| Literature DB >> 31516342 |
Farkhanda Asad1, Muhammad Samee Mubarik1, Tayyaba Ali1, Muhammad Kashif Zahoor1, Robina Ashrad1, Samina Qamer1.
Abstract
In aquaculture industry, the aim of feed formulation is to provide the fish with feasible diet to enhance their body. Carbohydrates supplemented with chromium compounds (organic and in-organic) are major energy currencies for biological machinery of fish. Here, this article presents a description that emphasizes the effect of chromium picolinate (organic) and chromium chloride hexahydrate (in-organic) on growth execution and genotoxicity of Labeorohita. Seven groups (each with a replica) with 30 Labeorohita fingerlings were formed: a control group, three groups were supplemented with chromium chloride Hexahydrate (0.3, 0.5 and 0.6 mg kg-1) and three groups were supplemented with Cr-Pic, 0.3, 0.5 and 0.6 mg kg-1) respectively. The experimental group T4 fortified with (Cr-Pic) along with carbohydrates by dose of 0.3 mg/kg demonstrated significant results (P < 0.05). Superior growth for Labeo rohita was observed as compared to control and other experimental groups. Minimum growth trend was observed in group T5 (CP-0.5 mg/kg), T6 (CP-0.6 mg/kg) and T7 (control) respectively. Comet assay results indicated the dose and Cr related (organic or in-organic) genetic damage in fish erythrocytes. Hence, maximum comet parameters (Tail length, Tail DNA and Olive Tail Moment) were observed in (in-organic Cr) by 0.3 mg/kg concentration. This study suggested the toxicity corresponding to in-organic Cr but organic Cr could be used as growth promoter if so. Overall results demonstrated supplementation of organic chromium compounds by 0.3 mg/kg should be reconsidered for growth. This drive of research address the fish farmers to utilize the feed supplemented with organic Cr compounds which is most appropriate to provide sustainable yield as part of increment in growth performance and beneficial health effects for consumers on indices to reduce the toxicity risks.Entities:
Keywords: Growth performance and genotoxicity; In-organic chromium; Labeo rohita; Organic chromium
Year: 2018 PMID: 31516342 PMCID: PMC6733697 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.12.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1(Graphical Demonstration of six treated groups, that are Cr-Pic by 0.3 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg, 0.6 mg/kg, CrCl2 Hexahydrate by 0.3 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg, 0.6 mg/kg and a control group corresponding to Tail length, Tail DNA and Olive Tail moment (OTM) respectively). There could be many reasons of DNA damage in an animal cell including radiations or ultraviolet rays, but the DNA alterations caused due to chemical exposure was an indirect reason. It was perceived during trail that in aquatic organisms, the blood is at first pace of attack of toxicity. Hexavalent chromium taken through diet is more toxic than trivalent form. In result of toxicity, Cr got infused in blood and ultimately in membranes of blood cells, nucleus got deformed, electrophoresed DNA fragments protrude out from cell because eyrythrocytes are more sensitive to toxic substance after gill epithelium. Comet assay proved as unmatched technique to check the genotoxicity. Whereas by comparing both forms of Cr compounds, organic form of Cr (Cr-Pic) demonstrated improved growth, feed efficiency ratio, by mixing with carbohydrates while in-organic form of Cr was also there to demonstrate genotoxicity. Comet assay showed that Cr induced the DNA damage when treated with erythrocytes of Labeorohita for 90 days. Results stated that maximumfrequency of Tail DNA and Tail length were shown by in-organic chromium (chromium chloride hexahydrate 0.3 mg/kg) while minimum trend towards the comet parameters was shown by organic chromium compounds by concentration of 0.5 mg/kg and 0.6 mg/kg respectively. Presence of longer tail, there were noteworthy DNA damages.
Growth performance in Labeorohita fingerlings cultured under different treatments of organic (Cr-Pic.) and in-organic (CrCl2 hexahydrate) chromium compounds.
| Parameters | Experimental diets | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | Control | |
| Initial weight (g) | 1.27 | 1.93 | 1.73 | 1.81 | 2.17 | 1.25 | 2.14 |
| Final weight (g) | 3.30 | 3.34 | 2.91 | 3.67 | 2.93 | 3.12 | 3.33 |
| Weight gain (g) | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.10 | 0.26 | 0.17 |
| Initial length (Cm) | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Final length (Cm) | 6.22 | 6.02 | 5.75 | 6.44 | 6.27 | 6.17 | 6.17 |
| Increase in length (Cm) | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.17 | 0.31 | 0.27 |
| SGR | 1.01 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.78 | 0.33 | 1.06 | 0.49 |
Comparison of means of various comet parameters analyzed in Labeo rohita blood under different treatments of organic and in-organic chromium.
| Treatments | Comet parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tail DNA | Tail length | OTM | |
| T1 (CCH1, 0.3 mg/kg) | 56.57 ± 0.839 | 21.58 ± 0.696 | 3.83 ± 0.144 |
| T2(CCH2, 0.5 mg/kg) | 54.00 ± 0.987 | 16.50 ± 0.612 | 3.81 ± 0.157 |
| T3(CCH3, 0.6 mg/kg) | 26.78 ± 0.806 | 17.52 ± 0.783 | 2.53 ± 0.115 |
| T4 (CP1, 0.3 mg/kg) | 27.74 ± 1.380 | 12.10 ± 0.890 | 3.52 ± 0.248 |
| T5(CP2, 0.5 mg/kg) | 43.98 ± 2.461 | 17.08 ± 0.819 | 2.18 ± 0.142 |
| T6(CP3, 0.6 mg/kg) | 50.56 ± 1.566 | 16.70 ± 0.629 | 2.73 ± 0.139 |
| T7 (control) | 4.12 ± 0.306 | 4.12 ± 0.221 | 2.46 ± 0.165 |