone, Valentina Pastore, Nicola Cardascia, Giovanni Alessio. Formal analysis: Francesco D’Oria. Investigation: Francesco D’Oria, Alessandra Galeone, Valentina Pastore, Nicola Cardascia, Giovanni Alessio. Methodology: Francesco D’Oria, Giovanni Alessio. Supervision: Francesco D’Oria, Giovanni Alessio. Validation: Francesco D’Oria, Giovanni Alessio. Visualization: Francesco D’Oria, Alessandra Galeone, Valentina Pastore, Nicola Cardascia, Giovanni Alessio. Writing – original draft: Francesco D’Oria, Alessandra Galeone, Valentina Pastore, Nicola Cardascia, Giovanni Alessio. Writing – review & editing: Francesco D’Oria, Alessandra Galeone, Valentina Pastore, Nicola Cardascia, Giovanni Alessio. Francesco D’Oria orcid: 0000-0002-5702-8595.
  20 in total

1.  Recurrent Lecythophora mutabilis keratitis and endophthalmitis after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Robert E Fintelmann; William Gilmer; Michele M Bloomer; Bennie H Jeng
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01

2.  Candida interface keratitis following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Ayse E Bahadir; Tahir K Bozkurt; Selda Aktay Kutan; Cemil A Yanyali; Suphi Acar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  A case of interface keratitis following anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Douglas A Lyall; Sathish Srinivasan; Fiona Roberts
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 6.048

4.  Fungal interface keratitis by Candida orthopsilosis following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Julia M Wessel; Björn O Bachmann; Ralph Meiller; Friedrich E Kruse
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-01-23

5.  [Corneal melting after cross-linking and deep lamellar keratoplasty in a keratoconus patient].

Authors:  P Eberwein; C Auw-Hädrich; F Birnbaum; P C Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.700

6.  Candida interface keratitis after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: clinical, microbiologic, histopathologic, and confocal microscopic reports.

Authors:  Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi; Ali Reza Foroutan; Mohsen Rahmati Kamel; Nikoo Afsar; Mohammad Ali Javadi
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Candida albicans interface infection after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Luigi Fontana; Gabriella Parente; Bruna Di Pede; Giorgio Tassinari
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Candida albicans interface infection after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Sedaghat; Setareh Sagheb Hosseinpoor
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Alternaria keratitis after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mekhla Naik; Jay Sheth; S K Sunderamoorthy
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

Review 10.  Interface infectious keratitis after anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clinical features and treatment strategies. A review.

Authors:  Luigi Fontana; Antonio Moramarco; Erika Mandarà; Giuseppe Russello; Alfonso Iovieno
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Value of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in Different Types of Corneal Infections: An Update.

Authors:  Ahmed A Abdelghany; Francesco D'Oria; Jorge Alio Del Barrio; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.