Literature DB >> 31514579

Judging Truth.

Nadia M Brashier1, Elizabeth J Marsh2.   

Abstract

Deceptive claims surround us, embedded in fake news, advertisements, political propaganda, and rumors. How do people know what to believe? Truth judgments reflect inferences drawn from three types of information: base rates, feelings, and consistency with information retrieved from memory. First, people exhibit a bias to accept incoming information, because most claims in our environments are true. Second, people interpret feelings, like ease of processing, as evidence of truth. And third, people can (but do not always) consider whether assertions match facts and source information stored in memory. This three-part framework predicts specific illusions (e.g., truthiness, illusory truth), offers ways to correct stubborn misconceptions, and suggests the importance of converging cues in a post-truth world, where falsehoods travel further and faster than the truth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fluency; illusory truth; inference; knowledge; source; truth bias

Year:  2019        PMID: 31514579     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  8 in total

1.  Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lyons; Jacob M Montgomery; Andrew M Guess; Brendan Nyhan; Jason Reifler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  How Difficult Was It? Metacognitive Judgments About Problems and Their Solutions After the Aha Moment.

Authors:  Nadezhda V Moroshkina; Alina I Savina; Artur V Ammalainen; Valeria A Gershkovich; Ilia V Zverev; Olga V Lvova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  Prior exposure increases judged truth even during periods of mind wandering.

Authors:  Matthew L Stanley; Peter S Whitehead; Elizabeth J Marsh; Paul Seli
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  The effects of repetition frequency on the illusory truth effect.

Authors:  Aumyo Hassan; Sarah J Barber
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-05-13

5.  Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds.

Authors:  Matthew Groh; Ziv Epstein; Chaz Firestone; Rosalind Picard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Monetary incentives do not reduce the repetition-induced truth effect.

Authors:  Felix Speckmann; Christian Unkelbach
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

7.  The entertainment value of conspiracy theories.

Authors:  Jan-Willem van Prooijen; Joline Ligthart; Sabine Rosema; Yang Xu
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2021-07-14

8.  Perceived truth of statements and simulated social media postings: an experimental investigation of source credibility, repeated exposure, and presentation format.

Authors:  Lena Nadarevic; Rolf Reber; Anne Josephine Helmecke; Dilara Köse
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-11-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.