Literature DB >> 31512931

Risk of brainstem necrosis in pediatric patients with central nervous system malignancies after pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

J Vogel1, A Grewal2, S O'Reilly2, R Lustig2, G Kurtz2, J E Minturn3, A C Shah3, A J Waanders3, J B Belasco3, K A Cole3, M J Fisher3, P C Phillips3, N J Balamuth3, P B Storm3, C E Hill-Kayser2,3.   

Abstract

Background: Radiation therapy (RT) plays an important role in management of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) malignancies. Centers are increasingly utilizing pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT). However, the risk of brainstem necrosis has not yet been reported. In this study, we evaluate the rate of brainstem necrosis in pediatric patients with CNS malignancies treated with PBS-PT.Material and methods: Pediatric patients with non-hematologic CNS malignancies treated with PBS-PT who received dose to the brainstem were included. All procedures were approved by the institutional review board. Brainstem necrosis was defined as symptomatic toxicity. The actuarial rate was analyzed by the Kaplan Meier method.
Results: One hundred and sixty-six consecutive patients were reviewed. Median age was 10 years (range 0.5-21 years). Four patients (2.4%) had prior radiation. Median maximum brainstem dose in the treated course was 55.4 Gy[RBE] (range 0.15-61.4 Gy[RBE]). In patients with prior RT, cumulative median maximum brainstem dose was 98.0 Gy [RBE] (range 17.0-111.0 Gy [RBE]). Median follow up was 19.6 months (range, 2.0-63.0). One patient who had previously been treated with twice-daily radiation therapy and intrathecal (IT) methotrexate experienced brainstem necrosis. The actuarial incidence of brainstem necrosis was 0.7% at 24 months (95% CI 0.1-5.1%).
Conclusion: The rate of symptomatic brainstem necrosis was extremely low after treatment with PBS-PT in this study. Further work to clarify clinical and dosimetric parameters associated with risk of brainstem necrosis after PBS-PT is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31512931     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1659996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms and Review of Clinical Evidence of Variations in Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 8.013

2.  Quantifying the risk and dosimetric variables of symptomatic brainstem injury after proton beam radiation in pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Rituraj Upadhyay; Kaiping Liao; David R Grosshans; Susan L McGovern; Mary Frances McAleer; Wafik Zaky; Murali M Chintagumpala; Anita Mahajan; Debra Nana Yeboa; Arnold C Paulino
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 13.029

3.  Redefine the Role of Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy for the Single Brain Metastasis Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Authors:  Sheng Chang; Gang Liu; Lewei Zhao; Weili Zheng; Di Yan; Peter Chen; Xiangpan Li; Kunyu Yang; Rohan Deraniyagala; Craig Stevens; Inga Grills; Prakash Chinnaiyan; Xiaoqiang Li; Xuanfeng Ding
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Proton therapy needs further technological development to fulfill the promise of becoming a superior treatment modality (compared to photon therapy).

Authors:  Daniel E Hyer; Xuanfeng Ding; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Dosimetric analysis of radiation-induced brainstem necrosis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with IMRT.

Authors:  Xigang Fan; Yecai Huang; Peng Xu; Yanmei Min; Jie Li; Mei Feng; Guohui Xu; Jinyi Lang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.