Yuan Mu1, Yingxuan Ma1, Wei Yang2, Yulei Diao1, Zhao Qiao1, Wenke Liu1, Yanfeng Luo2, Liangjun Yin3. 1. Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, P.R.China. 2. Bioengineering College of Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, P.R.China. 3. Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, P.R.China.albertyin.21@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical properties of two ultra-strong sutures and suturing methods in panda rope bridge technique (PRBT) application, and provide guidance for clinical selection of suture threads and suture methods. METHODS: Forty Achilles tendons from bulls were randomly divided into 4 groups ( n=10) and transected at the 4 cm proximal to the tendon insertion. Groups A and B used Ethibond sutures (USP 5), the proximal end was fixed at the myotendious junction with Krackow sutures and the distal end was fixed through a calcaneus canal. Groups A and B had 4 and 8 threads through the stump plane, respectively. Groups C and D used Ultrabraid sutures (USP 2), the proximal end was fixed at the myotendious junction with Krackow sutures and the distal end was fixed in the calcaneus with two anchors. Groups C and D had 4 and 8 threads through the stump plane, respectively. The dynamic tensile forces of 20-100, 20-200, 20-300, and 20-400 N were tested respectively by using a dynamic tensile testing machine at 0.5 Hz for 250 cycles. After each stage of testing, the gap between stumps was measured with a caliper and the type of suture failure was recorded. RESULTS: After dynamic tensile forces of 20-100 N and 20-200 N, the gaps of the four groups arranged from small to large were groups D, B, C, and A. The differences between groups A and B and groups C and D were significant ( P<0.05). But after dynamic tensile forces of 20-300 N and 20-400 N, the gaps were more than 5 mm in all groups. The suture retention rates of the four groups after dynamic tensile forces of 20-100 N and 20-200 N were all 100%. The suture retention rates of groups A, B, C, and D were 0, 80%, 60%, and 100%, respectively after dynamic tensile forces of 20-300 N. The differences of suture retention rates between group A and groups B and D were significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups B, C, and D ( P>0.05). After dynamic tensile forces of 20-400 N, the suture retention rates of groups A, B, C, and D were 0, 50%, 0, and 70%, respectively. There were significant differences between groups A and B and groups C and D ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Repairing Achilles tendon rupture via PRBT with 8 ultra-strong sutures through the stump plane can meet the mechanical requirements for walking by using ankle boots and heel pads in the early accelerated rehabilitation after operation.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical properties of two ultra-strong sutures and suturing methods in panda rope bridge technique (PRBT) application, and provide guidance for clinical selection of suture threads and suture methods. METHODS: Forty Achilles tendons from bulls were randomly divided into 4 groups ( n=10) and transected at the 4 cm proximal to the tendon insertion. Groups A and B used Ethibond sutures (USP 5), the proximal end was fixed at the myotendious junction with Krackow sutures and the distal end was fixed through a calcaneus canal. Groups A and B had 4 and 8 threads through the stump plane, respectively. Groups C and D used Ultrabraid sutures (USP 2), the proximal end was fixed at the myotendious junction with Krackow sutures and the distal end was fixed in the calcaneus with two anchors. Groups C and D had 4 and 8 threads through the stump plane, respectively. The dynamic tensile forces of 20-100, 20-200, 20-300, and 20-400 N were tested respectively by using a dynamic tensile testing machine at 0.5 Hz for 250 cycles. After each stage of testing, the gap between stumps was measured with a caliper and the type of suture failure was recorded. RESULTS: After dynamic tensile forces of 20-100 N and 20-200 N, the gaps of the four groups arranged from small to large were groups D, B, C, and A. The differences between groups A and B and groups C and D were significant ( P<0.05). But after dynamic tensile forces of 20-300 N and 20-400 N, the gaps were more than 5 mm in all groups. The suture retention rates of the four groups after dynamic tensile forces of 20-100 N and 20-200 N were all 100%. The suture retention rates of groups A, B, C, and D were 0, 80%, 60%, and 100%, respectively after dynamic tensile forces of 20-300 N. The differences of suture retention rates between group A and groups B and D were significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups B, C, and D ( P>0.05). After dynamic tensile forces of 20-400 N, the suture retention rates of groups A, B, C, and D were 0, 50%, 0, and 70%, respectively. There were significant differences between groups A and B and groups C and D ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Repairing Achilles tendon rupture via PRBT with 8 ultra-strong sutures through the stump plane can meet the mechanical requirements for walking by using ankle boots and heel pads in the early accelerated rehabilitation after operation.
Authors: Steven J Lee; Scott Goldsmith; Stephen J Nicholas; Malachy McHugh; Ian Kremenic; Simon Ben-Avi Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: Carlos A Uquillas; Michael S Guss; Devon J Ryan; Laith M Jazrawi; Eric J Strauss Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Iikka Lantto; Juuso Heikkinen; Tapio Flinkkila; Pasi Ohtonen; Jarmo Kangas; Pertti Siira; Juhana Leppilahti Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Michael J Mullaney; Malachy P McHugh; Timothy F Tyler; Stephen J Nicholas; Steven J Lee Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2006-02-13 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Roderick Metz; Egbert-Jan M M Verleisdonk; Geert J-M-G van der Heijden; Geert-Jan Clevers; Erik R Hammacher; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Christiaan van der Werken Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2008-07-21 Impact factor: 6.202