| Literature DB >> 31516869 |
Khoa Van Pham1, Anh Hoang Lan Le1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of the first lower molars that have two roots or three roots and the number of the root canals of the mandibular first molars in the Vietnamese subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).Entities:
Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; Vertucci; distolingual root; mandibular first molar
Year: 2019 PMID: 31516869 PMCID: PMC6714421 DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_52_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Soc Prev Community Dent ISSN: 2231-0762
Sample characteristics
| Age of group | Sample size( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male, | Female, | Total( | |
| 18-<30 | 16 (17) | 25 (34.7) | 41 |
| 30-<50 | 42 (44.7) | 41 (56.9) | 83* |
| >50 | 36 (38.3) | 6 (8.3) | 42 |
| Total | 94 | 72 | 166 |
*Group of 30-50 age was half of sample
Number and frequency of the number of roots and number of root canals in mandibular first molars by position and sex
| Left | Subtotal, | Right | Subtotal, | Total, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male ( | Female ( | Male ( | Female ( | ||||
| Mandibular first molars | |||||||
| Single root | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Two separate roots | 84 | 66 | 150 (90.4) | 78 | 63 | 141 (84.9) | 291 (87.7) |
| Three separate roots | 10 | 6 | 16 (9.6) | 16 | 9 | 25 (15.1) | 41 (12.3) |
| Number of root canals | |||||||
| 2 canals | 1 | 8 | 9 (5.4) | 0 | 6 | 6 (3.6) | 15 (4.5) |
| 3 canals | 69 | 44 | 113 (68.1) | 66 | 42 | 108 (65.1) | 221 (66.6)* |
| 4 canals | 24 | 20 | 44 (26.5) | 28 | 24 | 52 (31.3) | 96 (28.9) |
| Mandibular first molars with four root canals | |||||||
| Two separate roots | 15 | 14 | 29 (65.9) | 12 | 16 | 28 (53.8) | 57 (59.4) |
| Three separate roots | 9 | 6 | 15 (34.1) | 16 | 8 | 24 (46.2) | 39 (40.6) |
*Mandibular first molars with three canals were two-third of the sample
Number and frequency of the number of root canals in each root of two-rooted mandibular first molars
| 1 canal | 2 canals | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesial root, | 16 (5.5) | 275 (94.5) | 291 (100) |
| Distal root, | 235 (80.8) | 56 (19.2) | 291 (100) |
There was no third canal in the mesial root of two-rooted mandibular first molars
Number and frequency of the number of root canals in each root of three-rooted mandibular first molars
| 1 canal | 2 canals | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesial root, | 3 (7.3) | 38 (92.7) | 41 (100) |
| Distobuccal root, | 40 (97.6) | 1 (2.4) | 41 (100) |
| Distolingual root, | 41 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 41 (100) |
There was no third canal in the mesial root of three-rooted mandibular first molars
Configuration of the root canal system in mandibular first molars (n=332)
| Type | Sex | Two-rooted mandibular first molars | Three-rooted mandibular first molars | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesial root(%) | Distal root(%) | Mesial root(%) | Distobuccal root(%) | Distolingual root(%) | ||
| I | Male | 2 | 136 | 2 | 25 | 26 |
| Female | 14 | 99 | 1 | 15 | 15 | |
| Subtotal | 16 (5.5) | 235 (80.8) | 3 (7.3) | 40 (97.6) | 41 (100) | |
| II | Male | 55 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Female | 34 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| Subtotal | 89 (30.6) | 15 (5.2) | 10 (24.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| III | Male | 4 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Female | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Subtotal | 6 (2.1) | 16 (5.5) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0) | |
| IV | Male | 101 | 9 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Female | 76 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Subtotal | 177 (60.8)* | 19 (6,5) | 28 (68.3)* | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| V | Male | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Subtotal | 0 (0) | 5 (1.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| VI | Male | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Female | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Subtotal | 3 (1) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| VII | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| VIII | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Subtotal | Male | 162 | 162 | 26 | 26 | 26 |
| Female | 129 | 129 | 15 | 15 | 15 | |
| Subtotal | 291 | 291 | 41 | 41 | 41 | |
*Type IV canal was majority in the mesial root of mandibular first molars
Configuration of root canal system in two-rooted mandibular first molars by location and sex (n=291)
| Mesial root | Distal root | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male( | Female( | Subtotal, | Male( | Female( | Subtotal, | |
| Type I | 2 | 14 | 16 (5.5) | 136 | 99 | 235 (80.8)* |
| Type II | 55 | 34 | 89 (30.6) | 4 | 11 | 15 (5.2) |
| Type III | 4 | 2 | 6 (2.1) | 8 | 8 | 16 (5.5) |
| Type IV | 101 | 76 | 177 (60.8) | 9 | 10 | 19 (6.5) |
| Type V | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 5 | 0 | 5 (1.7) |
| Type VI | 0 | 3 | 3 (1.0) | 0 | 1 | 1 (0.3) |
| Type VII | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) |
| Type VIII | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) |
| Subtotal | 162 | 129 | 291 | 162 | 129 | 291 |
*Type I canal was the majority of the distal root of the two-rooted mandibular first molars
Configuration of the root canal system in three-rooted mandibular first molars by location and sex (n=41)
| Type | Mesial root | Distobuccal root | Distolingual root | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male( | Female( | Subtotal, | Male( | Female( | Subtotal, | Male( | Female( | Subtotal, | |
| I | 2 | 1 | 3 (7.3) | 25 | 15 | 40 (97.6) | 26 | 15 | 41 (100)* |
| II | 6 | 4 | 10 (24.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) |
| III | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 1 | 0 | 1 (2.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) |
| IV | 18 | 10 | 28 (68.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) |
| Others | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) |
| Subtotal | 26 | 15 | 41 | 26 | 15 | 41 | 26 | 15 | 41 |
*Type I canal was the majority of the distolingual root of the three-rooted mandibular first molars