Noa Krawczyk1, Matthew Eisenberg2, Kristin E Schneider3, Tom M Richards4, B Casey Lyons5, Kate Jackson5, Lindsey Ferris6, Jonathan P Weiner7, Brendan Saloner8. 1. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: noakra@gmail.com. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 3. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 4. Johns Hopkins Center for Population and Health and Information Technology, Baltimore, MD. 5. Behavioral Health Administration, Maryland Department of Health, Columbia, MD. 6. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Chesapeake Regional Information System for Our Patients, Columbia, MD. 7. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Center for Population and Health and Information Technology, Baltimore, MD. 8. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Persons with substance use disorders frequently utilize emergency department (ED) services, creating an opportunity for intervention and referral to addiction treatment and harm-reduction services. However, EDs may not have the appropriate tools to distinguish which patients are at greatest risk for negative outcomes. We link hospital ED and medical examiner mortality databases in one state to identify individual-level risk factors associated with overdose death among ED patients with substance-related encounters. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study linked Maryland statewide ED hospital claims records for adults with nonfatal overdose or substance use disorder encounters in 2014 to 2015 with medical examiner mortality records in 2015 to 2016. Logistic regression was used to identify factors in hospital records associated with risk of opioid overdose death. Predicted probabilities for overdose death were calculated for hypothetical patients with different combinations of overdose and substance use diagnostic histories. RESULTS: A total of 139,252 patients had substance-related ED encounters in 2014 to 2015. Of these patients, 963 later experienced an opioid overdose death, indicating a case fatality rate of 69.2 per 10,000 patients, 6 times higher than that of patients who used the ED for any cause. Factors most strongly associated with death included having both an opioid and another substance use disorder (adjusted odds ratio 2.88; 95% confidence interval 2.04 to 4.07), having greater than or equal to 3 previous nonfatal overdoses (adjusted odds ratio 2.89; 95% confidence interval 1.54 to 5.43), and having a previous nonfatal overdose involving heroin (adjusted odds ratio 2.24; 95% confidence interval 1.64 to 3.05). CONCLUSION: These results highlight important differences in overdose risk among patients receiving care in EDs for substance-related conditions. The findings demonstrate the potential utility of incorporating routine data from patient records to assess risk of future negative outcomes and identify primary targets for initiation and linkage to lifesaving care.
STUDY OBJECTIVE:Persons with substance use disorders frequently utilize emergency department (ED) services, creating an opportunity for intervention and referral to addiction treatment and harm-reduction services. However, EDs may not have the appropriate tools to distinguish which patients are at greatest risk for negative outcomes. We link hospital ED and medical examiner mortality databases in one state to identify individual-level risk factors associated with overdose death among ED patients with substance-related encounters. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study linked Maryland statewide ED hospital claims records for adults with nonfatal overdose or substance use disorder encounters in 2014 to 2015 with medical examiner mortality records in 2015 to 2016. Logistic regression was used to identify factors in hospital records associated with risk of opioid overdose death. Predicted probabilities for overdose death were calculated for hypothetical patients with different combinations of overdose and substance use diagnostic histories. RESULTS: A total of 139,252 patients had substance-related ED encounters in 2014 to 2015. Of these patients, 963 later experienced an opioid overdose death, indicating a case fatality rate of 69.2 per 10,000 patients, 6 times higher than that of patients who used the ED for any cause. Factors most strongly associated with death included having both an opioid and another substance use disorder (adjusted odds ratio 2.88; 95% confidence interval 2.04 to 4.07), having greater than or equal to 3 previous nonfatal overdoses (adjusted odds ratio 2.89; 95% confidence interval 1.54 to 5.43), and having a previous nonfatal overdose involving heroin (adjusted odds ratio 2.24; 95% confidence interval 1.64 to 3.05). CONCLUSION: These results highlight important differences in overdose risk among patients receiving care in EDs for substance-related conditions. The findings demonstrate the potential utility of incorporating routine data from patient records to assess risk of future negative outcomes and identify primary targets for initiation and linkage to lifesaving care.
Authors: Gail D'Onofrio; Patrick G O'Connor; Michael V Pantalon; Marek C Chawarski; Susan H Busch; Patricia H Owens; Steven L Bernstein; David A Fiellin Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kristin Dwyer; Alexander Y Walley; Breanne K Langlois; Patricia M Mitchell; Kerrie P Nelson; John Cromwell; Edward Bernstein Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2015-04-01
Authors: John Strang; Nora D Volkow; Louisa Degenhardt; Matthew Hickman; Kimberly Johnson; George F Koob; Brandon D L Marshall; Mark Tyndall; Sharon L Walsh Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Jingchuan Guo; Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic; Qingnan Yang; James L Huang; Jeremy C Weiss; Gerald Cochran; Daniel C Malone; Courtney C Kuza; Adam J Gordon; Julie M Donohue; Walid F Gellad Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Thibaut Davy-Mendez; Eric Vittinghoff; Samantha E Dilworth; Leslie W Suen; Carl Braun; Phillip O Coffin; Derek D Satre; Elise D Riley Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Catherine Tomko; Kristin E Schneider; Saba Rouhani; Glenna J Urquhart; Ju Nyeong Park; Miles Morris; Susan G Sherman Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 4.591
Authors: Joe Feinglass; Jessica Ann Wang; Jiancheng Ye; Robert Tessier; Howard Kim Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Christian A Tomaszewski; Faith Quenzer; Bryan Corbett; Andrew Lafree; Daniel Lasoff; Jorge Romo; Leslie Mukau Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2021-06-18