| Literature DB >> 31516725 |
S Figueras-Gourgues1, L Fraile2, J Segalés3,4, I Hernández-Caravaca1, R López-Úbeda5,6, F A García-Vázquez1,6, O Gomez-Duran7, B Grosse-Liesner7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nowadays, the most common presentation of PCV-2 is the subclinical infection in piglets after weaning. The success of PCV-2 vaccination is associated with the control of the clinical disease as well as the improvement of production parameters. In consequence, the objective of the present study was to analyse the effect of PCV-2 maternally derived antibody (MDA) levels on vaccine efficacy in piglets vaccinated at three weeks of age with a commercial PCV-2 subunit vaccine. The study was performed analysing a database with 6112 wean-to-slaughter piglets from 4 different European regions.Entities:
Keywords: Piglets; Porcine circovirus type 2; Vaccine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31516725 PMCID: PMC6727566 DOI: 10.1186/s40813-019-0128-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Porcine Health Manag ISSN: 2055-5660
Fig. 1Effect of vaccination on average daily weight gain (ADWG), PCV-2 viral load (represented as area under curve-AUC) and PCV-2 antibody titre. a) Comparison of the average daily weight gain (ADWG, kg/day) in placebo-treatment (n = 2728) and vaccinated animals (n = 2835), b) comparison of the PCV-2 viral load as area under curve (AUC) in placebo-treatment (n = 484) and vaccinated animals (n = 472) and c) comparison of the PCV-2 antibody titre (log10) in placebo-treatment (n = 2728) and vaccinated animals (n = 2835). Different letters (a, b) indicate significant differences (P < 0.05)
Mean of ADWG (kg/day) ± SEM for each of the four studies analysed
| Treatment | Southern Germany [ | Northern Germany [ | United Kingdom [ | France [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo animals ( | 0.61 ± 0.01 a ( | 0.65 ± 0.01 a ( | 0.56 ± 0.01 a ( | 0.66 ± 0.01 a ( |
| Vaccinated animals ( | 0.64 ± 0.01 b ( | 0.67 ± 0.01 b ( | 0.61 ± 0.01 b ( | 0.68 ± 0.01 b ( |
| ADWG difference between groups (g/day) | 30 | 20 | 50 | 20 |
n: number of animals. a,b Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Only the surviving animals per treatment group were used
Mean of MDA (PCV-2 antibody titre (log10)) ± SEM for each of the four studies analysed
| Treatment | Southern Germany [ | Northern Germany [ | United Kingdom [ | France [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo animals ( | 2.80 ± 0.03 ( | 2.87 ± 0.03 ( | 2.42 ± 0.02 ( | 2.56 ± 0.02 ( |
| Vaccinated animals ( | 2.83 ± 0.03 ( | 2.86 ± 0.03 ( | 2.39 ± 0.02 ( | 2.60 ± 0.02 ( |
n: number of animals. No significant differences found (p > 0.05). Only the surviving animals per treatment group were used
Fig. 2Bivariate adjustment between the average daily weight gain (ADWG) and the PCV-2 antibody titre. Graphs show dates for placebo-treatment (n = 2728) a) and vaccinated (n = 2835) animals b). The ADWG of each animal was calculated as the difference in body weight between two measurement periods (4 and 25 weeks of age) divided by the number of days between them
Fig. 3Bivariate adjustment between average daily weight gain (ADWG) and PCV-2 antibody titre divided by PCV-2 titres. Graphs show dates for placebo-treatment (n = 2728) and vaccinated animals (n = 2835). Analysis divided by PCV-2 titres a) placebo low titre (< 2.5 log10; n = 811), b) placebo high titre (≥2.5 log10; n = 1917), c) placebo extremely high titre (≥3.7 log10; n = 300), d) vaccinated low titre (< 2.5 log10; n = 877), e) vaccinated high titre (≥2.5 log10; n = 1958) and f) vaccinated extremely high titre (≥3.7 log10; n = 334)
Mean of ADWG (kg/day) for placebo and vaccinated animals according to the levels of PCV-2 antibody titre
| PCV2 titre | Placebo animals ( | Vaccinated animals ( |
|---|---|---|
| Low titre (< 2.5 log10) | 0.61 a,A (n = 811) | 0.64 a,B (n = 877) |
| High titre (≥2.5 log10) | 0.62 b,A ( | 0.66 b,B ( |
| Extremely high titre (≥3.7 log10) | 0.64 c,A (n = 300) | 0.65 b,A (n = 334) |
a,b,c Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05)
A, B Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Only the surviving animals per treatment group were used
Mean of area under the curve (AUC) of PCV2 load over time for placebo and vaccinated animals according to the levels of PCV-2 antibody titre
| PCV2 titre | Placebo animals ( | Vaccinated animals ( |
|---|---|---|
| Low titre (< 2.5 log10) | 225.0 a,A ( | 63.4 a,B ( |
| High titre (≥2.5 log10) | 188.5 ab,A ( | 55.4 a,B ( |
| Extremely high titre (≥3.7 log10) | 147.6 b,A ( | 75.5 a,B ( |
a,b Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05)
A, B Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Only 15% of randomly pre-selected study animals, chosen as representative sample animals, were used
Fig. 4Bivariate adjustment between the average daily weight gain (ADWG) and the viraemia (represented as area under curve-AUC). Graphs show dates for a) placebo-treatment (n = 472) and b) vaccinated animals (n = 484)
Percentage of mortality for each of the four studies analysed and for the merged data
| Treatment | Southern Germany [ | Northern Germany [ | United Kingdom [ | France [ | Merged data |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo animals (%) | 14 a | 9 | 15 a | 6 | 11 a |
| Vaccinated animals (%) | 10 b | 7 | 5 b | 5 | 7 b |
a,b Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Merged data refers to the grouping of animals of all the farms studied