Literature DB >> 31515327

Primary care renewal strategies in Manitoba: Family physicians' perceptions.

Ashley Struthers1, Colleen Metge2, Catherine Charette3, Karen Harlos4, Sunita Bayyavarapu Bapuji5, Paul Beaudin6, Ingrid Botting7, Alan Katz8, Sara Kreindler9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand family physicians' perceptions of Manitoba's strategies for primary care renewal or reform (PCR).
DESIGN: Qualitative substudy of an explanatory case study.
SETTING: Rural and urban Manitoba. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 60 family physicians (31 fee-for-service physicians, 26 alternate-funded physicians, and 3 physicians representing provincial physician organizations).
METHODS: Semistructured interviews and focus groups. MAIN
FINDINGS: Many physicians were hesitant to participate in PCR initiatives, perceiving clear risks but uncertain benefits to patients and providers. Additional barriers to participation included concerns about the adequacy and import of communication about PCR, the meaningfulness of opportunities for physician "voice," and the trustworthiness of decision makers. There was an appetite for tailored, clinic-level support in addressing concrete, physician-identified problems; however, the initiatives on offer were not widely viewed as providing such support.
CONCLUSION: Although some of the observed barriers might fade over time, concentrating PCR efforts on the everyday realities of family physician practice might be the best way to build a primary care system that works for patients and providers. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31515327      PMCID: PMC6741804     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  22 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.

Authors:  M Q Patton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action.

Authors:  E H Wagner; B T Austin; C Davis; M Hindmarsh; J Schaefer; A Bonomi
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  A framework for engaging physicians in quality and safety.

Authors:  Jonathan M Taitz; Thomas H Lee; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 4.  Toward international primary care reform.

Authors:  Barbara Starfield
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Primary health care in Canada: systems in motion.

Authors:  Brian Hutchison; Jean-Frederic Levesque; Erin Strumpf; Natalie Coyle
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Primary care reform. Physicians' participation in Hamilton-Wentworth.

Authors:  Ieva M Neimanis; J Michael Paterson; Rossano L Allega
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care.

Authors:  Karen Davis; Stephen C Schoenbaum; Anne-Marie Audet
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation.

Authors:  Richard H Glazier; Julie Klein-Geltink; Alexander Kopp; Lyn M Sibley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Did changing primary care delivery models change performance? A population based study using health administrative data.

Authors:  R Liisa Jaakkimainen; Jan Barnsley; Julie Klein-Geltink; Alexander Kopp; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Family physician views about primary care reform in Ontario: a postal questionnaire.

Authors:  Duncan J W Hunter; Samuel E D Shortt; Peter M Walker; Marshall Godwin
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.