Literature DB >> 31512720

Sex Differences in Functional Brain Networks for Language.

Min Xu1,2, Xiuling Liang1,2,3, Jian Ou1,2,3, Hong Li1,2,4, Yue-Jia Luo1,2, Li Hai Tan1,2.   

Abstract

Men and women process language differently, but how the brain functions to support this difference is poorly understood. A few studies reported sex influences on brain activation for language, whereas others failed to detect the difference at the functional level. Recent advances of brain network analysis have shown great promise in picking up brain connectivity differences between sexes, leading us to hypothesize that the functional connections among distinct brain regions for language may differ in males and females. To test this hypothesis, we scanned 58 participants' brain activities (28 males and 30 females) in a semantic decision task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. We found marked sex differences in dynamic interactions among language regions, as well as in functional segregation and integration of brain networks during language processing. The brain network differences were further supported by a machine learning analysis that accurately discriminated males from females using the multivariate patterns of functional connectivity. The sex-specific functional brain connectivity may constitute an essential neural basis for the long-held notion that men and women process language in different ways. Our finding also provides important implications for sex differences in the prevalence of language disorders, such as dyslexia and stuttering.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain networks; language; machine learning; sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31512720     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  5 in total

1.  Men and women differ in the neural basis of handwriting.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Fred Tam; Simon J Graham; Guochen Sun; Junjun Li; Chanyuan Gu; Ran Tao; Nizhuan Wang; Hong-Yan Bi; Zhentao Zuo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Morphological and hemispheric and sex differences of the anterior ascending ramus and the horizontal ascending ramus of the lateral sulcus.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Feifei Xu; Wenjuan Zhou; Lanwei Hou; Yuchun Tang; Shuwei Liu
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Brain Functional Connectivity in Low- and High-Grade Gliomas: Differences in Network Dynamics Associated with Tumor Grade and Location.

Authors:  Luca Pasquini; Mehrnaz Jenabi; Onur Yildirim; Patrick Silveira; Kyung K Peck; Andrei I Holodny
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Sex differences in the functional topography of association networks in youth.

Authors:  Sheila Shanmugan; Jakob Seidlitz; Zaixu Cui; Azeez Adebimpe; Danielle S Bassett; Maxwell A Bertolero; Christos Davatzikos; Damien A Fair; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Bart Larsen; Hongming Li; Adam Pines; Armin Raznahan; David R Roalf; Russell T Shinohara; Jacob Vogel; Daniel H Wolf; Yong Fan; Aaron Alexander-Bloch; Theodore D Satterthwaite
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Differential effects of sex on longitudinal patterns of cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Megan C Bakeberg; Anastazja M Gorecki; Jade E Kenna; Alexa Jefferson; Michelle Byrnes; Soumya Ghosh; Malcolm K Horne; Sarah McGregor; Rick Stell; Sue Walters; Paola Chivers; Samantha J Winter; Frank L Mastaglia; Ryan S Anderton
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.849

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.