Literature DB >> 31513484

Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of the Value of Microsatellite Instability As a Biomarker in Gastric Cancer.

Filippo Pietrantonio1,2, Rosalba Miceli1, Alessandra Raimondi1, Young Woo Kim3, Won Ki Kang4, Ruth E Langley5, Yoon Young Choi6, Kyoung-Mee Kim4, Matthew Guy Nankivell5, Federica Morano1, Andrew Wotherspoon7, Nicola Valeri7,8, Myeong-Cherl Kook3, Ji Yeong An4, Heike I Grabsch9,10, Giovanni Fucà1, Sung Hoon Noh6, Tae Sung Sohn4, Sung Kim4, Maria Di Bartolomeo1, David Cunningham7, Jeeyun Lee4, Jae-Ho Cheong6, Elizabeth Catherine Smyth10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the CLASSIC and MAGIC trials, microsatellite instability (MSI)-high status was a favorable prognostic and potential negative predictive factor for neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable gastric cancer (GC). Given the low prevalence of MSI-high status in GC and its association with other positive prognostic variables, large data sets are needed to draw robust evidence of its prognostic/predictive value. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a multinational, individual-patient-data meta-analysis of the prognostic/predictive role of MSI in patients with resectable GC enrolled in the MAGIC, CLASSIC, ARTIST, and ITACA-S trials. Prognostic analyses used multivariable Cox models (MVM). The predictive role of MSI was assessed both in an all-comer population and in MAGIC and CLASSIC trials by MVM testing of the interaction of treatment (chemotherapy plus surgery v surgery) with MSI.
RESULTS: MSI status was available for 1,556 patients: 121 (7.8%) had MSI-high status; 576 were European, and 980 were Asian. In MSI-high versus MSI-low/microsatellite stable (MSS) comparisons, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 71.8% (95% CI, 63.8% to 80.7%) versus 52.3% (95% CI, 49.7% to 55.1%); the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 77.5% (95% CI, 70.0% to 85.8%) versus 59.3% (95% CI, 56.6% to 62.1%). In MVM, MSI was associated with longer DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.28 to 2.76; P < .001) and OS (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.73; P = .008), as were pT, pN, ethnicity, and treatment. Patients with MSI-low/MSS GC benefitted from chemotherapy plus surgery: the 5-year DFS compared with surgery only was 57% versus 41% (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.79), and the 5-year OS was 62% versus 53% (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.94). Conversely, those with MSI-high GC did not: the 5-year DFS was 70% versus 77% (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.53 to 3.04), and the 5-year OS was 75% versus 83% (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.55 to 4.12).
CONCLUSION: In patients with resectable primary GC, MSI is a robust prognostic marker that should be adopted as a stratification factor by clinical trials. Chemotherapy omission and/or immune checkpoint blockade should be investigated prospectively in MSI-high GCs according to clinically and pathologically defined risk of relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31513484     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.01124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  78 in total

1.  Prognostic and Predictive Value of Microsatellite Instability, Inflammatory Reaction and PD-L1 in Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Either Adjuvant 5-FU/LV or Sequential FOLFIRI Followed by Cisplatin and Docetaxel: A Translational Analysis from the ITACA-S Trial.

Authors:  Maria Di Bartolomeo; Federica Morano; Alessandra Raimondi; Rosalba Miceli; Salvatore Corallo; Elena Tamborini; Federica Perrone; Maria Antista; Monica Niger; Alessandro Pellegrinelli; Giovanni Randon; Filippo Pagani; Antonia Martinetti; Giovanni Fucà; Filippo Pietrantonio
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Salvage Treatment Using Anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 Immunotherapy After Failure of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Microsatellite Instable Gastroesophageal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Oliver Klein; Wendy A Brown; Sarah Saxon; Andrew Haydon
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-05-03

3.  Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Florian Lordick; Michael Ghadimi; Ines Gockel; Ulrich Graeven; C Benedikt Westphalen
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-10-02

Review 4.  Next generation sequencing in gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Geoffrey Y Ku
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-10-05

5.  Clinical Behavior and Treatment Response of Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Implications for the Development of Future Trials.

Authors:  Salvatore Corallo; Giovanni Fucà; Federica Morano; Massimiliano Salati; Andrea Spallanzani; Annunziata Gloghini; Chiara Costanza Volpi; Desirè Viola Trupia; Riccardo Lobefaro; Vincenzo Guarini; Massimo Milione; Laura Cattaneo; Maria Antista; Michele Prisciandaro; Alessandra Raimondi; Carlo Sposito; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Filippo de Braud; Filippo Pietrantonio; Maria Di Bartolomeo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-04-30

6.  FLOaTing toward new standards in locally advanced resectable gastroesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Lorenzo Fornaro; Caterina Vivaldi; Lorenzo Calvetti; Alessandro Cappetta; Alfredo Falcone; Giuseppe Aprile
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Consequences of the Hsp110DE9 mutation in tumorigenesis and the 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy response in Msh2-deficient mice.

Authors:  Kathleen Noel; A 'dem Bokhari; Romane Bertrand; Florence Renaud; Pierre Bourgoin; Romain Cohen; Magali Svrcek; Anne-Christine Joly; Alex Duval; Ada Collura
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 8.  Biomarkers for Precision Treatment in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Angelica Petrillo; Elizabeth C Smyth
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-09-25

9.  Concurrent lymphovascular and perineural invasion after preoperative therapy for gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with decreased survival.

Authors:  Alisa N Blumenthaler; Timothy E Newhook; Naruhiko Ikoma; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Mariela Blum Murphy; Prajnan Das; Bruce D Minsky; Jaffer A Ajani; Paul F Mansfield; Brian D Badgwell
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Tumor mutation burden as a biomarker in resected gastric cancer via its association with immune infiltration and hypoxia.

Authors:  Deqiang Wang; Ning Wang; Xiaoqin Li; Xiaofeng Chen; Bo Shen; Dongqin Zhu; Liuqing Zhu; Yaping Xu; Yangyang Yu; Yongqian Shu
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.