Literature DB >> 31515461

Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Prognostic Molecular Signatures of Stage I Melanoma.

Julia Newton-Bishop1, Jennifer H Barrett1, Jérémie Nsengimana2, Rohit Thakur1,3, Jonathan P Laye1, Martin Lauss4, Joey Mark S Diaz1, Sally Jane O'Shea5,6, Joanna Poźniak1,7,8, Anastasia Filia9, Mark Harland1, Joanne Gascoyne1, Juliette A Randerson-Moor1, May Chan1, Tracey Mell1, Göran Jönsson4, D Timothy Bishop1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previously identified transcriptomic signatures have been based on primary and metastatic melanomas with relatively few American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I tumors, given difficulties in sampling small tumors. The advent of adjuvant therapies has highlighted the need for better prognostic and predictive biomarkers, especially for AJCC stage I and stage II disease. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A total of 687 primary melanoma transcriptomes were generated from the Leeds Melanoma Cohort (LMC). The prognostic value of existing signatures across all the AJCC stages was tested. Unsupervised clustering was performed, and the prognostic value of the resultant signature was compared with that of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and tested as a biomarker in three published immunotherapy datasets.
RESULTS: Previous Lund and The Cancer Genome Atlas signatures predicted outcome in the LMC dataset (P = 10-8 to 10-4) but showed a significant interaction with AJCC stage (P = 0.04) and did not predict outcome in stage I tumors (P = 0.3-0.7). Consensus-based classification of the LMC dataset identified six classes that predicted outcome, notably in stage I disease. LMC class was a similar indicator of prognosis when compared with SNB, and it added prognostic value to the genes reported by Gerami and colleagues. One particular LMC class consistently predicted poor outcome in patients receiving immunotherapy in two of three tested datasets. Biological characterization of this class revealed high JUN and AXL expression and evidence of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.
CONCLUSIONS: A transcriptomic signature of primary melanoma was identified with prognostic value, including in stage I melanoma and in patients undergoing immunotherapy. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31515461     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  16 in total

1.  ROR2 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition by hyperactivating ERK in melanoma.

Authors:  María Victoria Castro; Gastón Alexis Barbero; Paula Máscolo; María Belén Villanueva; Jérémie Nsengimana; Julia Newton-Bishop; Edith Illescas; María Josefina Quezada; Pablo Lopez-Bergami
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.782

2.  Using a Clinicopathologic and Gene Expression (CP-GEP) Model to Identify Stage I-II Melanoma Patients at Risk of Disease Relapse.

Authors:  Evalyn E A P Mulder; Iva Johansson; Dirk J Grünhagen; Dennie Tempel; Barbara Rentroia-Pacheco; Jvalini T Dwarkasing; Daniëlle Verver; Antien L Mooyaart; Astrid A M van der Veldt; Marlies Wakkee; Tamar E C Nijsten; Cornelis Verhoef; Jan Mattsson; Lars Ny; Loes M Hollestein; Roger Olofsson Bagge
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Defining novel causal SNPs and linked phenotypes at melanoma-associated loci.

Authors:  Carolina Castaneda-Garcia; Vivek Iyer; Jérémie Nsengimana; Adam Trower; Alastair Droop; Kevin M Brown; Jiyeon Choi; Tongwu Zhang; Mark Harland; Julia A Newton-Bishop; D Timothy Bishop; David J Adams; Mark M Iles; Carla Daniela Robles-Espinoza
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.121

4.  Loss of Ambra1 promotes melanoma growth and invasion.

Authors:  Luca Di Leo; Valérie Bodemeyer; Francesca M Bosisio; Giuseppina Claps; Marco Carretta; Salvatore Rizza; Fiorella Faienza; Alex Frias; Shawez Khan; Matteo Bordi; Maria P Pacheco; Julie Di Martino; Jose J Bravo-Cordero; Colin J Daniel; Rosalie C Sears; Marco Donia; Daniel H Madsen; Per Guldberg; Giuseppe Filomeni; Thomas Sauter; Caroline Robert; Daniela De Zio; Francesco Cecconi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Bioinformatics-based study to identify immune infiltration and inflammatory-related hub genes as biomarkers for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Sheng Fang; Xin Xu; Lin Zhong; An-Quan Wang; Wei-Lu Gao; Ming Lu; Zong-Sheng Yin
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.846

6.  Tumour gene expression signature in primary melanoma predicts long-term outcomes.

Authors:  David J Adams; Alvis Brazma; Roy Rabbie; Manik Garg; Dominique-Laurent Couturier; Jérémie Nsengimana; Nuno A Fonseca; Matthew Wongchenko; Yibing Yan; Martin Lauss; Göran B Jönsson; Julia Newton-Bishop; Christine Parkinson; Mark R Middleton; D Timothy Bishop; Sarah McDonald; Nikki Stefanos; John Tadross; Ismael A Vergara; Serigne Lo; Felicity Newell; James S Wilmott; John F Thompson; Georgina V Long; Richard A Scolyer; Pippa Corrie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 7.  Nanocarrier-Based Drug Delivery for Melanoma Therapeutics.

Authors:  Mingming Song; Chang Liu; Siyu Chen; Wenxiang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Robust gene expression programs underlie recurrent cell states and phenotype switching in melanoma.

Authors:  Jasper Wouters; Zeynep Kalender-Atak; Liesbeth Minnoye; Katina I Spanier; Maxime De Waegeneer; Carmen Bravo González-Blas; David Mauduit; Kristofer Davie; Gert Hulselmans; Ahmad Najem; Michael Dewaele; Dennis Pedri; Florian Rambow; Samira Makhzami; Valerie Christiaens; Frederik Ceyssens; Ghanem Ghanem; Jean-Christophe Marine; Suresh Poovathingal; Stein Aerts
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 28.213

9.  Study of the Female Sex Survival Advantage in Melanoma-A Focus on X-Linked Epigenetic Regulators and Immune Responses in Two Cohorts.

Authors:  Abdullah Al Emran; Jérémie Nsengimana; Gaya Punnia-Moorthy; Ulf Schmitz; Stuart J Gallagher; Julia Newton-Bishop; Jessamy C Tiffen; Peter Hersey
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Integrated TCGA and GEO analysis showed that SMAD7 is an independent prognostic factor for lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Zhou-Tong Dai; Jun Wang; Kai Zhao; Yuan Xiang; Jia Peng Li; Hui-Min Zhang; Zi-Tan Peng; Xing Hua Liao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.