Literature DB >> 31516997

Talimogene laherparepvec induces durable response of regionally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma in 4 consecutive patients.

Brian C Westbrook1, T Graham Norwood1, Nina L J Terry2, Svetlana B McKee3, Robert M Conry3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  CR, complete response; CT, computed tomography; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; ICB, immune checkpoint blockade; MCC, Merkel cell carcinoma; MCPyV, Merkel cell polyomavirus; Merkel cell carcinoma; ORR, objective response rate; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; PET, positron emission tomography; PFS, progression-free survival; SUV, standardized uptake values; TVEC, talimogene laherparepvec; advanced Merkel cell carcinoma; durable response; immunotherapy; oncolytic virus; regionally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma; talimogene laherparepvec

Year:  2019        PMID: 31516997      PMCID: PMC6728723          DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2019.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAAD Case Rep        ISSN: 2352-5126


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy derived from cutaneous neuroendocrine cells perceiving light touch. MCC usually presents in elderly patients on sun-exposed areas, most commonly of the head and neck. Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is directly involved in the pathogenesis of 80% of MCCs in which clonal integration results in expression of 2 key antigenic oncoproteins. MCPyV-negative tumors harbor many ultraviolet signature mutations with high levels of infiltrating T lymphocytes and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. MCC is thus an attractive target for immunotherapy because virus-positive tumors express foreign oncoproteins, and virus-negative tumors carry ultraviolet signature mutations providing non–self-epitopes for immune recognition. Historically, metastatic MCC was treated with chemotherapy. Although objective response rates (ORR) exceeded 50%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was approximately 3 months with no clear overall survival benefit. Recent phase II trials of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in advanced MCC targeting PD-1 with pembrolizumab or nivolumab or PD-L1 with avelumab have shown ORR of 65% in treatment-naïve patients and 40% following chemotherapy with PFS substantially superior to chemotherapy. However, fewer than 20% of patients achieve complete responses (CR), and the largest trial showed 12 months PFS of 30%. In March 2017, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of avelumab for advanced MCC marked the dawn of a new era of treatment for this highly immune responsive malignancy. Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) is a genetically modified herpes simplex 1 virus that encodes human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to enhance dendritic cell antigen presentation. Intratumoral injection directly lyses malignant cells and alters the microenvironment favoring induction of systemic antitumor immunity. TVEC received an indication for advanced melanoma in October 2015, making it the first FDA-approved oncolytic viral immunotherapy. Here we describe 4 consecutive patients treated with TVEC for regionally advanced MCC that ultimately achieved durable complete responses to therapy all ongoing for up to greater than 27 months following TVEC initiation with minimal toxicity. We have previously reported on cases 1 and 2 but have additional treatment and follow-up information.

Overview of cases

Four elderly white men underwent wide local excision of primary MCC arising in the head or neck (Table I) obtaining negative margins where anatomically possible. Risk factors for development of MCC included advanced age, prolonged statin use in patient 3, and immunosuppression for Crohn's disease in patient 4. Serology from patients 1 and 2 was negative for antibody against MCPyV oncoprotein, although negative predictive value is low. All patients experienced multifocal, regional recurrence within 8 months of initial resection. TVEC therapy was selected based on the immunogenicity of MCC, absence of detectable distant metastases, significant cardiac comorbidity in patients 1 and 2 limiting their tolerance of potentially more toxic treatment, and concern that ICB could exacerbate underlying autoimmune conditions in patients 3 and 4 with Parkinson and Crohn's disease, respectively. Furthermore, avelumab was not FDA approved for MCC until March 2017, after TVEC initiation in patients 1 and 2. TVEC was administered according to the standard dose and schedule for melanoma into all injectable tumors. This treatment consists of an initial dose of 1 to 4 mL of 106 pfu/mL followed 3 weeks later by doses of 1 to 4 mL of 108 pfu/mL at 2-week intervals.
Table I

TVEC treatment outcomes

PatientAge (yr)No. of TVEC injected lesionsBest overall responseDurable response (Y/N)PFS (mo)OS (mo)
1878CRY24+24+
2774CRY1928+
3812CRY10+10+
4763CRY13+13+
Median16+18.5+

RECIST 1.1 response persisting for at least 6 months.

PFS calculated from first dose of TVEC.

Overall survival calculated from first dose of TVEC.

TVEC treatment outcomes RECIST 1.1 response persisting for at least 6 months. PFS calculated from first dose of TVEC. Overall survival calculated from first dose of TVEC.

Case 1

Complete resection of a right cheek MCC was followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Biopsy confirmed regional recurrence 7 months later with 3 dermal nodules, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) found a 9-mm hypermetabolic cutaneous nodule in the right cheek but no evidence of nodal or hematogenous metastases. Within 3 weeks, he had 8 palpable dermal metastases up to 1.4 cm widely distributed over the right side of the face from the orbital rim to the jaw. With the patient's consent, TVEC was administered on 4 occasions into all detectable metastases with toxicity limited to mild fatigue. Nine weeks after treatment initiation, he had a complete clinical response. Serial physical examinations and PET/CTs at 3- to 4-month intervals have found no recurrence for greater than 24 months since initiating TVEC therapy.

Case 2

An apical scalp MCC recurred 1 month after complete resection with palpable left postauricular and level IIA/B cervical lymphadenopathy up to 3 cm with PET standardized uptake values (SUVs) of 9.3 and 11.0, respectively, and no distant metastases. With the patient's consent, TVEC was administered into all palpable metastases on 8 occasions with toxicity limited to mild fatigue and transient nausea. Palpable, injectable disease resolved within 16 weeks, and a neck CT found a partial response by RECIST 1.1 criteria with 46% reduction in index lesions with new central necrosis. PET/CT 4 months later showed resolution of hypermetabolism and further reduction of index lesions by 62% from baseline. Fifteen months after TVEC discontinuation, the patient had a newly palpable, more anterior, left cervical node of 1.6 cm with maximum SUV of 10.7 (Fig 1). Needle biopsy confirmed MCC, and TVEC dosing was resumed. PET/CT 3 weeks after the seventh TVEC dose found shrinkage of the injected node to 1.1 cm with maximum SUV of 2.3 (Fig 1). TVEC was discontinued, and repeat PET/CT in April showed radiographic CR, which is ongoing more than 28 months after initiation of TVEC therapy.
Fig 1

Top row represents pretreatment images including a PET/CT from patient 2 depicting the hypermetabolic left cervical node in (A) and a neck CT from patient 3 showing the left parotid and postauricular nodules (B and C, respectively). Bottom row provides comparable images soon after completing TVEC therapy from patient 2 (D) and patient 3 (E and F).

Top row represents pretreatment images including a PET/CT from patient 2 depicting the hypermetabolic left cervical node in (A) and a neck CT from patient 3 showing the left parotid and postauricular nodules (B and C, respectively). Bottom row provides comparable images soon after completing TVEC therapy from patient 2 (D) and patient 3 (E and F).

Case 3

A left cheek MCC recurred 5 months after complete resection with neck CT showing bulky left parotid and left postauricular nodules 4.1 and 2.8 cm, respectively, with no distant metastases by chest and body CT (Fig 1). Biopsy confirmed surgically incurable MCC. With the patient's consent, TVEC was initiated, and the injected nodules transiently enlarged after the first 3 doses consistent with pseudoprogression but subsequently improved (Fig 2). After the seventh dose, a neck CT found the left parotid nodule had decreased to 2.9 cm and the postauricular nodule to 1.7 cm. An eighth, final dose of TVEC was administered followed 7 weeks later by biopsy of residual fullness in the left parotid region, which found fibroconnective tissue and plasma cells with no malignancy. Neck CT found resolution of the postauricular nodule to linear scarring (Fig 1). Toxicity consisted of mild, transient flu-like symptoms. Physical examinations and serial CT scans at 3-month intervals have shown no recurrence for more than 10 months after TVEC initiation.
Fig 2

Photographs from patient 3 obtained immediately before TVEC initiation (A), with pseudoprogression after the third dose (B), and after dose 6 of 8 with marked improvement (C).

Photographs from patient 3 obtained immediately before TVEC initiation (A), with pseudoprogression after the third dose (B), and after dose 6 of 8 with marked improvement (C).

Case 4

A patient with Crohn's disease treated with infliximab converted to vedolizumab, a gut-selective anti-inflammatory agent, had a right anterior neck MCC. Six months after wide local incision, MCC recurred with 2 palpable, dermal nodules along the scar. CT scans of the chest and body found no distant spread. Before resection could be performed, a third palpable metastasis developed in the right neck. TVEC was initiated with the patient's consent into 3 tumor nodules measuring up to 1.2 cm. After 5 doses, a clinical CR was achieved. Toxicity was minimal with no activation of Crohn's disease, and the patient has maintained a CR with serial physical examinations and PET/CTs for more than 13 months since TVEC initiation.

Discussion

ICB of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions is the most effective approved therapy for surgically incurable MCC. However, CRs are rare, and most patients progress in less than a year. Here we report promising results with TVEC in 4 consecutive patients with recurrent regionally advanced MCC. Durable CRs were achieved in all 4 patients with a median PFS of greater than 16 months and no serious adverse events (Table I). In addition to complete regional response of injected tumors, TVEC has also prevented outgrowth of distant metastases in these high-risk individuals. Our observations parallel the clinical trial experience with TVEC in melanoma showing greatest efficacy in stage IIIB/C patients with regionally advanced disease. Interim analysis of a randomized phase II trial of TVEC neoadjuvant treatment plus surgery versus surgery alone for resectable stage IIIB to IVM1a melanoma found a pathologic CR rate of 21% and an improved R0 resection rate from 41% to 56%. Phase II trials are underway examining TVEC monotherapy in surgically incurable MCC, basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell skin cancer and TVEC with or without radiotherapy for regionally advanced MCC or melanoma (Table II). Until data are available from these prospective studies, our observations provide compelling evidence that TVEC has important clinical activity in this rare malignancy and suggests a potential role for TVEC in marginally resectable MCC worthy of prospective evaluation.
Table II

Current trials of TVEC in cutaneous malignancies

Treatment trial designCancer typesIndicationClinical Trials.govRegistry no.
TVEC monotherapyPhase IIMCC, SCC, and BCCLocally advancedNCT03458117
TVEC ± radiotherapyPhase IIMCC and melanomaLocally advancedNCT02819843
TVEC + nivolumabPhase IIMCC, SCC, and BCCLocally advanced or widely metastaticNCT02978625
TVEC + pembrolizumabPhase Ib/IIImelanomaLocally advanced or widely metastaticNCT02263508

BCC, Basal cell carcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.

Current trials of TVEC in cutaneous malignancies BCC, Basal cell carcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma. Although single-agent TVEC has limited utility in stage IV melanoma with lung or visceral metastases, combining it with ipilimumab CTLA-4 ICB appeared to enhance the ORR and PFS compared with monotherapy with either agent. Similarly, the phase Ib portion of a phase Ib/III trial combining TVEC with pembrolizumab PD-1 ICB in advanced melanoma reported objective responses in 62% of patients with a CR rate of 33%, superior to either single agent. Based on these observations, a basket trial is evaluating the combination of TVEC with nivolumab in advanced or refractory nonmelanoma skin cancers including MCC (Table II). The landscape of available cancer immunotherapeutics is evolving so rapidly that prospective evaluation of monotherapies and combinations in a malignancy as rare as MCC may not allow timely access to treatment. The combination of retrospective case series as provided here and extrapolation from similar, immune-responsive, more prevalent skin malignancies like melanoma may allow clinical implementation of important treatment advances years before prospective data can be obtained.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Merkel cell carcinoma: emerging biology, current approaches, and future directions.

Authors:  Richard Tothill; Vanessa Estall; Danny Rischin
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

2.  Do the immunosuppressive effects of statins increase Merkel cell carcinoma risk?

Authors:  Luca Mascitelli; Mark R Goldstein
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.736

3.  Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Huichen Feng; Masahiro Shuda; Yuan Chang; Patrick S Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Oncolytic Virotherapy Promotes Intratumoral T Cell Infiltration and Improves Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Antoni Ribas; Reinhard Dummer; Igor Puzanov; Ari VanderWalde; Robert H I Andtbacka; Olivier Michielin; Anthony J Olszanski; Josep Malvehy; Jonathan Cebon; Eugenio Fernandez; John M Kirkwood; Thomas F Gajewski; Lisa Chen; Kevin S Gorski; Abraham A Anderson; Scott J Diede; Michael E Lassman; Jennifer Gansert; F Stephen Hodi; Georgina V Long
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Ipilimumab Alone in Patients With Advanced, Unresectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Jason Chesney; Igor Puzanov; Frances Collichio; Parminder Singh; Mohammed M Milhem; John Glaspy; Omid Hamid; Merrick Ross; Philip Friedlander; Claus Garbe; Theodore F Logan; Axel Hauschild; Celeste Lebbé; Lisa Chen; Jenny J Kim; Jennifer Gansert; Robert H I Andtbacka; Howard L Kaufman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Efficacy and safety of talimogene laherparepvec versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with stage IIIB/C and IVM1a melanoma: subanalysis of the Phase III OPTiM trial.

Authors:  Kevin J Harrington; Robert Hi Andtbacka; Frances Collichio; Gerald Downey; Lisa Chen; Zsolt Szabo; Howard L Kaufman
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Immunotherapy for Merkel cell carcinoma: a turning point in patient care.

Authors:  Isaac S Chan; Shailender Bhatia; Howard L Kaufman; Evan J Lipson
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 13.751

8.  Talimogene laherparepvec for regionally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma: A report of 2 cases.

Authors:  Jonathan T Blackmon; Ratika Dhawan; Toni M Viator; Nina L Terry; Robert M Conry
Journal:  JAAD Case Rep       Date:  2017-04-14

Review 9.  Immunotherapy in Merkel cell carcinoma: role of Avelumab.

Authors:  Amruth R Palla; Donald Doll
Journal:  Immunotargets Ther       Date:  2018-03-02

10.  Mutational landscape of MCPyV-positive and MCPyV-negative Merkel cell carcinomas with implications for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Gerald Goh; Trent Walradt; Vladimir Markarov; Astrid Blom; Nadeem Riaz; Ryan Doumani; Krista Stafstrom; Ata Moshiri; Lola Yelistratova; Jonathan Levinsohn; Timothy A Chan; Paul Nghiem; Richard P Lifton; Jaehyuk Choi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-19
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts and approaches to merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Marianna Babadzhanov; Nicole Doudican; Reason Wilken; Mary Stevenson; Anna Pavlick; John Carucci
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 2.  Talimogene Laherparepvec in Non-Melanoma Cancers.

Authors:  Antoine Salloum; Jenna Koblinski; Nagham Bazzi; Nathalie C Zeitouni
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2021-11

Review 3.  Scientific and clinical developments in Merkel cell carcinoma: A polyomavirus-driven, often-lethal skin cancer.

Authors:  Tomoko Akaike; Paul Nghiem
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.563

Review 4.  From Merkel Cell Polyomavirus Infection to Merkel Cell Carcinoma Oncogenesis.

Authors:  Nathan A Krump; Jianxin You
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 5.  Advances in Targeting Cutaneous Melanoma.

Authors:  Dimitri Kasakovski; Marina Skrygan; Thilo Gambichler; Laura Susok
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Talimogene laherparepvec resulting in near-complete response in a patient with treatment-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael A Cilento; Oliver Klein; Elizabeth Egan; Rachel Roberts-Thomson
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.