Literature DB >> 31517653

Clinicopathologic Association and Prognostic Value of MELF Pattern in Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinoma (ECA) as Classified by IECC.

Sheila E Segura, Lien Hoang, Monica Boros, Cristina Terinte, Anna Pesci, Sarit Aviel-Ronen, Takako Kiyokawa, Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero, Esther Oliva, Kay J Park, Robert A Soslow, Simona Stolnicu.   

Abstract

Microcystic, elongated, and fragmented (MELF) pattern of myometrial invasion is correlated with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and lymph node metastases in uterine endometrioid carcinoma but has not been described in endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA). A total of 457 ECAs were collected, and clinical/morphologic parameters correlated with follow-up data. Potential associations between MELF pattern and age, human papillomavirus status, tumor size/grade, LVI, lymph node metastases, Silva pattern were analyzed. Statistical analyses of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, progression-free survival (PFS) were conducted using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and compared using the Log-rank test. Of 292 ECAs analyzed, 94 (32.19%) showed MELF invasion pattern (MELF-positive). Significant statistical correlation was found between MELF-positive and tumor size (P=0.0017), LVI (P=0.007), Silva pattern (P=0.0005); age, human papillomavirus status, tumor grade, lymph node metastases did not correlate. Fifty-five of 292 patients recurred (18.83%): 18/94 (19.14%) MELF-positive, 37/198 (18.68%) MELF-negative. PFS in MELF-positive: 77.2% and 64.5% at 5 and 10 yr, respectively; PFS in MELF-negative: 82% and 68.5% at 5 and 10 yr, respectively. On multivariate analysis for PFS and other prognostic parameters, only LVI was statistically significant (P=0.001). OS in MELF-positive was 86% and 74.1% at 5 and 10 yr, respectively; OS in MELF-negative, was 89.7% and 86% at 5 and 10 yr, respectively. Median survival was worse in MELF-positive (199.8 mo) versus MELF-negative (226.1 mo); this was not statistically significant. On multivariate analysis for OS and other prognostic parameters, only tumor stage was statistically significant (P=0.002). In ECAs, MELF is not independently associated with survival. Pathologic characteristics of MELF-positive (size, LVI, Silva pattern) versus MELF-negative tumors differ significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31517653      PMCID: PMC7064387          DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol        ISSN: 0277-1691            Impact factor:   3.326


  25 in total

1.  Disseminated tumor cells are not associated with established risk factors, L1CAM immunoreactivity and outcome in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Stefan Kommoss; Andreas D Hartkopf; Bernhard Krämer; Anne-Kathrin Bunz; Friederike Grevenkamp; Felix Kommoss; Jana Pasternak; Sabine M Arbabi; Markus Wallwiener; Annette Staebler; Sigurd F Lax; Sara Y Brucker; Florin-Andrei Taran
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium.

Authors:  Sergio Pecorelli
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC): A New Pathogenetic Classification for Invasive Adenocarcinomas of the Endocervix.

Authors:  Simona Stolnicu; Iulia Barsan; Lien Hoang; Prusha Patel; Cristina Terinte; Anna Pesci; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Takako Kiyokawa; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Malcolm C Pike; Esther Oliva; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Lymphovascular space invasion in microcystic elongated and fragmented (MELF)-pattern well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma is associated with a higher rate of lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Johann D Hertel; Phyllis C Huettner; John D Pfeifer
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.762

5.  Pattern-based classification of invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma, depth of invasion measurement and distinction from adenocarcinoma in situ: interobserver variation among gynecologic pathologists.

Authors:  Carlos Parra-Herran; Monica Taljaard; Bojana Djordjevic; M Carolina Reyes; Lauren Schwartz; John K Schoolmeester; Ricardo R Lastra; Charles M Quick; Anna Laury; Golnar Rasty; Marisa R Nucci; Brooke E Howitt
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Unusual epithelial and stromal changes in myoinvasive endometrioid adenocarcinoma: a study of their frequency, associated diagnostic problems, and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Shawn K Murray; Robert H Young; Robert E Scully
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  Application of a Pattern-based Classification System for Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinoma in Cervical Biopsy, Cone and Loop Electrosurgical Excision (LEEP) Material: Pattern on Cone and LEEP is Predictive of Pattern in the Overall Tumor.

Authors:  Bojana Djordjevic; Carlos Parra-Herran
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  Association between Morphological Patterns of Myometrial Invasion and Cancer Stem Cell Markers in Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ji Y Park; Daegy Hong; Ji Young Park
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  Pattern classification of endocervical adenocarcinoma: reproducibility and review of criteria.

Authors:  Joanne K L Rutgers; Andres A Roma; Kay J Park; Richard J Zaino; Abbey Johnson; Isabel Alvarado; Dean Daya; Golnar Rasty; Teri A Longacre; Brigitte M Ronnett; Elvio G Silva
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  The Potential Roles of MELF-Pattern, Microvessel Density, and VEGF Expression in Survival of Patients with Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma: A Morphometrical and Immunohistochemical Analysis of 100 Cases.

Authors:  Dmitry Aleksandrovich Zinovkin; Md Zahidul Islam Pranjol; Daniil Rudolfovich Petrenyov; Eldar Arkadievich Nadyrov; Oleg Gennadievich Savchenko
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2017-09-14
View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinicopathological and Molecular Differences Between Gastric-type Mucinous Carcinoma and Usual-type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.

Authors:  Hera Jung; Go Eun Bae; Hye Min Kim; Hyun-Soo Kim
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

2.  Usual-Type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma with a Microcystic, Elongated, and Fragmented Pattern of Stromal Invasion: A Case Report with Emphasis on Ki-67 Immunostaining and Targeted Sequencing Results.

Authors:  Sangjoon Choi; Soohyun Hwang; Sung-Im Do; Hyun-Soo Kim
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2020-11-30

3.  Survey Results on Pathologic Aspects of Endocervical Adenocarcinoma by the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

Authors:  W Glenn McCluggage; Joseph T Rabban; Naveena Singh; Esther Oliva
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.326

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.