| Literature DB >> 31516362 |
Jeeva Susan Abraham1, S Sripoorna1, Jyoti Dagar1, Shiv Jangra1, Anit Kumar1, Khushi Yadav1, Simran Singh1, Anusha Goyal1, Swati Maurya1, Geetu Gambhir1, Ravi Toteja1, Renu Gupta2, Dileep K Singh3, Hamed A El-Serehy4,5, Fahad A Al-Misned4, Saleh A Al-Farraj4, Khaled A Al-Rasheid4, Saleh A Maodaa4, Seema Makhija1.
Abstract
The present investigation aims to study the diversity of ciliates from different habitats in and around Delhi, India, and the correlation of this diversity with soil quality {agricultural lands (site 1 and 2), dump yards (site 3 and 4), sewage treatment plant (site 5), residential land (site 6), landfill (site 7) and barren land (site 8)}. Various physicochemical parameters of the different soil samples were studied and analysed for soil texture, interstitial water, pH, conductivity, total organic carbon, total organic matter, total nitrogen and phosphorous content, using standard protocols. Seventeen ciliate taxa belonging to four classes, seven orders, ten families, and 17 genera were recorded, with the maximum number of species (eleven) belonging to the class Spirotrichea. Ciliate diversity was highest at sites 5 and 6 and lowest at sites 1 and 2. Spathidium sp. was the dominant species in the conditioned land (site 8), while the ciliate Colpoda sp. was present in all the sites examined, showing the highest population density in the sewage treatment plant site (site 5). Statistical analysis showed that ciliate diversity was positively correlated to physicochemical parameters such as interstitial water, total organic matter and organic carbon, total nitrogen and total phosphorous content. Analyses of spirotrichs/colpodids (S/C) ratio and diversity indices implied that the habitat conditions of sites 1, 2, 3 and 8 are relatively unfavourable for soil ciliates to flourish; while sites 4, 5, 6 and 7 provided more favourable conditions. The ubiquity of ciliate distribution suggests their important role in the soil food webs and nutrient cycling, and their community structure and specific characteristics appear to be of major importance for soil formation. A full understanding of soil ciliate diversity and physicochemical parameters helps to inform best practice for improving soil quality as well as conservation practices for sustainable development and management of farms and cultivated lands. In conclusion, ciliate diversity serves as an important and sensitive bio-indicator for soil quality.Entities:
Keywords: Ciliate diversity; Ecology; Physicochemical parameters; Soil ciliates; Soil quality
Year: 2019 PMID: 31516362 PMCID: PMC6733776 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.04.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Maps showing the Delhi region and the position of the eight sampling sites (site 1–8).
Locations, descriptive features and anthropogenic activities of the eight sampling sites.
| Site | Coordinates (Latitude Longitude) | General features of anthropogenic activity | Annual temperature |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28°6.0′45″N, 76°13′28.92″E | Agriculture lands, silty soil | 24 |
| 2 | 28°40′26.4″N, 75°50′27.6″E | Agriculture lands, sandy soil | 28 |
| 3 | 25°21′0.00″N, 90°24′45.0″E | Dump yards, sandy soil | 22 |
| 4 | 29°41′8.52″N, 77°59′25.8″E | Dump yards, sandy soil | 21 |
| 5 | 28°35′20.4″N, 77°15′54.0″E | Sewage treatment plant, sandy soil | 24 |
| 6 | 28°32′20.4″N, 77°15′50.4″E | Residential lands, sandy soil | 28 |
| 7 | 28°35′52.8″N, 77°15′14.4″E | Landfill, sandy soil | 23 |
| 8 | 28°35′52.8″N, 77°15′50.4″E | Barren lands, petrol pump, sandy soil | 28 |
Main physicochemical properties of the soil in each of the eight sites investigated in and around Delhi region.
| Site | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil parameter | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| pH | 8.4 | 7.71 | 8.0 | 7.64 | 6.75 | 6.89 | 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Interstitial water (%) | 20.5 | 18.69 | 18.45 | 17.35 | 15.36 | 24.07 | 18.94 | 12.07 |
| Conductivity (dS/m) | 1.74 | 1.64 | 1.41 | 1.49 | 1.41 | 1.17 | 1.49 | 1.74 |
| Total organic matter (%) | 1.69 | 0.48 | 2.12 | 2.61 | 3.87 | 0.36 | 1.34 | 1.62 |
| Total organic carbon (%) | 0.98 | 0.28 | 1.23 | 1.51 | 2.25 | 0.21 | 0.78 | 0.93 |
| Total nitrogen (Kg/ ha) | 28.22 | 21.9 | 65.85 | 67.42 | 250.88 | 153.66 | 21.95 | 34.49 |
| Total phosphorus (ppm) | 0.3 | 0.49 | 0.10 | 1.4 | 1.19 | 0.81 | 0.96 | 0.14 |
Fig. 4Dendrogram shows the cluster analysis of soil physicochemical properties at various sampling sites.
Bivariate correlation of ciliates diversity and abundance with soil physicochemical parameters.
| Soil parameter | With respect to ciliate diversity | With respect to ciliate abundance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson correlation coefficient | Significance | Pearson correlation coefficient | Significance | |
| Water holding capacity | 0.456 | 0.256 | 0.533 | 0.174 |
| pH | −0.862 | 0.006 | −0.335 | 0.418 |
| Electrical conductivity | −0.824 | 0.012 | −0.752 | 0.031 |
| Total organic carbon | 0.009 | 0.984 | −0.115 | 0.787 |
| Total organic matter | 0.007 | 0.988 | −0.118 | 0.780 |
| Total nitrogen | 0.747 | 0.033 | 0.178 | 0.673 |
| Total phosphorus | 0.564 | 0.146 | 0.512 | 0.194 |
Correlation is significant at 0.01 level.
Correlation is significant at 0.05 level.
List of ciliate taxa indicated by their presence (●) or absence (○) in the soil samples collected from the eight different sites.
| Ciliate Taxa | Site 1 | Site 2 | Site 3 | Site 4 | Site 5 | Site 6 | Site 7 | Site 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ● | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | |
| ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ○ | ○ | |
| ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | |
| Total taxa present | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 13 | 3 | 2 |
List of soil ciliate taxa recorded in and around Delhi region during the present study with the constancy of inhabitant species (based on the classification system of Adl et al., 2018).
| Class | Order | Family | Species | Constancy of species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spirotrichea | Stichotrichida | Oxytrichidae | 25 | |
| 62.5 | ||||
| 25 | ||||
| 12.5 | ||||
| 12.5 | ||||
| 25 | ||||
| 12.5 | ||||
| Amphisiellidae | 25 | |||
| 12.5 | ||||
| Holostichidae | 25 | |||
| Uroleptidae | 50 | |||
| Euplotida | Euplotidae | 12.5 | ||
| Litostomatea | Spathidiida | Spathidiidae | 12.5 | |
| Dileptida | Dileptidae | 25 | ||
| Haptorida | Lacrymaridae | 25 | ||
| Oligohymenophorea | Sessilida | Vorticellidae | 12.5 | |
| Colpodea | Colpodida | Colpodidae | 100 | |
| 4 classes | 7 orders | 10 families | 17 species | |
Fig. 2(a–y) Photomicrographs of soil ciliates from life and after protargol impregnations. (a, b) Anatoliocirrus sp. (c, d) Oxytricha sp. (e, f) Sterkiella sp. (g) Paraurostyla sp. (h) Stylonychia sp. (i, j) Nudiamphisella sp. (k, l) Anteholosticha sp. (m, n) Gonostomum sp. (o, p) Fragmospina sp. (q) Hemiamphisiella sp. (r) Uroleptus sp. (s) Euplotes sp. (t) Spathidium sp. (u, v) Colpoda sp. (w) Dileptus sp. (x) Lacrymaria sp. (y) Vorticella sp. Scale bars represent 50 µm (a–t and w–y) and 20 µm (u, v).
Fig. 3Spirotrichs/colpodids (S/C) ratio and total soil ciliate species number (TSN) at each sampling site.
Fig. 5Dendrogram shows community similarity of soil ciliates at various sampling sites.
Fig. 6Dendrogram shows correlation between physicochemical properties and soil ciliate community at various sampling sites.
Biodiversity indices for the eight sites investigated during the present study.
| Biodiversity indices | Site 1 | Site 2 | Site 3 | Site 4 | Site 5 | Site 6 | Site 7 | Site 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon index | 0.67 | 0.27 | 0.59 | 1.64 | 1.99 | 2.41 | 1.05 | 0.61 |
| Dominance index | 0.53 | 0.15 | 0.42 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.66 | 0.46 |
| Simpson index | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.33 | 0.53 |
| Reciprocal Simpson index | 2.12 | 1.18 | 1.73 | 5.88 | 10.91 | 15.4 | 3 | 1.87 |
| Dominance index approximation | 0.48 | 0.14 | 0.40 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.64 | 0.42 |