Literature DB >> 31515234

Peritoneal Dialysis Patient Outcomes under the Medicare Expanded Dialysis Prospective Payment System.

Eric W Young1,2, Alissa Kapke3, Zhechen Ding3, Regina Baker2, Jeffrey Pearson3, Chad Cogan3, Purna Mukhopadhyay3, Marc N Turenne3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) use increased in the United States with the introduction of a new Medicare prospective payment system in January 2011 that likely reduced financial disincentives for facility use of this home therapy. The expansion of PD to a broader population and facilities having less PD experience may have implications for patient outcomes. We assessed the impact of PD expansion on PD discontinuation and patient mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A prospective cohort study was conducted of patients treated with PD at 90 days of ESKD. Patients were grouped by study start date relative to the Medicare payment reform: prereform (July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009; n=10,585), interim (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010; n=7832), and reform period (January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012; n=18,742). Patient characteristics and facility PD experience were compared at baseline (day 91 of ESKD). Patients were followed for 3 years for the major outcomes of PD discontinuation and mortality using Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics, including age, sex, race, ethnicity, rurality, cause of ESKD, and comorbidity, were similar or showed small changes across the three study periods. There was an increasing tendency for patients on PD to be treated in facilities with less PD experience (from 34% during the prereform period being treated in facilities averaging <14 patients on PD per year to 44% in the reform period). Patients treated in facilities with less PD experience had a higher rate of PD discontinuation than patients treated in facilities with the most experience (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.10 to 1.23 for the first versus fifth quintile of PD experience). Nevertheless, the risk of PD discontinuation fell during the late interim period (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.95) and most of the reform period (from HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.91 to HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.01). Mortality risk was stable across the three study periods.
CONCLUSIONS: In the context of expanding PD use and declining facility PD experience, the risk of PD discontinuation fell, and there was no adverse effect on mortality. PODCAST: This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2019_09_12_CJN01610219.mp3.
Copyright © 2019 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continental population groups; Medicare; United States; cohort studies; comorbidity; humans; kidney dialysis; motivation; outcomes; peritoneal dialysis; proportional hazards models; prospective payment system; renal dialysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31515234      PMCID: PMC6777599          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01610219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  27 in total

1.  Compared with younger peritoneal dialysis patients, elderly patients have similar peritonitis-free survival and lower risk of technique failure, but higher risk of peritonitis-related mortality.

Authors:  Wai H Lim; Gursharan K Dogra; Stephen P McDonald; Fiona G Brown; David W Johnson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Health Insurance and the Use of Peritoneal Dialysis in the United States.

Authors:  Jose J Perez; Bo Zhao; Samaya Qureshi; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Kevin F Erickson
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Neighborhood location, rurality, geography, and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Kenneth Story; Steven Guest; Michelle Fedunyszyn
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  D E Schaubel; P G Blake; S S Fenton
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  M J Oliver; R R Quinn; E P Richardson; A J Kiss; D L Lamping; B J Manns
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Medicare program; end-stage renal disease prospective payment system. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2010-08-12

7.  Determinants of peritoneal dialysis technique failure in incident US patients.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Aya A Mitani; Anjali B Saxena; Benjamin A Goldstein; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Perceived knowledge among patients cared for by nephrologists about chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease therapies.

Authors:  Fredric O Finkelstein; Kenneth Story; Catherine Firanek; Paul Barre; Tomoko Takano; Steven Soroka; Salim Mujais; Kathleen Rodd; David Mendelssohn
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Financial implications of choice of dialysis type of the revised Medicare payment system: an economic analysis.

Authors:  John Hornberger; Richard A Hirth
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Impact of the End Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System on the Use of Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Mae Thamer; Onkar Kshirsagar; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2016-12-20
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Approach To Promoting Home Hemodialysis during End Stage Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Robert Lockridge; Eric Weinhandl; Michael Kraus; Martin Schreiber; Leslie Spry; Prayus Tailor; Michelle Carver; Joel Glickman; Brent Miller
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-07-08

2.  Global Dialysis Perspective: Korea.

Authors:  Yong-Soo Kim; Dong-Chan Jin
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-01-03

3.  Comparing Mortality of Peritoneal and Hemodialysis Patients in an Era of Medicare Payment Reform.

Authors:  Virginia Wang; Cynthia J Coffman; Linda L Sanders; Abby Hoffman; Caroline E Sloan; Shoou-Yih D Lee; Richard A Hirth; Matthew L Maciejewski
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.178

4.  Trends in assisted peritoneal dialysis over the last decade: a cohort study from the French Peritoneal Dialysis Registry.

Authors:  Annabel Boyer; Antoine Lanot; Mark Lambie; Sonia Guillouet; Thierry Lobbedez; Clémence Béchade
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2020-05-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.