| Literature DB >> 31517113 |
Ismail Amiri Ghannat Saman1, Mohammad Saaid Dayer1, Majid Pirestani1.
Abstract
Leishmaniasis is a growing health challenge in many parts of Iran, including Kerman Province. Investigating vector ecology and parasite-harboring capacity is prerequisite to the disease control measures. This study included six provincial sites namely Bam (Bm), Dehbakri (Di), Jiroft (Jt), Mohammad-Abad (Md), Rostam-Abad (Rd) and Darb-e-Behesht (Dt) where sand flies were trapped. The specimens were then identified before being exposed to DNA extraction. PCR-RFLP was used to detect leishmanial infection rates and feeding preference of vectors. Diversity indices indicated that the highest effective numbers of species was in plain sites, whereas, the highest expected numbers of species was in mountainous sites. P. papatasi and P. sergenti showed similar feeding preferences to both human and animal bloods. P. papatasi from indoor catches was found infected with Leishmania major at a 2% rate. The ITS1 gene sequences of isolated parasites were >99% similar to related GenBank haplotypes. Bam and Rostam-Abad remain active foci of both types of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). Md and Di are prone to visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Jt is not at risk of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) due to absence of P. sergenti. Sand flies are absent in Dt, probably because of high elevation and cold climate. In conclusion, patterns of climate and ecosystem changes and vector-host-reservoirs interactions must be carefully scrutinized if leishmaniasis is to be controlled in the stricken sites.Entities:
Keywords: Biodiversity index; Biological sciences; Cutaneous leishmaniasis; DNA typing; Ecology; Environmental science; Epidemiology; Health sciences; ITS1 gene; Infectious disease; Insect ecology; Kerman province; PCR-RFLP; Phlebotomine vectors; Vector-borne disease; Veterinary medicine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31517113 PMCID: PMC6734542 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Geographic locations of the study sites in three counties of Kerman Province.
The details of the study sites in the three counties of Kerman province visited during 2016.
| County | Sites | Date | Altitude | coordinate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bam | Town and outskirt villages | 10th Mar–7th Jun 2016 | 1131m | 29°07′45″N, 58°16′13″E |
| Deh-Bakri | 18th Apr–22nd Jul 2016 | 2000 m | 29°03′08″N, 57°54′36″E | |
| Narmashir | Rostam-Abad | 10th April–5th Jul 2016 | 670 m | 28° 57′ N, 58° 42′ E |
| Jiroft | Town | 3rd Apr–25th May 2016 | 680 m | 28°40′ 13″ N, 57°44′ 13″ E |
| Mohammad-Abad | 18th Apr–21st May 2016 | 2423 m | 28°47′03″N 57°10′37″E | |
| Darb-e-Behesht | 4th May–23rd Jul 2016 | 2608 m | 29°14′30″N 57°19′31″E |
Digestion of 630 bp fragmnets of Cyt b genes of blood meals retrieved from captured sand flies.
| Product (bp) | Pattern of digested product (bp) with | |
|---|---|---|
| Human | 623 | No digest |
| Dog | 623 | 522/70 |
| Cow | 623 | 310/300 |
Indices used to measure diversity parameters of study sites.
| Indices | Formula | References |
|---|---|---|
| Expected Species = E(S) | ||
| Shannon's diversity (H′) | H՛ = -ΣPiln Pi | |
| Shannon Equitability = Shannon Evenness | SE = H՛/lnS | |
| Number Eq. D (True Diversity) = Simpson's diversity (D1) | N1 = eH′ | |
| Simpson's Index = True Diversity 2D (Order 2) = Simpson's dominance (D2) | N2 = Reciprocal of Simpson's index = 1/Σipi2 | |
| Simpson's Dominance | SD = Σipi2 | |
| Gini-Simpson Index = Probability of Interspecific Encounter | PIE = 1-SD | |
| Berger–Parker dominance (BP) | d = Nmax/N |
Note: Pi = S/N, S = number of individuals of one species, N max = number of individuals in the most dominant species, N = total number of all individuals in the sample, ln = logarithm to base e.
Distribution of phlebotomine species and their diversity indices in the study sites.
| Elevation (m above sea) | 670 | N | ♂ (%) | ♀ (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sites | |||||||||
| Species | Rd | Jt | Bm | Di | Md | Dt | |||
| 27 (51.9) | 202 (100) | 392 (45.0) | 50 (11.4) | 16 (20.5) | 0 | 687 | 1081 (66) | 547 (34) | |
| 25 (49.1) | 0 | 480 (55.0) | 367 (84.0) | 59 (75.6) | 0 | 931 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (0.9) | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 (100) | - | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (0.5) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 (100) | - | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (1.1) | 3 (3.8) | 0 | 8 | 8 (100) | - | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (0.7) | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 (100) | - | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (1.4) | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 (100) | - | |
| Total samples (N) | 52 | 202 | 872 | 437 | 78 | 0 | 1641 | ||
| No. of species(S) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 3 | - | |||
| R1 Simpson Dominance | 0.501 | 1.00 | 0.505 | 0.719 | 0.616 | ||||
| R2 Shannon Entropy | 0.692 | 0.00 | 0.688 | 0.607 | 0.661 | ||||
(N = Total Number, Ni = number of individuals of each species).
Diversity indices of phlebotomine species in study sites.
| Indices | Sites | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rd | Jt | Bm | Di | Md | |
| Species Richness R | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 3 |
| Estimated no. of species = E(S) | 2.00 | 1 | 2.00 | 3.94 | 2.97 |
| Berger Parker Index pimax | 51.9% | 100.0% | 55.0% | 84.0% | 75.6% |
| R2 = Shannon Entropy1) H′ | 0.6924 | 0.0000 | 0.6880 | 0.6065 | 0.6614 |
| N1 = eH′ Number Eq. D (True Diversity) | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.99 | 1.83 | 1.94 |
| N2 = Simpson's Index True Diversity 2D | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.98 | 1.39 | 1.64 |
| N2/N1 | 1 | 1 | 0.95 | 0.76 | 0.85 |
| R1 = Simpson Dominance SD | 50.1% | 100.0% | 50.5% | 71.9% | 61.6% |
| Shannon Equitability H/lnS | 99.9% | 0.0% | 99.3% | 31.2% | 60.2% |
| Gini-Simpson Index 1-SD | 49.9% | 0.0% | 49.5% | 28.1% | 38.4% |
Fig. 2Electrophoresis of PCR-RFLP product of Cyt b gene of blood imbibed by sand flies digested by HaeIII.
Blood feeding preference of main vector of CL in the study sites.
| Species | Hosts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human (%) | Bovine (%) | Canine (%) | Others (%) | Total | |
| 5 (41.6) | - (0) | 2 (16.8) | 5 (41.6) | 12 | |
| 10 (43.5) | 2 (8.7) | - (0) | 11 (47.8) | 23 | |
| Total | 15 (42.8)* | 2 | 2 | 16 (45.7)** | 35 |
*Human Blood Index (HBI), ** Animal Blood Index (ABI).
Fig. 3Electrophoresis of PCR (A) and PCR-RFLP (B) products of ITS1 gene digested with HaeIII restriction enzyme.
Fig. 4ITS1 sequences alignment from 2 samples of Leishmania major (1 and 2) with recorded sequences of L. major and L. tropica from GenBank using BLAST software. Points and dashes denote identities and gaps respectively.
Fig. 5A Maximum Likelihood tree of relationships between haplotypes of ITS1 sequences of L. major isolated from P. papatasi with its related haplotypes in GenBank using MEGA 5 software. Crithidia fasciculata was used as an out-group. Number 1 and 2 indicate understudy haplotypes.