| Literature DB >> 31517126 |
Abstract
The comparison between Tramadol drug loaded microspheres prepared from gelatin/Entities:
Keywords: Drug delivery systems; Interpenetrating networks; Morphology; Nano-particles- carboxymethyl cellulose; Natural product chemistry; Pharmaceutical chemistry
Year: 2019 PMID: 31517126 PMCID: PMC6731332 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1TEM image of nanocellulose (a) as-formed and (b) single nanoparticle of cellulose.
Schematic representation of the synthesis of gelatin/NaCMNC microspheres.
| Formation code | NaCMNC % (w/w) | Gelatin % (w/w) | Drug loading % | GA mL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 10 | 90 | 20 | 5 |
| F2 | 10 | 90 | 20 | 10 |
| F3 | 10 | 90 | 40 | 5 |
| F4 | 10 | 90 | 40 | 10 |
| F5 | 20 | 80 | 20 | 5 |
| F6 | 20 | 80 | 20 | 10 |
| F7 | 20 | 80 | 40 | 5 |
| F8 | 20 | 80 | 40 | 10 |
Schematic representation of the synthesis of gelatin/NaCMC microspheres.
| Formation code | NaCMC% (w/w) | Gelatin% (w/w) | Drug loading% | GA mL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | 10 | 90 | 20 | 5 |
| H2 | 10 | 90 | 20 | 10 |
| H3 | 10 | 90 | 40 | 5 |
| H4 | 20 | 80 | 40 | 10 |
| H5 | 20 | 80 | 20 | 5 |
| H6 | 20 | 80 | 20 | 10 |
Fig. 2Determination of λ max of drug at 345 nm.
Fig. 3Calibration curve of different concentrations of pure tramadol drug.
Fig. 4FTIR spectra of: (a) NaCMC and (b) NaCMNC.
FTIR absorption bands of NaCMNC and NaCMC.
| Assignment | Peak position, cm−1 | |
|---|---|---|
| NaCMNC | NaCMC | |
| O–H stretching | 3452 | 3520 |
| aliphatic C–H stretching | 2928 | 2935 |
| Asymmetric and symmetric stretching of the carboxylate group. | 1610 and 1430 | 1700 and 1420 |
| C–O–C stretching vibration | 1074 | 1075 |
Fig. 5FTIR spectra of drug loaded microspheres: (a) Gelatin/NaCMC and (b) Gelatin/NaCMNC.
FTIR spectral data of tramadol drug loaded microspheres: (a) Gelatin/NaCMC and (b) Gelatin/NaCMNC.
| Assignment | Peak position, cm−1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Gelatin/NaCMC | Gelatin/NaCMNC | |
| Imine group (C=N) stretching. | 1647 | 1647 |
| O–H stretching. | 3431 | 3431 |
| Aliphatic C–H stretching. | 2669 | 2956 |
| Aliphatic C–H bending. | 1440 | 1450 |
| C–O–C stretching vibration. | 1070 | 1060 |
| Aromatic C–H bending. | 726 | 726 |
| Aromatic C–H stretching. | 2956 | 2919 |
| Monosubstituted phenyl ring. | 660 | 660 |
Fig. 6The reaction mechanism of the formation of semi-IPN.
Fig. 7SEM images of the produced microspheres: (a) Complete microcapsule, (b) The porosity of microsphere, (c) The extrusion of microspheres and the change in shape from spherical into polygon, and (d) The microsphere after releasing the drug.
Effect of different formulations on the properties of gelatin/NaCMNC microsphere.
| Formulation code | Theoretical yield wt. of drug loaded microsphere (g) | Actual yield wt. of drug loaded microsphere (g) | Mass loss (%) | Product yield (%) | Encapsulation efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 5.2 | 4.19 | 19.4 | 80.6 | 44 |
| F2 | 8 | 5.79 | 27.63 | 72.37 | 25.8 |
| F3 | 5.6 | 4.31 | 21.96 | 78.04 | 24.4 |
| F4 | 8.4 | 6.69 | 20.36 | 79.64 | 25.6 |
| F5 | 4 | 3.44 | 14 | 86 | 55 |
| F6 | 6.8 | 5.65 | 16.91 | 83.1 | 15.18 |
| F7 | 4.2 | 3.47 | 17.38 | 82.62 | 8.8 |
| F8 | 7 | 5.45 | 22.14 | 77.86 | 14.08 |
Effect of different formulations on the properties of gelatin/NaCMC microsphere.
| Formulation code | Theoretical yield wt. of drug loaded microsphere (g) | Actual yield wt. of drug loaded microsphere (g) | Mass loss (%) | Product yield (%) | Encapsulation efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 40.81 | 60 | 66.39 |
| H2 | 7.7 | 1.19 | 84.54 | 15.45 | 61.35 |
| H3 | 5.6 | 3.62 | 35.35 | 64.6 | 68 |
| H4 | 8.4 | 4.82 | 42.61 | 57.38 | 25 |
| H5 | 5.2 | 4.75 | 8.65 | 91.34 | 55 |
| H6 | 8 | 3.15 | 60.6 | 39.3 | 28.9 |
The percentage equilibrium water uptake data of the cross linked gelatin/NaCMNC microspheres.
| Formulation code | Mass of dry microspheres (g) | Mass of swollen microspheres (g) | Water up taken (w/w%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 0.082 | 0.123 | 50 |
| F2 | 0.0699 | 0.102 | 45.92 |
| F3 | 0.086 | 0.115 | 40.7 |
| F4 | 0.045 | 0.066 | 33.7 |
| F5 | 0.05 | 0.2532 | 386.97 |
| F6 | 0.0614 | 0.299 | 375.9 |
| F7 | 0.0494 | 0.297 | 501.214 |
| F8 | 0.00535 | 0255 | 376.635 |
The percentage equilibrium water uptake data of the cross linked gelatin/NaCMC microspheres.
| Formulation code | Mass of dry microspheres (g) | Mass of swollen microspheres (g) | Water up take (w/w %) |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | 0.0353 | 0.2636 | 646.74 |
| H2 | 0.0179 | 0.111 | 520.67 |
| H3 | 0.0329 | 0.2 | 507.9 |
| H4 | 0.172 | 0.103 | 495.37 |
| H5 | 0.0412 | 0.1999 | 385.194 |
| H6 | 0.0260 | 0.1116 | 329.23 |
Fig. 8The percentage cumulative drug release of gelatin/NaCMNC microspheres.
Fig. 9The percentage cumulative drug release of gelatin/NaCMC microspheres.
Comparison between this study and the other related studies.
| Comparison | This study | Study 1 | Study 2 | Study3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tittle | Comparison between gelatin/carboxymethyl cellulose and gelatin/carboxymethyl nanocellulose with respect to tramadol drug loaded capsule | CMC/gelatin Blends loaded with Piroxicam: Preparation, characterization, and evaluation of | Iron cross-linked carboxymethyl cellulose-gelatin complex coacervate beads for sustained drug delivery | Preparation and evaluation of gelatin/sodium carboxymethyl cellulose polyelectrolyte complex micro particles for controlled delivery of isoniazid |
| Aim | To compare two types of microspheres gelatin/carboxymethyl cellulose and gelatin/carboxymethyl nanocellulose, in controlling the release of the tramadol drug. | To study the effect of the semi-IPN matrix of CMC/gelatin Blends composition on encapsulation and study the kinetic behavior of the release of the piroxicam drug. | To study the | To investigate the optimal conditions for the formation of microparticles of gelatin/sodium carboxymethyl cellulose thus the dependence of drug encapsulation efficiency and release on the reaction conditions. |
| Material | all the chemicals were prepared in our lab NaCMC- NaCMNC- and analyzed by FTIR | The author in (1) has purchased the chemicals used of CMC and cellulose and didn't mention the physical and chemical analysis | The author (2) has purchased the chemicals used of CMC and cellulose and didn't mention the physical and chemical analysis -GA not used as a cross linker but ferric chloride | The author in (3) has purchased the chemical used of CMC and cellulose, and didn't mention the physical and chemical analysis |
| Preparation | Emulsion-crosslinking method using distillated water as dispersing phase | Emulsion-crosslinking method using distillated water as dispersing phase | Emulsion-crosslinking method without GA but ferric chloride in 2-propanol method using distillated water as dispersing phase | Emulsion-crosslinking method using sunflower oil as dispersing phase |
| Formulation | Different formulations were obtained depending on wt.% of gelatin and NaCMC or NaCMNC, and cross linker and drug | Different formulations were obtained based on wt.% of CMC, cross linker, and drug | Different formulations were obtained depending on wt.% of CMC, cross linker, and drug | Different formulations were acquired depending on mmol g−1 cross linker |
| Product yield | Maximum yield of gelatin/NaCMC reached 86% | None | None | none |
| Study of the surface morphology of microsphere | Thoroughly and systematically carried out. | Carried out | Carried out | Carried out |
| Confirmation of the absence of interaction between drug and microsphere | through chemical equation and by FTIR spectroscopy | No chemical equation was used. Matrix-Drug interaction and physical State of active agent (through DSC/XRD) | No chemical equation was used. The stable and crystalline nature of ibuprofen in the beads was confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy and DSC | Chemical equation + FTIR spectroscopy |
| Encapsulation Efficiency% | 68% for gelatin/NaCMC, and 55% for gelatin/NaCMNC microspheres% | Maximum encapsulation efficiency 10.64% | entrapment efficiency reached 98. 5% | Loading efficiency around 60 % |
| Swelling studies: | Swelling reached 501% for gelatin/NaCMNC microspheres and 646.74% for gelatin/NaCMNC microspheres | None | None | Water Uptake % reached 700 % |
| Comparison between percentage cumulative drug release of gelatin/NaCMC microsphere that reached 74% for 12 h and percentage cumulative drug release of gelatin/NaCMNC microsphere reached 66% for 8 h | release kinetics analyses demonstrated that the release process seems to be governed by distinctly kinetic models, considering the composition of the sample. the release can be driven by Fickinianan diffusion | Drug release reached 70% for 48 h | Drug release reached 90% for 48 h |